The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS–CoV-2/COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
As we enter the second quarter of the COVID-19 pandemic, with testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV-2) increasingly available (though still limited and/or slow in some areas), we are faced with new questions and challenges regarding this novel virus. When to test? Whom to test? What to test? How often to test? And, what to do with test results? Since SARS–CoV-2 is a new virus, there is little evidence to fall back on for test utilization and diagnostic stewardship (1). Several points need to be considered to begin answering of these questions; specifically, what types of tests are available and under which circumstances are they useful? This understanding can help guide the use of testing at the local, regional, state, and national levels and inform those assessing the supply chain to ensure that needed testing is and continues to be available. Here, we explain the types of tests available and how they might be useful in the face of a rapidly changing and never-before-experienced situation. There are two broad categories of SARS–CoV-2 tests: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s response to the virus. Each will be considered separately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients
Zou, L., Ruan, F., Huang, M., Liang, L., Huang, H., Hong, Z., Yu, J., Kang, M., Song, Y., Xia, J., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2001737 · Cited by 4,810
Negative Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs Do Not Rule Out COVID-19
Winichakoon, P., Chaiwarith, R., Liwsrisakun, C., Salee, P., Goonna, A., Limsukon, A., & Kaewpoowat, Q. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00297-20 · Cited by 327
Diagnostic Stewardship: Opportunity for a Laboratory–Infectious Diseases Partnership
Patel, R., & Fang, F. C. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy077 · Cited by 127
Self-citationMurray, M. A., Schulz, L. A., Furst, J. W., Homme, J. H., Jenkins, S. M., Uhl, J. R., Patel, R., Cockerill, F. C., Myers, J. F., & Pritt, B. S. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02500-14 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Cited by
Immune response, inflammation, and the clinical spectrum of COVID-19
García, L. F. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01441 · Cited by 739
Porte, L., Legarraga, P., Vollrath, V., