The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clostridium difficile Toxins: Mechanism of Action and Role in Disease
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: As the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea,Clostridium difficile colonizes the large bowel of patients undergoing antibiotic therapy and produces two toxins, which cause notable disease pathologies. These two toxins, TcdA and TcdB, are encoded on a pathogenicity locus along with negative and positive regulators of their expression. Following expression and release from the bacterium, TcdA and TcdB translocate to the cytosol of target cells and inactivate small GTP-binding proteins, which include Rho, Rac, and Cdc42. Inactivation of these substrates occurs through monoglucosylation of a single reactive threonine, which lies within the effector-binding loop and coordinates a divalent cation critical to binding GTP. By glucosylating small GTPases, TcdA and TcdB cause actin condensation and cell rounding, which is followed by death of the cell. TcdA elicits effects primarily within the intestinal epithelium, while TcdB has a broader cell tropism. Important advances in the study of these toxins have been made in the past 15 years, and these are detailed in this review. The domains, subdomains, and residues of these toxins important for receptor binding and enzymatic activity have been elegantly studied and are highlighted herein. Furthermore, there have been major advances in defining the role of these toxins in modulating the inflammatory events involving the disruption of cell junctions, neuronal activation, cytokine production, and infiltration by polymorphonuclear cells. Collectively, the present review provides a comprehensive update on TcdA and TcdB's mechanism of action as well as the role of these toxins in disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spectrum of pseudomembranous enterocolitis and antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Hurley, B. W., & Nguyen, C. C. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.19.2177 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy
Krysko, D. V., Garg, A. D., Kaczmarek, A., Krysko, O., Agostinis, P., & Vandenabeele, P. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3380 · Cited by 3,223
The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection
Kuehne, S. A., Cartman, S. T., Heap, J. T., Kelly, M. L., Cockayne, A., & Minton, N. P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09397 · Cited by 855
Bile Salts and Glycine as Cogerminants for Clostridium difficile Spores
Sorg, J. A., & Sonenshein, A. L. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01765-07 · Cited by 711
Understanding the mechanisms of faecal microbiota transplantation
Khoruts, A., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.98 · Cited by 561
Role of the Intestinal Microbiota in Resistance to Colonization by Clostridium difficile
Britton, R. A., & Young, V. B. (2014) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.059 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Voth, D. E., & Ballard, J. D.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-263
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2102459023
- Cited by
- 1,104
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clostridium difficile Toxins: Mechanism of Action and Role in Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.18.2.247-263.2005
- The paper
- Voth, D. E., & Ballard, J. D. (2005). Clostridium difficile Toxins: Mechanism of Action and Role in Disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.18.2.247-263.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.