The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Identification of Candida Species with Species-Specific DNA Probes
Open accessAbstract
Rapid identification of Candida species has become more important because of an increase in infections caused by species other than Candida albicans , including species innately resistant to azole antifungal drugs. We previously developed a PCR assay with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) format to detect amplicons from the five most common Candida species by using universal fungal primers and species-specific probes directed to the ITS2 region of the gene for rRNA. We designed probes to detect seven additional Candida species ( C. guilliermondii , C. kefyr , C. lambica , C. lusitaniae , C. pelliculosa , C. rugosa , and C. zeylanoides ) included in the API 20C sugar assimilation panel, five probes for species not identified by API 20C ( C. haemulonii , C. norvegica , C. norvegensis , C. utilis , and C. viswanathii ), and a probe for the newly described species C. dubliniensis , creating a panel of 18 Candida species probes. The PCR-EIA correctly identified multiple strains of each species tested, including five identified as C. albicans by the currently available API 20C database but determined to be C. dubliniensis by genotypic and nonroutine phenotypic characteristics. Species identification time was reduced from a mean of 3.5 days by conventional identification methods to 7 h by the PCR-EIA. This method is simple, rapid, and feasible for identifying Candida species in clinical laboratories that utilize molecular identification techniques and provides a novel method to differentiate the new species, C. dubliniensis , from C. albicans .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When CDC and submitting laboratory identifications differed, isolate identification was confirmed by use of a DNA probe-based PCR-enzyme immunoassay method (7, 10).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · Cited by 36,648
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,435
Avoiding false positives with PCR
Kwok, S., & Higuchi, R. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/339237a0 · Cited by 3,407
Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections
Fridkin, S. K., & Jarvis, W. R. (1996) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.9.4.499 · Cited by 782
Sullivan, D. J., Haynes, K. A., Bennett, D. E., Coleman, D. C., & Westerneng, T. J. (1995) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-141-7-1507 · Cited by 763
Epidemiology of Nosocomial Fungal Infections, with Emphasis on Candida Species
Jarvis, W. R. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/20.6.1526 · Cited by 636
Importance of Candida Species Other than C. albicans as Pathogens in Oncology Patients
Wingard, J. R. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/20.1.115 · Cited by 542
Nosocomial Candidemia: Risk Factors and Attributable Mortality
Wenzel, R. P. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/20.6.1531 · Cited by 502
Candida dubliniensis : Characteristics and Identification
Sullivan, D. J., & Coleman, D. C. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.36.2.329-334.1998 · Cited by 383
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Barry, A. L., Nelson, P. W., & Webb, C. D. (1995) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.39.1.40 · Cited by 300
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Westerman J. M. Elie C. M. Morrison C. J. Improved identification of Candida species using biotinylated species-specific DNA probes abstr. J107 Abstracts of the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1998 481 American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hajjeh, R. A., Sofair, A. N., Harrison, L. H., Lyon, G. M., Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., Mirza, S. A., Phelan, M., Morgan, J., Lee-Yang, W., Ciblak, M. A., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.4.1519-1527.2004 · Cited by 649
“based PCR-enzyme immunoassay method (7, 10).”
Combination antifungal therapy
Johnson, M. D., MacDougall, C., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Perfect, J. R., & Rex, J. H. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.3.693-715.2004 · Cited by 541
“Newer technologies can provide nontraditional methods for the estimation of fungal burden levels in human tissues or serum (29, 32, 45, 64, 65, 70, 72, 76, 83, 84, 86, 108, 109, 110, 112, 131, 132, 134, 177, 211, 220, 221), but these assays have generally been developed with the objective of diagnosing disease rather…”
BackgroundRecurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis
Sobel, J. D. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.067 · Cited by 502
Turenne, C. Y., Sanche, S. E., Hoban, D. J., Karlowsky, J. A., & Kabani, A. M. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.6.1846-1851.1999 · Cited by 435
“Amplification techniques, with subsequent probing of the amplicons with species-specific probes or in a PCR-enzyme immunoassay format, have been utilized to overcome the problems of sensitivity, specificity, and delay encountered with conventional methodology (4, 5, 7, 10, 22, 24, 29).”
