CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,145Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and Disease

Costerton, J W, Cheng, K J, Geesey, G G, Ladd, T I, Nickel, J C, Dasgupta, M, Marrie, T J·1987·Annual Review of Microbiology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The growth of bacteria in pure cultures has been the mainstay of microbiologicaltechnique from the time of Pasteur to the present. Solid media techniques have allowed the isolation of individual species from complex natural populations. These pure isolates are intensively studied as they grow in batch cultures in nutrient-rich media. This experimental approach has served well in providing an increasingly accurate understanding of prokaryotic genetics and metabolism and in facilitating the isolation and identification of pathogens in a wide variety of diseases. Further, vaccines and antibiotics developed on the basis of in vitro data and tested on test-tube bacteria have provided a large measure of control of these pathogenic organisms.During the last two decades microbial ecologists have developed a series of exciting new techniques for the examination of bacteria growing in vivo, and often in situ, in natural environments and in pathogenic relationships with tissues. The data suggest that these organisms differ profoundly from cells of the same species grown in vitro. Brown & Williams (12) have shown that bacteria growing in infected tissues produce cell surface components not found on cells grown in vitro and that a whole spectrum of cell wall structures may be produced in cells of the same species in response to variations in nutrient status, surface growth, and other environmental factors (67). We and others (28) have used direct ecological methods to examine bacterial cells growing in natural and pathogenic ecosystems, and we find that many important populations grow in adherent biofilms and structured consortia that are not seen in pure cultures growing in nutrient-rich media. In fact, it is difficult to imagine actual natural or pathogenic ecosystems in which the bacteria would be as well nourished and as well protected as they are in single-species batch cultures.In this review we summarize and synthesize the data generated by the new direct methods of studying mixed natural bacterial populations in situ. Generally, morphological data give us a basic concept of community structure, direct bioch emical techniques monitor metabolic processes at the whole community level, and specific probes define cell surface structures in situ. Any in vitr o techniques used in these ecological studies are sel ected to mimic the natural ecosystem as closely as possible. In our estimation, data from studies of bacter ia growing in single-species batch cultures continue to be very valuable. However, these data represent a single, and perhaps unrepresentative, point in the broad spectrum of bacterial characteristics expressed in response to altered environmental factors. In retrospect, it may become apparent that the phenotypic plasticity of bacteri a (12, 107) and their ability to form structured and cooperative consortia will prove to be their most remarkable characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A near-universal characteristic of biofilms, compared with their free-floating counterparts, is the greater resistance of their cells to chemical and physical insults.

    “A near-universal characteristic of biofilms, compared with their free-floating counterparts, is the greater resistance of their cells to chemical and physical insults (31, 32).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Costerton, J. W., Cheng, K. J., Geesey, G. G., Ladd, T. I., Nickel, J. C., Dasgupta, M., & Marrie, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
ORCID
Nickel, J C
Venue
Annual Review of Microbiology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
1987-10
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
435-464
ISSN
  • 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-3251
DOI
10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251
OpenAlex
W2155327463
Cited by
3,145
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 125 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 122 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 112
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
bacterial biofilms, bacterial consortium, phenotypic plasticity, cell surface structure, cell wall structure, bacterial adhesion, pathogenic bacteria
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Bacterial Adhesion, Bacterial Infections, Equipment Contamination, Humans, Water Microbiology, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review