The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differentiation of spotted fever group rickettsiae by sequencing and analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR-amplified DNA of the gene encoding the protein rOmpA
Open accessAbstract
Currently, the genotypic identification of the spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae is based on restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of PCR-amplified genes coding for the enzyme citrate synthase and the surface proteins rOmpA and rOmpB. A set of useful restriction endonucleases was found following comparison of Rickettsia rickettsii and R. prowazekii sequences. However, by using three PCR amplifications and four enzyme digestions with this set, it was impossible to differentiate between all of the known serotypes of the SFG rickettsiae. We amplified by PCR and sequenced using an automated laser fluorescent DNA sequencer a fragment of the gene encoding the protein rOmpA from 21 serotypes of the SFG rickettsiae. A 632-bp amplification product was obtained for most of the strains, although no product could be obtained by using R. akari, R. australis, R. helvetica, and R. bellii DNAs. We found a characteristic sequence for all strains studied except the two isolates of R. massiliae, isolates GS and Mtul. Using the software package BISANCE, we determined the restriction map of this fragment and identified five potentially useful endonucleases, RsaI, AluI, PstI, XbaI, and AvaII. We confirmed the computer analysis-derived profiles by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The combination of the profiles obtained after digestion of the PCR product by RsaI and PstI allowed for the differentiation of 16 strains. The use of AluI and XbaI allowed for the characterization of R. parkeri and strain HA-91, respectively. R. africae and strain S were differentiated by AvaII digestion. Thus, using a single PCR amplification, we were able to differentiate all of the SFG rickettsiae whose ompA gene was amplified by PCR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rickettsia felis: molecular characterization of a new member of the spotted fever group.
Bouyer, D. H., Stenos, J., Crocquet-Valdes, P., Moron, C. G., Popov, V. L., Zavala-Velazquez, J. E., Foil, L. D., Stothard, D. R., Azad, A. F., & Walker, D. H. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-2-339 · Cited by 136
Species of ticks and carried pathogens in owned dogs in Spain: results of a one-year national survey
Estrada-Peña, A., Roura, X., Sainz, A., Miró, G., & Solano-Gallego, L. (2017) · Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.02.001 · Cited by 66
Lauzi, S., Maia, J. P., Epis, S., Marcos, R., Pereira, C., Luzzago, C., Santos, M., Puente-Payo, P., Giordano, A., Pajoro, M., et al. (2016) · Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.05.001 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Roux, V, Fournier, P. E., & Raoult, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2058-2065
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1535091809
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation of spotted fever group rickettsiae by sequencing and analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR-amplified DNA of the gene encoding the protein rOmpA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.34.9.2058-2065.1996
- The paper
- Roux, V, Fournier, P. E., & Raoult, D. (1996). Differentiation of spotted fever group rickettsiae by sequencing and analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR-amplified DNA of the gene encoding the protein rOmpA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.9.2058-2065.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.