MethodIwen, P. C., Hinrichs, S. H., & Rupp, M. E. (2002) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/mmy.40.1.87.109 · Cited by 380
Leaw, S. N., Chang, H. C., Sun, H. S., Barton, R., Bouchara, J.-P., & Chang, T. C. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.44.3.693-699.2006 · Cited by 308
“phism (15, 28, 45), DNA probe hybridization (7, 10, 25, 29, 48),”
Rapid Identification of Pathogenic Fungi Directly from Cultures by Using Multiplex PCR
Luo, G., & Mitchell, T. G. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.8.2860-2865.2002 · Cited by 297
“Primers CGL1-CGL2, CTR1-CTR2, and CPA1-CPA2 were combined in one multiplex PCR to identify Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, and Candida parapsilosis, respectively (multiplex G-T-P); primers AFUM1-AFUM2, CALB1-CALB2, and CN5-CN4 were combined in another multiplex PCR to identify A. fumigatus, Candida albicans, and…”
BackgroundInfluentialDhiman, N., Hall, L., Wohlfiel, S. L., Buckwalter, S. P., & Wengenack, N. L. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02381-10 · Cited by 294
“albidus, and Trichosporon asahii) are rare and often require molecular methods for identification at the species level (3, 6, 8, 26, 32).”
BackgroundCurrent Status of Nonculture Methods for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections
Yeo, S. F., & Wong, B. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.3.465-484.2002 · Cited by 277
“tion products in an EIA that provides either a colorimetric or fluorescence readout—was developed (57, 63, 68, 95, 126).”
Chen, Y. C., Eisner, J. D., Kattar, M. M., Rassoulian-Barrett, S. L., LaFe, K., Yarfitz, S. L., Limaye, A. P., & Cookson, B. T. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.6.2302-2310.2000 · Cited by 273
A One-Enzyme PCR-RFLP Assay for Identification of Six Medically Important Candida Species
Mirhendi, H., Makimura, K., Khoramizadeh, M., & Yamaguchi, H. (2006) · Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi · doi:10.3314/jjmm.47.225 · Cited by 246
Comparison of the epidemiology, drug resistance mechanisms, and virulence of and
Sullivan, D. J., Moran, G. P., Pinjon, E., Mosaid, A. A., Stokes, C. R., Vaughan, C. W., & Coleman, D. C. (2003) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1016/s1567-1356(03)00240-x · Cited by 234
Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.
Ellepola, A. N. B., & Morrison, C. J. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 209
Self-citationPryce, T. M., Palladino, S., Kay, I. D., & Coombs, G. W. (2003) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/13693780310001600435 · Cited by 207
Yeast identification – past, present, and future methods
Pincus, D., Orenga, S., & Chatellier, S. (2007) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/13693780601059936 · Cited by 196
Leinberger, D. M., Schumacher, U., Autenrieth, I. B., & Bachmann, T. T. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.10.4943-4953.2005 · Cited by 155
“This PCR-EIA (11) discriminates the different fungal species by applying the variability of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region 2 (ITS2).”
MethodDonnelly, S. M., Sullivan, D. J., Shanley, D. B., & Coleman, D. C. (1999) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-145-8-1871 · Cited by 153
“Another study by Elie et al. (1998) reported the development of a C. dubliniensis probe, specific for the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS2) of the ribosomal gene cluster.”
