The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Involvement of a Novel Efflux System in Biofilm-Specific Resistance to Antibiotics
Open accessAbstract
Bacteria growing in biofilms are more resistant to antibiotics than their planktonic counterparts. How this transition occurs is unclear, but it is likely there are multiple mechanisms of resistance that act together in order to provide an increased overall level of resistance to the biofilm. We have identified a novel efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that is important for biofilm-specific resistance to a subset of antibiotics. Complete deletion of the genes encoding this pump, PA1874 to PA1877 (PA1874-1877) genes, in an P. aeruginosa PA14 background results in an increase in sensitivity to tobramycin, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin, specifically when this mutant strain is growing in a biofilm. This efflux pump is more highly expressed in biofilm cells than in planktonic cells, providing an explanation for why these genes are important for biofilm but not planktonic resistance to antibiotics. Furthermore, expression of these genes in planktonic cells increases their resistance to antibiotics. We have previously shown that ndvB is important for biofilm-specific resistance (T. F. Mah, B. Pitts, B. Pellock, G. C. Walker, P. S. Stewart, and G. A. O'Toole, Nature 426:306-310, 2003). Our discovery that combining the ndvB mutation with the PA1874-1877 gene deletion results in a mutant strain that is more sensitive to antibiotics than either single mutant strain suggests that ndvB and PA1874-1877 contribute to two different mechanisms of biofilm-specific resistance to antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Displays Multiple Phenotypes during Development as a Biofilm
Sauer, K., Camper, A. K., Ehrlich, G. D., Costerton, J. W., & Davies, D. G. (2002) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.184.4.1140-1154.2002 · Cited by 1,691 · cited 1×
“None of these genes have been identified as biofilm-specific genes in genomic and proteomic studies (37, 38, 41), likely due to differences between P.”
BackgroundEfflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Cited by
Backer, R., Rokem, J. S., Ilangumaran, G., Lamont, J., Praslickova, D., Ricci, E., Subramanian, S., & Smith, D. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01473 · Cited by 2,114
Biofilm-Specific Antibiotic Resistance
Mah, T.-F. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.76 · Cited by 504
Self-citationTseng, B. S., Zhang, W., Harrison, J. J., Quach, T. P., Song, J. L., Penterman, J., Singh, P. K., Chopp, D. L., Packman, A. I., & Parsek, M. R. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12155 · Cited by 466
Antimicrobial Tolerance in Biofilms
Stewart, P. S. (2015) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mb-0010-2014 · Cited by 450
Borges, A., Abreu, A., Dias, C., Saavedra, M., Borges, F., & Simões, M. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21070877 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., & Mah, T.-F.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4447-4452
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2169846007
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Involvement of a Novel Efflux System in Biofilm-Specific Resistance to Antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.01655-07
- The paper
- Zhang, L., & Mah, T.-F. (2008). Involvement of a Novel Efflux System in Biofilm-Specific Resistance to Antibiotics. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01655-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.