The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi
Open accessAbstract
A multiplex real-time PCR assay was developed for the simultaneous detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi . The assay was tested on various Anaplasma , Borrelia , Erhlichia , and Rickettsia species, as well as on Bartonella henselae and Escherichia coli , and the assay was found to be highly specific for A. phagocytophilum and the Borrelia species tested ( B. burgdorferi , B. parkeri , B. andersonii , and B. bissettii ). The analytical sensitivity of the assay is comparable to that of previously described nested PCR assays ( A. phagocytophilum , 16S rRNA; B. burgdorferi , fla gene), amplifying the equivalent of one-eighth of an A. phagocytophilum -infected cell and 50 borrelia spirochetes. The dynamic range of the assay for both A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi was ≥4 logs of magnitude. Purified DNA from A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi was spiked into DNA extracted from uninfected ticks and from negative control mouse and human bloods, and these background DNAs were shown to have no significant effect on sensitivity or specificity of the assay. The assay was tested on field-collected Ixodes scapularis ticks and shown to have 100% concordance compared to previously described non-probe-based PCR assays. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a real-time multiplex PCR assay that can be used for the simultaneous and rapid screening of samples for A. phagocytophilum and Borrelia species, two of the most common tick-borne infectious agents in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anaplasma phagocytophilum—a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies
Stuen, S., Granquist, E. G., & Silaghi, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00031 · Cited by 603
STENOS, J., GRAVES, S. R., & UNSWORTH, N. B. (2005) · The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2005.73.1083 · Cited by 299
Ticks and associated pathogens collected from dogs and cats in Belgium
Claerebout, E., Losson, B., Cochez, C., Casaert, S., Dalemans, A.-C., De Cat, A., Madder, M., Saegerman, C., Heyman, P., & Lempereur, L. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-183 · Cited by 119
Hamel, D., Silaghi, C., Lescai, D., & Pfister, K. (2012) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-011-2659-y · Cited by 82
Król, N., Obiegala, A., Pfeffer, M., Lonc, E., & Kiewra, D. (2016) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1632-0 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Courtney, J. W., Kostelnik, L. M., Zeidner, N. S., & Massung, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3164-3168
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2102801292
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.42.7.3164-3168.2004
- The paper
- Courtney, J. W., Kostelnik, L. M., Zeidner, N. S., & Massung, R. F. (2004). Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.7.3164-3168.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.