Cited by 9Evaluation of Teaching PracticesInnovative Teaching MethodsScience Education and Pedagogy

CREATE Two-Year/Four-Year Faculty Workshops: A Focus on Practice, Reflection, and Novel Curricular Design Leads to Diverse Gains for Faculty at Two-Year and Four-Year Institutions

Open access
Hoskins, Sally G., Gottesman, Alan J., Kenyon, Kristy L.·2017·Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education

Abstract

Improving STEM education through the propagation of highly effective teaching strategies is a major goal of national reform movements. CREATE (Consider, Read, Elucidate the hypotheses, Analyze and interpret the data, and Think of the next Experiment) is a transformative teaching and learning strategy grounded in evidence-based science pedagogy. CREATE courses promote both cognitive (e.g., critical thinking) and affective (e.g., attitudinal and epistemological) student gains in diverse settings. In this study, we look more deeply into the faculty development workshop used to disseminate CREATE pedagogy to instructors at two-year and four-year institutions. We hypothesized that an immersive experience would positively shift faculty participants’ views on teaching/learning, build their understanding of CREATE pedagogy and develop their confidence for course implementation. Internal and external assessments indicate that faculty participants did achieve gains within the timeframe of the CREATE workshop. We discuss the workshop training outcomes in the context of designing effective dissemination models for innovative practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1365

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since then, the authors and others have revised and implemented the CREATE method in different contexts, with many publications discussing modifications of this approach, assessment of students' cognitive and affective changes, as well as ways to train and support faculty in implementing this technique.

    “Since then, the authors and others have revised and implemented the CREATE method in different contexts, with many publications discussing modifications of this approach, assessment of students’ cognitive and affective changes, as well as ways to train and support faculty in implementing this technique (Hoskins et al., 2007, 2017; Hoskins, 2008, 2010, 2019; Gottesman and Hoskins, 2013; Stevens and”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]American Association for the Advancement of Science 2011 Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action: a summary of recommendations made at a national conference organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science July 15–17, 2009 Washington, DC
  2. [5]American Association for the Advancement of Science 2015 Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: chronicling change, inspiring the future Final report of a national conference organized by AAAS with support from the National Science Foundation Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/chronicling-change
  3. [18]American Association of Physics Teachers 2014 Workshop for new faculty http://www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/nfw.cfm
  4. [27]Vygotsky LS 1986 Thought and language Kozulin A The MIT Press Cambridge, MA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoskins, S. G., Gottesman, A. J., & Kenyon, K. L.
Affiliations
  • City College of New York (US)
  • Hobart and William Smith Colleges (US)
Corresponding author
Kenyon, Kristy L.
Venue
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Published
2017-12
Volume
18
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1935-7877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-7885
OpenAlex
W2774900372
Cited by
9
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
faculty development workshops, STEM education reform, two-year and four-year institutions, faculty confidence, curricular design, student diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review