Cited by 153Vector-borne infectious diseasesInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesBartonella species infections research

Genetic characterization and transovarial transmission of a typhus-like rickettsia found in cat fleas.

Open access
Azad, A F, Sacci, J B, Nelson, W M, Dasch, G A, Schmidtmann, E T, Carl, M·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The identification of apparently fastidious microorganisms is often problematic. DNA from a rickettsia-like agent (called the ELB agent) present in cat fleas could be amplified by PCR with conserved primers derived from rickettsial 17-kDa common protein antigen and citrate synthase genes but not spotted fever group 190-kDa antigen gene. Alu I sites in both the 17-kDa and citrate synthase PCR products obtained with the rickettsia-like agent and Rickettsia typhi were different even though both agents reacted with monoclonal antibodies previously thought specific for R. typhi. The DNA sequence of a portion of the 17-kDa PCR product of the rickettsia-like agent differed significantly from all known rickettsial sequences and resembled the 17-kDa sequences of typhus more than spotted fever group rickettsiae. The rare stable transovarial maintenance of this rickettsia in cat fleas has important implications for the disease potential of cat fleas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.1.43

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azad, A. F., Sacci, J. B., Nelson, W. M., Dasch, G. A., Schmidtmann, E. T., & Carl, M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
43-46
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2078526251
Cited by
153
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 17828)
  • U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
Keywords
Ctenocephalides felis, transovarial transmission, Rickettsia typhi, citrate synthase, spotted fever group rickettsiae, flea-borne pathogens, genetic characterization
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Base Sequence, Cats, DNA, Bacterial, Siphonaptera, Molecular Sequence Data, Rickettsia, Rickettsia Infections, Restriction Mapping, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review