The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory-Developed Assays for In Vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories
Open accessAbstract
Multiple laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) and commercially available assays have emerged to meet diagnostic needs related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. To date, there is limited comparison data for these different testing platforms. We compared the analytical performance of a LDT developed in our clinical laboratory based on CDC primer sets and four commercially available, FDA emergency use authorized assays for SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid, DiaSorin, Hologic Panther, and Roche Cobas) on a total of 169 nasopharyngeal swabs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time
Dong, E., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30120-1 · Cited by 10,048
First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States
Holshue, M. L., DeBolt, C., Lindquist, S., Lofy, K. H., Wiesman, J., Bruce, H., Spitters, C., Ericson, K., Wilkerson, S., Tural, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001191 · Cited by 6,030
Cited by
Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests
Vandenberg, O., Martiny, D., Rochas, O., van Belkum, A., & Kozlakidis, Z. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-00461-z · Cited by 803
Addetia, A., Crawford, K. H. D., Dingens, A., Zhu, H., Roychoudhury, P., Huang, M.-L., Jerome, K. R., Bloom, J. D., & Greninger, A. L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02107-20 · Cited by 525
Self-citationRapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J. J., Berhane, S., Taylor, M., Adriano, A., Davenport, C., Dittrich, S., Emperador, D., Takwoingi, Y., Cunningham, J., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013705.pub2 · Cited by 591
Paltiel, A. D., Zheng, A., & Walensky, R. P. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16818 · Cited by 445
Molecular diagnostic technologies for COVID-19: Limitations and challenges
Afzal, A. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.002 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Lieberman, J. A., Pepper, G., Naccache, S. N., Huang, M.-L., Jerome, K. R., & Greninger, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2020-07-23
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W3021366901
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory-Developed Assays for In Vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.00821-20
- The paper
- Lieberman, J. A., Pepper, G., Naccache, S. N., Huang, M.-L., Jerome, K. R., & Greninger, A. L. (2020). Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory-Developed Assays for In Vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00821-20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