Rapid Identification of Dimorphic and Yeast-Like Fungal Pathogens Using Specific DNA Probes
Lindsley, M. D., Hurst, S. F., Iqbal, N. J., & Morrison, C. J. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.39.10.3505-3511.2001 · Cited by 148
“The present study employed a modification of a PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) method (10, 11) for amplification and differentiation of the major fungal pathogens that possess a yeast-like morphology in vivo.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationChen, S. C. ‐., Halliday, C. L., & Meyer, W. (2002) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/mmy.40.4.333.357 · Cited by 135
A molecular phylogeny of Pythium insidiosum
Schurko, A. M., Mendoza, L., Lévesque, C. A., Désaulniers, N. L., de Cock, A. W. A. M., & Klassen, G. R. (2003) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1017/s0953756203007718 · Cited by 126
Rapid Identification of Yeasts in Positive Blood Cultures by a Multiplex PCR Method
Chang, H. C., Leaw, S. N., Huang, A., Wu, T. L., & Chang, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.39.10.3466-3471.2001 · Cited by 122
Candida dubliniensis, a new fungal pathogen
Fernández, J. G., Morales, P., González, M. A., & Quindós, G. (2002) · Journal of Basic Microbiology · doi:10.1002/1521-4028(200206)42:3 · Cited by 118
Recovery of Candida dubliniensis from Non-Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in Israel
Polacheck, I., Strahilevitz, J., Sullivan, D. J., Donnelly, S. M., Salkin, I. F., & Coleman, D. C. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.1.170-174.2000 · Cited by 114
Non-culture based diagnostic tests for mycotic infections
Reiss, E., Obayashi, T., Orle, K. A., Yoshida, M., & Zancopé‐Oliveira, R. M. (2000) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/mmy.38.s1.147.159 · Cited by 108
Self-citationCandida dubliniensisFungemia: the First Four Cases in North America
Brandt, M. E., Harrison, L. H., Pass, M. A., Sofair, A. N., Huie, S., Li, R.-K., Morrison, C. J., Warnock, D. W., & Hajjeh, R. A. (2000) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0601.000108 · Cited by 107
“The identification was confirmed by reactivity of DNA with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-enzyme immunoassay (EIA) probe specific for this species (10) and by PCR amplification of a region containing the novel C.”
Self-citationBorst, A., Raimer, M. T., Warnock, D. W., Morrison, C. J., & Arthington, B. A. (2005) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.49.2.783-787.2005 · Cited by 107
“PCR-enzyme immunoassay as described previously (7).”
Self-citationHocking, A. D., Thrane, U., Samson, R. A., & Pitt, J. I. (2006) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/0-387-28391-9 · Cited by 101
Development of a PCR-Based Line Probe Assay for Identification of Fungal Pathogens
Martin, C. M., Roberts, D., van der Weide, M., Rossau, R., Jannes, G., Smith, T., & Maher, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.10.3735-3742.2000 · Cited by 98
“Recently several authors have described PCR assays targeting different regions of the fungal genome for detection of Candida (9, 38) and Aspergillus (10, 18, 27, 32) species.”
BackgroundRapid identification of candida species by TaqMan PCR
Guiver, M., Levi, K., & Oppenheim, B. A. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.54.5.362 · Cited by 97
Species identification of medically important fungi by use of real-time LightCycler PCR
Hsu, M.-C., Chen, K.-W., Lo, H., Chen, Y., Liao, M.-H., Lin, Y., & Li, S. (2003) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.05302-0 · Cited by 96
“CALB1 TTTATCAACTTGTCACACCAGA � 273 L47111 CALB2 ATCCCGCCTTACCACTACCG L28817 Candida glabrata CGL1 TTATCACACGACTCGACACT � 423 AB032177 CGL2 CCCACATACTGATATGGCCTACAA AF167993 Candida guilliermondii CGU1 GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC � 315 AX592669 CGU2 GTTTGGTTGTTGTAAGGCCGGG Elie et al. (1998) Candida krusei CKRU1 GCATCGATGAAGAA…”
InfluentialOliveira, K., Haase, G., Kurtzman, C. P., Hyldig‐Nielsen, J. J., & Stender, H. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.39.11.4138-4141.2001 · Cited by 93
“These methods include fatty acid methyl ester analysis (14), PCR methods (2, 8, 12), DNA fingerprinting (5), -D-glucosidase activity (19), growth at 42 and 45°C (16, 23, 25), and chlamydospore formation (10, 24, 25).”
MethodAntifungal drug resistance: do molecular methods provide a way forward?
