The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficiency of reinitiation of translation on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mRNAs is determined by the length of the upstream open reading frame and by intercistronic distance
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we examined the mechanism of translation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat mRNA in eucaryotic cells. This mRNA contains the tat open reading frame (ORF), followed by rev and nef ORFs, but only the first ORF, encoding tat, is efficiently translated. Introduction of premature stop codons in the tat ORF resulted in efficient translation of the downstream rev ORF. We show that the degree of inhibition of translation of rev is proportional to the length of the upstream tat ORF. An upstream ORF spanning 84 nucleotides was predicted to inhibit 50% of the ribosomes from initiating translation at downstream AUGs. Interestingly, the distance between the upstream ORF and the start codon of the second ORF also played a role in efficiency of downstream translation initiation. It remains to be investigated if these conclusions relate to translation of mRNAs other than human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mRNAs. The strong inhibition of rev translation exerted by the presence of the tat ORF may reflect the different roles of Tat and Rev in the viral life cycle. Tat acts early to induce high production of all viral mRNAs. Rev induces a switch from the early to the late phase of the viral life cycle, resulting in production of viral structural proteins and virions. Premature Rev production may result in entrance into the late phase in the presence of suboptimal levels of viral mRNAs coding for structural proteins, resulting in inefficient virus production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kozak, M. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2 · Cited by 4,741
Malim, M. H., Hauber, J., Le, S.-Y., Maizel, J. V., & Cullen, B. R. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338254a0 · Cited by 1,280
Cited by
The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation
Jackson, R. J., Hellen, C. U. T., & Pestova, T. V. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2838 · Cited by 2,759
Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Kozak, M. (1999) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00210-3 · Cited by 1,364
Untranslated regions of mRNAs.
(2002) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews0004 · Cited by 987
Upstream Open Reading Frames as Regulators of mRNA Translation
Morris, D. R., & Geballe, A. P. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.23.8635-8642.2000 · Cited by 736
Upstream ORFs are prevalent translational repressors in vertebrates
Johnstone, T. G., Bazzini, A. A., & Giraldez, A. J. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201592759 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Luukkonen, B. G., Tan, W., & Schwartz, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4086-4094
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2097409962
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency of reinitiation of translation on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mRNAs is determined by the length of the upstream open reading frame and by intercistronic distance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.69.7.4086-4094.1995
- The paper
- Luukkonen, B. G., Tan, W., & Schwartz, S. (1995). Efficiency of reinitiation of translation on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mRNAs is determined by the length of the upstream open reading frame and by intercistronic distance. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.69.7.4086-4094.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.