Cited by 446Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Role of the Intestinal Microbiota in Resistance to Colonization by Clostridium difficile

Open access
Britton, Robert A., Young, Vincent B.·2014·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Antibiotic-associated infection with the bacterial pathogen Clostridium difficile is a major cause of morbidity and increased health care costs. C difficile infection follows disruption of the indigenous gut microbiota by antibiotics. Antibiotics create an environment within the intestine that promotes C difficile spore germination, vegetative growth, and toxin production, leading to epithelial damage and colitis. Studies of patients with C difficile infection and animal models have shown that the indigenous microbiota can inhibit expansion and persistence of C difficile. Although the specific mechanisms of these processes are not known, they are likely to interfere with key aspects of the pathogen's physiology, including spore germination and competitive growth. Increasing our understanding of how the intestinal microbiota manage C difficile could lead to better means of controlling this important nosocomial pathogen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.059

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Britton, R. A., & Young, V. B.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Vincent B.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
146
Issue
6
Pages
1547-1553
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025786976
Cited by
446
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 19
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U19090872)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI090871, U19AI090872)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK034933)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Clostridium difficile, gut microbiota, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile infection, spore germination, toxin production, competitive exclusion, colitis, nosocomial infections, gut dysbiosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bile Acids and Salts, Biological Therapy, Disease Models, Animal, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Feces, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Clostridioides difficile, Probiotics, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Microbiota, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review