Perlin, D. S. (2009) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/qco.0b013e3283321ce5 · Cited by 89
“The detection of ribosomal genes, 18S or 28S [38,39], or intervening noncoding regions, ITS1 and ITS2 [ 40 ], facilitate accurate detection of genera and species.”
MethodTobacco Agar, a New Medium for Differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans
Khan, Z. U., Ahmad, S., Mokaddas, E. M., & Chandy, R. G. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.10.4796-4798.2004 · Cited by 83
“dubliniensis, but these tests are labor-intensive and may not be readily available (2, 5, 6).”
BackgroundGee, S. F., Joly, S., Soll, D. R., Meis, J. F. G. M., Verweij, P. E., Polacheck, I., Sullivan, D. J., & Coleman, D. C. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.2.556-574.2002 · Cited by 83
“Phenotype-based tests such as the analysis of carbohydrate assimilation profiles using commercial yeast identification systems (38), growth temperature (39), differentially colored primary colonies on CHROMagar Candida medium (8, 34), chlamydospore production and colony morphology on birdseed agar (1, 53), and molecul…”
MethodShin, J. H., Nolte, F. S., Holloway, B. P., & Morrison, C. J. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.1.165-170.1999 · Cited by 82
“cerevisiae has been shown to be species specific in preliminary tests (8).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRapid Identification of Candida dubliniensis Using a Species-Specific Molecular Beacon
Park, S., Wong, M., Marras, S. A. E., Cross, E. W., Kiehn, T. E., Chaturvedi, V. P., Tyagi, S., & Perlin, D. S. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.8.2829-2836.2000 · Cited by 79
“dubliniensis were designed on the basis of published probe sequences (11) that were independently confirmed by DNA sequence analysis at the New York University DNA sequencing facility.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCandida dubliniensis: An update.
Sullivan, D. J., Moran, G. P., Donnelly, S. M., Gee, S. F., Pinjon, E., McCartan, B. E., Shanley, D. B., & Coleman, D. C. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 79
Kanbe, T., Horii, T., Arishima, T., Ozeki, M., & Kikuchi, A. (2002) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.892 · Cited by 78
“Transcribed spacer (ITS) I or the ITS II region of fungal rRNA genes have often been targeted in many molecular biology-based identifications of fungi (Chen et al., 2000; Elie et al., 1998; Kurtzman et al., 1997; Turenne et al., 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialde Aguirre, L., Hurst, S. F., Choi, J. S., Shin, J. H., Hinrikson, H. P., & Morrison, C. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.8.3495-3504.2004 · Cited by 74
“of the 28S rDNA region for each fungal species, as previously described (16, 68); and (ii) the fungus-specific, universal primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 (Table 3) was”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCurrent Status and Future Perspectives on Molecular and Serological Methods in Diagnostic Mycology
Lau, A. F., Chen, W., Sleiman, S., & Sorrell, T. C. (2009) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.09.70 · Cited by 74
“)* Culture [82,148,212,213,455–457]”
Multiplex PCR identification of eight clinically relevantCandidaspecies
Carvalho, A., Costa‐de‐Oliveira, S., Martins, M. D. L., Pina‐Vaz, C., Rodrigues, A. G., Ludovico, P., & Rodrigues, F. J. S. (2007) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/13693780701501787 · Cited by 70
Sequencing as a tool in yeast molecular taxonomy
Valente, P., Ramos, J. P., & Leoncini, O. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/cjm-45-11-949 · Cited by 68
Yeasts and filamentous fungi in bottled mineral water and tap water from municipal supplies
Yamaguchi, M. U., Rampazzo, . D. C. P., Yamada‐Ogatta, S. F., Nakamura, C. V., Ueda‐Nakamura, T., & Filho, B. P. D. (2007) · Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology · doi:10.1590/s1516-89132007000100001 · Cited by 69
“There are now at least 17 species of Candida that have been shown to cause diseases in human (Elie et al., 1998) and the list of yeast that can cause diseases are rising.”
