The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antigenic heterogeneity of Bacteroides intermedius as recognized by monoclonal antibodies
Open accessAbstract
Four hybrid cell lines secreting monoclonal antibodies against antigens of Bacteroides intermedius were generated by fusing murine NSI cells with splenocytes from a rat immunized with B. intermedius strain OMZ248. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to analyze the distribution of the recognized antigens on 39 strains from various Bacteroides species and on 5 strains from other genera. Only Bacteroides species B. intermedius, B. loescheii, B. melaninogenicus, and B. corporis were found to express at least one of the recognized antigens. Strains of the two asaccharolytic black-pigmenting Bacteroides species were negative. Among the strains capable of binding to one or more of the monoclonal antibodies, five groups with different reactivity patterns could be distinguished. Two of the monoclonal antibodies were specific for B. intermedius. The B. intermedius strains were metabolically almost identical, expressed at least three of the recognized antigens, and fell into three distinct antibody reactivity groups, suggesting a tentative separation of this species into three new serogroups. Oral and nonoral isolates of B. intermedius were, however, not distinguished by the monoclonal antibodies. One monoclonal antibody was directed against an antigen strongly expressed on all saccharolytic black-pigmenting Bacteroides strains tested so far, thus confirming the previously noted antigenic relationship between the species which had emerged from the former B. melaninogenicus subsp. intermedius and B. melaninogenicus subsp. melaninogenicus groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Validation of an in vitro Biofilm Model of Supragingival Plaque
Guggenheim, B., Giertsen, E., Schüpbach, P., & Shapiro, S. (2001) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345010800011201 · Cited by 357
Self-citationMass Transport of Macromolecules within an In Vitro Model of Supragingival Plaque
Thurnheer, T., Gmür, R., Shapiro, S., & Guggenheim, B. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.3.1702-1709.2003 · Cited by 145
Self-citationSchüpbach, P., Neeser, J. R., Golliard, M., Rouvet, M., & Guggenheim, B. (1996) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345960750101101 · Cited by 126
Self-citationCosta, R. C., Souza, J. G. S., Bertolini, M., Retamal‐Valdes, B., Feres, M., & Barão, V. A. R. (2020) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.13663 · Cited by 48
Microbial dynamics during conversion from supragingival to subgingival biofilms in an in vitro model
Thurnheer, T., Bostanci, N., & Belibasakis, G. N. (2016) · Molecular Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1111/omi.12108 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Gmür, R., & Guggenheim, B.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 459-470
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2098502218
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antigenic heterogeneity of Bacteroides intermedius as recognized by monoclonal antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.42.2.459-470.1983
- The paper
- Gmür, R., & Guggenheim, B. (1983). Antigenic heterogeneity of Bacteroides intermedius as recognized by monoclonal antibodies. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.42.2.459-470.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.