The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR
Open accessAbstract
In Staphylococcus aureus, mecA and femA are the genetic determinants of methicillin resistance. By using a multiplex PCR strategy, 310- and 686-bp regions of the mecA and femA genes, respectively, were coamplified to identify susceptible (lacking mecA) and resistant (mecA+) staphylococci and to differentiate S. aureus (femA+) from coagulase-negative staphylococci (lacking femA). A third staphylococcal genomic sequence, corresponding to IS431 and spanning 444 bp, was used as a PCR control. One hundred sixty-five staphylococcal strains were tested. All 72 methicillin-resistant strains were found to be mecA+, and 92 of the 93 susceptible isolates lacked mecA. Only one coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolate carrying the mecA gene was highly susceptible to oxacillin. The femA determinant was a unique feature of S. aureus; it was found in 100% of the S. aureus strains tested but was undetectable in all of the coagulase-negative staphylococci tested. The possibility of directly detecting the mecA and femA genes in blood samples was also investigated. After two amplification steps, a sensitivity of 50 microorganisms per ml of freshly collected spiked blood was achieved. In conclusion, coamplification of mecA and femA determinants proved to be very reliable both for rapid detection of methicillin resistance and differential diagnosis between S. aureus and other staphylococci. This technique, which can be successfully performed with blood samples, could be a useful tool in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of staphylococcal infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Infection with Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Containing the vanA Resistance Gene
Chang, S., Sievert, D. M., Hageman, J. C., Boulton, M. L., Tenover, F. C., Downes, F. P., Shah, S., Rudrik, J. T., Pupp, G. R., Brown, W. J., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa025025 · Cited by 1,095
Strommenger, B., Kettlitz, C., Werner, G., & Witte, W. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.9.4089-4094.2003 · Cited by 578
Species-Specific and Ubiquitous-DNA-Based Assays for Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus
Martineau, F., Picard, F. J., Roy, P. H., Ouellette, M., & Bergeron, M. G. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.36.3.618-623.1998 · Cited by 494
Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2002-2006
Sievert, D. M., Rudrik, J. T., Patel, J. B., McDonald, L. C., Wilkins, M. J., & Hageman, J. C. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/527392 · Cited by 483
Huletsky, A., Giroux, R., Rossbach, V., Gagnon, M., Vaillancourt, M., Bernier, M., Gagnon, F., Truchon, K., Bastien, M., Picard, F. J., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.5.1875-1884.2004 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Vannuffel, P., Gigi, J., Ezzedine, H., Vandercam, B., Delmee, M., Wauters, G., & Gala, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2864-2867
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1749128330
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.33.11.2864-2867.1995
- The paper
- Vannuffel, P., Gigi, J., Ezzedine, H., Vandercam, B., Delmee, M., Wauters, G., & Gala, J. L. (1995). Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species by multiplex PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.33.11.2864-2867.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.