BackgroundIdentification of clinically relevant yeasts by PCR/RFLP
Trost, A., Graf, B., Eucker, J., Sezer, O., Possinger, K., Göbel, U. B., & Adam, T. (2003) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2003.10.007 · Cited by 69
Bautista-Muñoz, C. D. C., Boldo‐León, X. M., Villa‐Tanaca, L., & Hernández-Rodríguez, C. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.1.414-420.2003 · Cited by 68
“Several PCR methods for the differentiation of some Candida species have been reported (2, 9, 10, 14, 15, 27, 28).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClinical aspects related to endodontic yeast infections
Waltimo, T. M. T., Haapasalo, M., Zehnder, M., & Meyer, J. (2004) · Endodontic Topics · doi:10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00086.x · Cited by 66
Borst, A., Theelen, B., Reinders, E., Boekhout, T., Fluit, A. C., & Savelkoul, P. H. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.4.1357-1362.2003 · Cited by 66
“dubliniensisspecific PCR assays as well as generic PCR assays in combination with species-specific probes have been developed (6, 7, 16, 19, 25).”
Rapid Identification of Commonly EncounteredCandidaSpecies Directly from Blood Culture Bottles
Selvarangan, R., Bui, U. T. T., Limaye, A. P., & Cookson, B. T. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.12.5660-5664.2003 · Cited by 66
“They include amplification of a target gene(s) followed by a postamplification analysis step to identify the amplicons based on electrophoretic migration or by hybridization with specific nucleotide probes (6, 7, 10, 13, 22).”
MethodDiaz, M. R., & Fell, J. W. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.8.3662-3672.2005 · Cited by 66
“A sensitivity of 1 ng was reported for the identification of Candida species by the use of PCR-EIA (22).”
MethodTransient Fungemia Caused by an Amphotericin B-Resistant Isolate of Candida haemulonii
Rodero, L., Cuenca‐Estrella, M., Córdoba, S. B., Cahn, P. E., Davel, G., Kaufman, S. C., Guelfand, L. I., & Rodrı́guez-Tudela, J. L. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.6.2266-2269.2002 · Cited by 65
“haemulonii has been recognized as one of the most frequently occurring human pathogenic Candida species by experts designing DNAbased systems for the rapid identification of yeast species (3, 12).”
BackgroundAdvances in molecular detection of Aspergillus: an update
Abdin, M. Z., Ahmad, M. M., & Javed, S. (2010) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-010-0563-y · Cited by 63
“Elie et al. (1998), however, had found the detection limit 10 times less than Hinrikson et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInfections due to Candida haemulonii: species identification, antifungal susceptibility and outcomes
Ruan, S., Kuo, Y.-W., Huang, C., Hsiue, E. H.-C., & Hsueh, P. (2009) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.08.009 · Cited by 59
Mills, B. B. (2017) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2017.02.010 · Cited by 59
Candida lusitaniae: Biology, Pathogenicity, Virulence Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Mendoza-Reyes, D. F., Gómez-Gaviria, M., & Mora-Montes, H. M. (2022) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s383785 · Cited by 61
“lusitaniae.(119) For this, universal fungal”
BackgroundGutzmer, R., Mommert, S., Küttler, U., Werfel, T., & Kapp, A. (2004) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.45779-0 · Cited by 54
“The ITS regions and adjacent rDNA were also successfully usedinpreviousstudies todetectanddifferentiateyeasts tothe species level with a variety of PCR methods (Ahmad et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2000; Elie et al., 1998; Lindsley et al., 2001; Selvarangan et al., 2002; Shin et al., 1997).”
BackgroundBašková, L., Landlinger, C., Preuner, S., & Lion, T. (2007) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.47212-0 · Cited by 54
“The use of agents with a narrower spectrum of antifungal activity, such as fluconazole or amphotericin B, would require the identification of the fungal species present, which can be performed by a number of molecular techniques, including, for example, the analysis of the variable ITS2 region or species-specific hybr…”
BackgroundAhmad, S., Khan, Z., Mokaddas, E. M., & Khan, Z. U. (2004) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.05315-0 · Cited by 54
“dubliniensis since the DNA sequence of the ITS2 of the rDNA is regarded as species-specific for various Candida species (Elie et al., 1998; Gee et al., 2002; Fujita et al., 1995).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEllepola, A. N. B., Hurst, S. F., Elie, C. M., & Morrison, C. J. (2003) · Oral Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1046/j.0902-0055.2003.00103.x · Cited by 53
Self-citationZeng, X., Kong, F., Halliday, C. L., Chen, S. C.-J., Lau, A. F., Playford, E. G., & Sorrell, T. C. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00687-07 · Cited by 53
“In particular, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, ITS1 and ITS2, of the fungal ribosomal DNA gene complex, have shown promise as targets for species identification in a variety of formats, including DNA sequencing and DNA probe hybridization (9, 13, 22).”
