Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of various repetitive DNA elements as genetic markers for strain differentiation and epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Open access
van Soolingen, D, de Haas, P E, Hermans, P W, Groenen, P M, van Embden, J D·1993·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Five different genetic elements have been found to be associated with genetic rearrangements in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Of these elements, the insertion sequence IS6110 is presently the most frequently used genetic marker for strain differentiation of M. tuberculosis. In the present study we compared five genetic elements for their potentials to differentiate a given cluster of M. tuberculosis strains. Because of the presence of only a single copy of IS6110 or two IS6110 copies at the same chromosomal locus, a large number of strains could not be differentiated by IS6110 fingerprinting. Most strains, including the low-copy-number IS6110 strains, could be differentiated by fingerprinting with the 36-bp direct repeat or the polymorphic GC-rich repetitive DNA element. Less discriminative power was obtained with the major polymorphic tandem repeat and the insertion element IS1081. One strain which did not contain IS6110 DNA was encountered. Until now, this element has invariantly been found to be present in all M. tuberculosis complex strains. On the basis of classical taxonomic criteria and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, this strain was shown to be a genuine M. tuberculosis strain. Therefore, the use of this element as a target for polymerase chain reaction-facilitated detection of M. tuberculosis should be reconsidered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.31.8.1987-1995.1993

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
van Soolingen, D., de Haas, P. E., Hermans, P. W., Groenen, P. M., & van Embden, J. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1993-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1987-1995
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1884882993
Cited by
489
References
24
FWCI
20.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of various repetitive DNA elements as genetic markers for strain differentiation and epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.31.8.1987-1995.1993
The paper
van Soolingen, D., de Haas, P. E., Hermans, P. W., Groenen, P. M., & van Embden, J. D. (1993). Comparison of various repetitive DNA elements as genetic markers for strain differentiation and epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.8.1987-1995.1993

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.