The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of murine typhus infection in fleas by using the polymerase chain reaction
Open accessAbstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of DNA was used to detect the etiologic agent of murine typhus, Rickettsia typhi, in experimentally infected adult fleas. A primer pair derived from the 17-kilodalton antigen sequence of typhus and spotted fever group rickettsiae was used to amplify a 434-base-pair (bp) fragment of the genome of the murine typhus rickettsiae. The amplified 17-kilodalton protein antigen-specific sequence was detected in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels in individual fleas as early as 2 days after exposure to rickettsemic rats (two of six tested). The 434-bp sequence was not detected in uninfected control fleas. A dot hybridization assay used to detect the 434-bp fragment was also specific and about 100-fold more sensitive than the agarose gel PCR assay. Since the PCR assay employed a boiled extract of triturated fleas, both PCR and an antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) could be performed on the same individual flea homogenate. The ELISA identified 12 infected fleas out of 29 randomly selected fleas, compared with 14 specimens which were positive by PCR. The PCR assay detected rickettsiae in samples in which no viable rickettsiae were detected by plaque assay. Like the ELISA, the PCR assay sensitivity was due in part to its suitability for detecting small numbers of both live and dead R. typhi in fleas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Azad, A. F. (1990) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.003005 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Cited by
Identification of a novel rickettsial infection in a patient diagnosed with murine typhus
Schriefer, M. E., Sacci, J. B., Dumler, J. S., Bullen, M. G., & Azad, A. F. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.32.4.949-954.1994 · Cited by 268
Self-citationAzad, A. F., Sacci, J. B., Nelson, W. M., Dasch, G. A., Schmidtmann, E. T., & Carl, M. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.1.43 · Cited by 153
Self-citationRickettsia felis: molecular characterization of a new member of the spotted fever group.
Bouyer, D. H., Stenos, J., Crocquet-Valdes, P., Moron, C. G., Popov, V. L., Zavala-Velazquez, J. E., Foil, L. D., Stothard, D. R., Azad, A. F., & Walker, D. H. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-2-339 · Cited by 136
Self-citationHiggins, J. A., Sacci, J. B., Schriefer, M. E., Endris, R. G., & Azad, A. F. (1994) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.1994.tb00147.x · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, L., Carl, M., Malloy, D. C., Dasch, G. A., & Azad, A. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 530-534
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1540621119
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of murine typhus infection in fleas by using the polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.28.3.530-534.1990
- The paper
- Webb, L., Carl, M., Malloy, D. C., Dasch, G. A., & Azad, A. F. (1990). Detection of murine typhus infection in fleas by using the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.28.3.530-534.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.