BackgroundCandida dubliniensis at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia
Fotedar, R., & Al‐Hedaithy, S. S. A. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.5.1907-1911.2003 · Cited by 52
“In addition, the use of molecular techniques has significantly revolutionized investigations of various aspects of this yeast pathogen (8).”
BackgroundFungal infections in patients with cystic fibrosis
Nagano, Y., Millar, B. C., Johnson, E. M., Goldsmith, C. E., Elborn, J. S., Rendall, J. C., & Moore, J. E. (2007) · Reviews in Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1097/mrm.0b013e3282e1c70a · Cited by 50
Boyanton, B. L., Luna, R. A., Fasciano, L. R., Menne, K. G., & Versalovic, J. A. (2008) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2008-132-667-dpiopc · Cited by 49
Candida identification: a journey from conventional to molecular methods in medical mycology
Alam, M. Z., Alam, Q., Jiman-Fatani, A. A., Kamal, M. A., Abuzenadah, A. M., Chaudhary, A., Akram, M., & Haque, A. (2013) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-013-1574-z · Cited by 48
Resolution of Discrepant Results for Candida Species Identification by Using DNA Probes
Coignard, C., Hurst, S. F., Benjamin, L. E., Brandt, M. E., Warnock, D. W., & Morrison, C. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.2.858-861.2004 · Cited by 41
“Discrepancies in species identification between the CDC’s phenotypic methods and the PCR-EIA were resolved by rDNA sequencing on a Perkin-Elmer ABI Prism 310 automated capillary DNA sequencer as previously described (7).”
MethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationPosteraro, B., Sanguinetti, M., Masucci, L., Romano, L., Morace, G., & Fadda, G. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.4.1609-1614.2000 · Cited by 41
“guilliermondii (5) 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2”
BackgroundInfluentialDas, S., Brown, T. M., Kellar, K. L., Holloway, B. P., & Morrison, C. J. (2005) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2005.00031.x · Cited by 40
Self-citationKim, D., Shin, W., Lee, K. H., Kim, K., Park, J. Y., & Koh, C.-M. (2002) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.891 · Cited by 39
“Recently, molecular methods including PCR have also been studied (Elie et al., 1998; Mannarelli and Kurtzman, 1998; Shin et al., 1997; Weissman et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodLandlinger, C., Bašková, L., Preuner, S., Willinger, B., Buchta, V., & Lion, T. (2008) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/s10096-008-0683-3 · Cited by 39
Development of a Species-Specific Probe forPythium insidiosumand the Diagnosis of Pythiosis
Schurko, A. M., Mendoza, L., de Cock, A. W. A. M., Bedard, J. E. J., & Klassen, G. R. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.6.2411-2418.2004 · Cited by 39
“Species-specific probes have been described for several Candida species (8, 9, 15), Trichophyton rubrum (14), and a variety of other fungal pathogens (13, 29, 44, 45).”
BackgroundMillar, B. C., Moore, J. E., Xu, J., Walker, M. J., Hedderwick, S. A., & McMullan, R. (2002) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01135.x · Cited by 39
“Consequently several genotypic diagnostic assays have been developed to aid in the identification of this novel species (Elie et al. 1998).”
BackgroundMolecular and phenotypic identification of the yeast pathogen Candida dubliniensis
Kurzai, O., Korting, H.-C., Harmsen, D., Bautsch, W., Molitor, M., Frosch, M., & Mühlschlegel, F. A. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001090000142 · Cited by 38
“different isolates of a single species [25, 29].”
