The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation of Quercetin and Luteolin by Eubacterium ramulus
Open accessAbstract
The degradation of the flavonol quercetin and the flavone luteolin by Eubacterium ramulus, a strict anaerobe of the human intestinal tract, was studied. Resting cells converted these flavonoids to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid, respectively. The conversion of quercetin was accompanied by the transient formation of two intermediates, one of which was identified as taxifolin based on its specific retention time and UV and mass spectra. The structure of the second intermediate, alphitonin, was additionally elucidated by 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. In resting-cell experiments, taxifolin in turn was converted via alphitonin to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. Alphitonin, which was prepared by enzymatic conversion of taxifolin and subsequent purification, was also transformed to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. The coenzyme-independent isomerization of taxifolin to alphitonin was catalyzed by cell extract or a partially purified enzyme preparation of E. ramulus. The degradation of luteolin by resting cells of E. ramulus resulted in the formation of the intermediate eriodictyol, which was identified by high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis. The observed intermediates of quercetin and luteolin conversion suggest that the degradation pathways in E. ramulus start with an analogous reduction step followed by different enzymatic reactions depending on the additional 3-hydroxyl group present in the flavonol structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in flavonoid research since 1992
Harborne, J. B., & Williams, C. A. (2000) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00235-1 · Cited by 3,956
Hertog, M. G. L., Hollman, P. C. H., Katan, M. B., & Kromhout, D. (1993) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589309514267 · Cited by 1,216
Cited by
Harwood, M., Danielewska-Nikiel, B., Borzelleca, J. F., Flamm, G. W., Williams, G. M., & Lines, T. C. (2007) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.05.015 · Cited by 889
Effect of tea phenolics and their aromatic fecal bacterial metabolites on intestinal microbiota
Lee, H. C., Jenner, A. M., Low, C. S., & Lee, Y. K. (2006) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2006.07.004 · Cited by 697
Polyphenol-Mediated Gut Microbiota Modulation: Toward Prebiotics and Further
Rodríguez-Daza, M. C., Pulido-Mateos, E. C., Lupien-Meilleur, J., Guyonnet, D., Desjardins, Y., & Roy, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.689456 · Cited by 474
Cortés‐Martín, A., Selma, M. V., Tomás‐Barberán, F. A., González‐Sarrías, A., & Espín, J. C. (2020) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201900952 · Cited by 298
Appeldoorn, M. M., Vincken, J.-P., Aura, A.-M., Hollman, P. C. H., & Gruppen, H. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf803059z · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Braune, A., Gütschow, M., Engst, W., & Blaut, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5558-5567
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2144177252
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation of Quercetin and Luteolin by Eubacterium ramulus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.12.5558-5567.2001
- The paper
- Braune, A., Gütschow, M., Engst, W., & Blaut, M. (2001). Degradation of Quercetin and Luteolin by Eubacterium ramulus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.12.5558-5567.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.