The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of perorally administered lactobacilli on macrophage activation in mice
Open accessAbstract
The effect of perorally (p.o) administered Lactobacillus casei and L. bulgaricus on macrophage activation in mice was studied. L. casei and L. bulgaricus were administered p.o. to mice for 8 days. The macrophage activation was measured on days 2, 3, 5, and 8 of lactobacillus administration by using biochemical and functional criteria. We measured the release of lysosomal hydrolases, the level of a nonlysosomal enzyme, and in vitro phagocytic activity of mouse peritoneal macrophages. All the assays were performed comparatively with mice inoculated with L. casei and L. bulgaricus (viable and nonviable cells) intraperitoneally (i.p.) at the same dose as for p.o. administration. The phagocytic activity was significantly higher in mice treated i.p. than in control mice. For p.o. administration, there was an increase only when L. casei was used. L. bulgaricus had little effect. No differences were found between viable and nonviable cells. The phagocytic function of the reticuloendothelial system was tested by the carbon clearance test, which showed that L. casei and L. bulgaricus accelerate the phagocytic function in mice treated p.o and i.p., from day 2 onward. These observations show that L. casei and L. bulgaricus given by p.o. administration are able to activate macrophages in mice and suggest that these bacteria, when passing through the intestinal tract, may be responsible for the enhanced host immune response. This fact is very significant because the diet includes fermented and manufactured products containing lactobacilli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Probiotics: effects on immunity
Isolauri, E., Sütas, Y., Kankaanpää, P., Arvilommi, H., & Salminen, S. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.2.444s · Cited by 1,019
Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modern perspective on a traditional therapy
Alvarez-Olmos, M. I., & Oberhelman, R. A. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/320518 · Cited by 359
Apathogenic, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria stimulate the mucosal immune system of mice
Klaasen, H. L., Van der Heijden, P. J., Stok, W., Poelma, F. G., Koopman, J. P., Van den Brink, M. E., Bakker, M. H., Eling, W. M., & Beynen, A. C. (1993) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.61.1.303-306.1993 · Cited by 231
Immunomodulatory and antioxidant potential of Lactobacillus exopolysaccharides
Liu, C., Tseng, K., Chiang, S., Lee, B., Hsu, W., & Pan, T. (2011) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.4456 · Cited by 230
Immunomodulation by commensal and probiotic bacteria
Forsythe, P., & Bienenstock, J. (2010) · Immunological Investigations · doi:10.3109/08820131003667978 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Perdigon, G., de Macias, M. E., Alvarez, S., Oliver, G., & de Ruiz Holgado, A. A.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 404-410
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W1978146503
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of perorally administered lactobacilli on macrophage activation in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.53.2.404-410.1986
- The paper
- Perdigon, G., de Macias, M. E., Alvarez, S., Oliver, G., & de Ruiz Holgado, A. A. (1986). Effect of perorally administered lactobacilli on macrophage activation in mice. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.53.2.404-410.1986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.