The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coinfection with Multiple Tick-Borne Pathogens in a Walker Hound Kennel in North Carolina
Open accessAbstract
Both dogs and humans can be coinfected with various Ehrlichia,Bartonella,Rickettsia, and Babesia species. We investigated a kennel of sick Walker Hounds and their owners in southeastern North Carolina for evidence of tick-borne infections and associated risk factors. A high degree of coinfection was documented in the dog population. Of the 27 dogs, 26 were seroreactive to an Ehrlichia sp., 16 to Babesia canis, and 25 to Bartonella vinsonii, and 22 seroconverted to Rickettsia rickettsii antigens. According to PCR results, 15 dogs were infected with Ehrlichia canis, 9 with Ehrlichia chaffeensis, 8 with Ehrlichia ewingii, 3 with Ehrlichia equi, 9 with Ehrlichia platys, 20 with a Rickettsia species, 16 with a Bartonella species, and 7 with B. canis. The detection of DNA from any Ehrlichia species was associated with clinical illness and with concurrent B. canis infection (by PCR). Both E. canis and an uncharacterized Rickettsia species appeared to result in chronic or recurrent infection. Death in the dog population was associated with living in a dirt lot rather than the concrete kennel. Of 23 people on whom serologic testing was conducted, eight were seroreactive to Bartonella henselae, one to E. chaffeensis, and one to R. rickettsii antigen; however, none had clinical or hematologic abnormalities consistent with illness caused by these organisms. We conclude that kennel dogs with heavy tick exposure can be infected at a high rate with multiple, potentially zoonotic, tick-borne pathogens. In addition, our findings further illustrate the utility of PCR for documenting coinfection with tick-transmitted pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Factors associated with the rapid emergence of zoonotic Bartonella infections
Boulouis, H.-J., Chao-chin, C., Henn, J. B., Kasten, R. W., & Chomel, B. B. (2005) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2005009 · Cited by 371
Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs
Shaw, S. E., Day, M. J., Birtles, R. J., & Breitschwerdt, E. B. (2001) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4922(00)01856-0 · Cited by 343
Self-citationTransmission of Bartonella henselae by Ixodes ricinus
Cotté, V., Bonnet, S., Le Rhun, D., Le Naour, E., Chauvin, A., Boulouis, H.-J., Lecuelle, B., Lilin, T., & Vayssier-Taussat, M. (2008) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1407.071110 · Cited by 257
Cat scratch disease and other zoonotic Bartonella infections
Chomel, B. B., Boulouis, H. J., & Breitschwerdt, E. B. (2004) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.2004.224.1270 · Cited by 189
Self-citationImported and travelling dogs as carriers of canine vector-borne pathogens in Germany
Menn, B., Lorentz, S., & Naucke, T. J. (2010) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-34 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Kordick, S. K., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Hegarty, B. C., Southwick, K. L., Colitz, C. M., Hancock, S. I., Bradley, J. M., Rumbough, R., Mcpherson, J. T., & MacCormack, J. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2631-2638
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2107529929
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coinfection with Multiple Tick-Borne Pathogens in a Walker Hound Kennel in North Carolina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.37.8.2631-2638.1999
- The paper
- Kordick, S. K., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Hegarty, B. C., Southwick, K. L., Colitz, C. M., Hancock, S. I., Bradley, J. M., Rumbough, R., Mcpherson, J. T., & MacCormack, J. N. (1999). Coinfection with Multiple Tick-Borne Pathogens in a Walker Hound Kennel in North Carolina. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.8.2631-2638.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.