Fungal infections of the eye--laboratory diagnosis and treatment.
Nayak, N. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 37
Trama, J. P., Mordechai, E., & Adelson, M. E. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Probes · doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2004.10.004 · Cited by 37
Marot-Leblond, A., Beucher, B., David, S., Nail-Billaud, S., & Robert, R. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.44.1.138-142.2006 · Cited by 37
“At present, the most accurate means of differentiating between isolates of these two species is based on molecular biology-based techniques (5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 30).”
BackgroundLaboratory diagnosis of invasive mycoses
O’Shaughnessy, E. M., Shea, Y. M., & Witebsky, F. G. (2003) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0891-5520(02)00069-7 · Cited by 37
Xiang, H., Xiong, L., Liu, X., & Tu, Z. (2007) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2007.01.011 · Cited by 36
Evidence for a Pseudo-Outbreak of Candida guilliermondii Fungemia in a University Hospital in Brazil
Medeiros, E. A., Lott, T. J., Colombo, A. L., Godoy, P., Coutinho, A. P., Braga, M. S., Nucci, M., & Brandt, M. E. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01878-06 · Cited by 35
“clade (3) or through direct DNA sequencing of ribosomal DNA.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPlayford, E. G., Kong, F., Sun, Y. C., Wang, H., Halliday, C. L., & Sorrell, T. C. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.44.3.876-880.2006 · Cited by 35
“guilliermondii probe and Candida zeylanoides DNA product noted previously (5).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDisseminated Mucormycosis Caused by Absidia corymbifera Leading to Cerebral Vasculitis
Eucker, J., Sezer, O., Lehmann, R., Weber, J. R., Graf, B., Denkert, C., Brück, W., Schweigert, M., & Possinger, K. (2000) · Infection · doi:10.1007/s150100070047 · Cited by 34
Molecular fingerprinting methods for the discrimination between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis
Neppelenbroek, K. H., Bombarda, N. H. C., Spolidório, D. M. P., Spolidório, L. C., Seó, R., & Pavarina, A. C. (2006) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01189.x · Cited by 34
Metwally, L. A., Hogg, G., Coyle, P. V., Hay, R. J., Hedderwick, S. A., McCloskey, B., O’Neill, H. J., Ong, G., Thompson, G., Webb, C. H., et al. (2007) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.47149-0 · Cited by 33
Lasker, B. A., Elie, C. M., Lott, T. J., Espinel-Ingroff, A. V., Gallagher, L., Kuykendall, R. J., Kellum, M. E., Pruitt, W. R., Warnock, D. W., Rimland, D., et al. (2001) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/mmy.39.4.341.352 · Cited by 33
Self-citationAmir, L. H., Cullinane, M., Garland, S. M., Tabrizi, S. N., Donath, S. M., Bennett, C. M., Cooklin, A., Fisher, J., & Payne, M. S. (2011) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-54 · Cited by 32
“To increase sensitivity for the detection of Candida spp from the nipple, a flocked swab is resuspended in 1× Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and DNA extracted from this is subsequently used in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which has been used previously to successfully identify Candida spp [41,42].”
MethodLoeffler, J., Hebart, H. F., Magga, S., Schmidt, D., Klingspor, L., Tollemar, J. G., Schumacher, U., & Einsele, H. (2000) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00201-7 · Cited by 31
Rapid and simple differentiation of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans
Graf, B., Trost, A., Eucker, J., Göbel, U. B., & Adam, T. (2004) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2003.09.016 · Cited by 31
“Other methods to distinguish the 2 Candida species are either long to perform, difficult to reproduce, expensive or require equipment not normally available in diagnostic laboratories (Elie et al., 1998; Pinjon et al., 1998; Posteraro et al., 2000; Tintelnot et al., 2000; Mahmoudabadi et al., 2002; McIlhatton et al.,…”
MethodXu, J., Millar, B. C., Moore, J. E., McClurg, R., Walker, M. J., Evans, J., Hedderwick, S., & McMullan, R. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.55.10.774 · Cited by 31
Vulvovaginal candidiasis in a Flemish patient population
Vos, M. M. D., Cuenca‐Estrella, M., Boekhout, T., Theelen, B., Matthijs, N., Bauters, T. G. M., Nailis, H., Dhont, M. A., Rodríguez-Tudela, J. L., & Nelis, H. J. C. F. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01281.x · Cited by 30
“[13].”
