The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies have shown that indigenous bacteria isolated from cervical, vaginal, and urethral surfaces of healthy women are able to adhere to human uroepithelial cells in vitro. Furthermore, these organisms were found to block the adherence of uropathogenic bacteria to uroepithelial cells from women with and without a history of urinary tract infections. In the present study, complete or partial inhibition of the adherence of gram-negative uropathogens was achieved by preincubating the uroepithelial cells with bacterial cell wall fragments isolated from a Lactobacillus strain. Competitive exclusion was most effective with whole viable cells and less effective with cell wall fragments obtained by sonication, extraction with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and treatment with sodium dodecyl sulfate and acid. Analysis of the Lactobacillus cell wall preparations suggested that lipoteichoic acid was responsible for the adherence of the Lactobacillus cells to uroepithelial cells but that steric hindrance was the major factor in preventing the adherence of uropathogens. This conclusion was also supported by blockage studies with reconstituted lipoteichoic acid-peptidoglycan, which was more effective at blocking adherence than lipoteichoic acid or peptidoglycan alone. The results suggest that the normal flora of the urinary tract may be used to protect against the attachment of uropathogens to the surfaces of uroepithelial cells. The long-term implications of these findings may lead to alternative methods for the management and prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and Disease
Costerton, J. W., Cheng, K. J., Geesey, G. G., Ladd, T. I., Nickel, J. C., Dasgupta, M., & Marrie, T. J. (1987) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251 · Cited by 3,145
Self-citationProbiotic Spectra of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB)
Naidu, A. S., Bidlack, W. R., & Clemens, R. A. (1999) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408699991279187 · Cited by 698
Survival ofLactobacillus species (strain GG) in human gastrointestinal tract
Goldin, B. R., Gorbach, S. L., Saxelin, M., Barakat, S., Gualtieri, L., & Salminen, S. (1992) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01308354 · Cited by 554
Liévin, V, Peiffer, I., Hudault, S., Rochat, F., Brassart, D., Neeser, J.-R., & Servin, A. L. (2000) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.47.5.646 · Cited by 397
Gopal, P. K., Prasad, J., Smart, J., & Gill, H. S. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00440-8 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, R. C., Reid, G., Irvin, R. T., Bruce, A. W., & Costerton, J. W.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-89
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2098593307
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.47.1.84-89.1985
- The paper
- Chan, R. C., Reid, G., Irvin, R. T., Bruce, A. W., & Costerton, J. W. (1985). Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.47.1.84-89.1985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.