Deak, E., Etienne, K. A., Lockhart, S. R., Gade, L., Chiller, T., & Balajee, S. A. (2010) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w10-003 · Cited by 29
Marot-Leblond, A., Grimaud, L., David, S., Sullivan, D. J., Coleman, D. C., Pontón, J., & Robert, R. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.11.4956-4960.2004 · Cited by 26
“albicans requires the use of molecular biology-based techniques, such as DNA fingerprinting analysis with repetitive sequence-containing DNA probes, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, PCR analysis, or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 21, 22, 35).”
MethodHasanvand, S., Qomi, H. A., Kord, M., & Didehdar, M. (2017) · Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.5812/jjm.12804 · Cited by 27
“However, traditional methods are sometimes time-consuming and inefficient to identify the involved species (15, 16).”
BackgroundWang, Q., Li, J., Wang, S., & Bai, F. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02223-07 · Cited by 24
“These methods include DNA probe hybridization (11, 15), multiplex PCR (42) and real-time PCR assays (25, 55), PCR-enzyme immunoassays (41), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of 5.”
MethodrDNA-RFLP identification ofCandidaspecies in immunocompromised and seriously diseased patients
Pinto, P. M., de Resende, M. A., Koga‐Ito, C. Y., Ferreira, J. A. G., & Tendler, M. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w04-025 · Cited by 24
Evaluation of molecular methods for the analysis of yeasts in foods and beverages
Beh, A., Fleet, G. H., Prakitchaiwattana, C., & Heard, G. M. (2006) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/0-387-28391-9_4 · Cited by 23
Galán, A., Veses, V., Murgui, A., Casanova, M., & MartÃnez, J. P. (2006) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00114.x · Cited by 22
A comparison between CHROMagar, PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP for identification of Candida species
Jafari, Z., Motamedi, M., Jalalizand, N., Shokoohi, G., Charsizadeh, A., & Mirhendi, H. (2017) · Current Medical Mycology · doi:10.29252/cmm.3.3.10 · Cited by 22
“Among the various molecular techniques, the best known methods include specific primers in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiplex PCR [13], specific probes for each species [14], PCR-restriction fragments length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) [15], sequencing of specific regions of genome [16], real-time PCR [17], and…”
MethodFotedar, R., & Al‐Hedaithy, S. S. A. (2004) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.00973.x · Cited by 21
The Role of PCR in the Diagnosis of Candida Vulvovaginitis—a New Gold Standard?
Sobel, J. D., & Akins, R. A. (2015) · Current Infectious Disease Reports · doi:10.1007/s11908-015-0488-3 · Cited by 19
Pérez-García, L. A., Macías-Pérez, J. R., León‐Buitimea, A., Alvarado‐Sánchez, B., Ramírez-Quijas, M. D., Navarro-Arias, M. J., & Rodríguez-Reyes, S. C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64113-3_3 · Cited by 17
A new ultrasonic high-throughput instrument for rapid DNA release from microorganisms
Hohnadel, M., Felden, L., Fijuljanin, D., Jouette, S., & Chollet, R. (2014) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2014.02.004 · Cited by 16
Milde, K., Kostka, V., Kaleta, E. F., Willems, H., & Jäger, C. (2000) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00248-0 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Elie, C. M., Lott, T. J., Reiss, E., & Morrison, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3260-3265
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- PMC
- PMC105312
- OpenAlex
- W2152603420
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Georgia State University
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- Candida species identification, species-specific DNA probes, Candida dubliniensis, Candida albicans, non-albicans Candida, azole resistance
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Digoxigenin, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Genotype, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Mycology, Phenotype, Sensitivity and Specificity, Species Specificity, DNA Probes, Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review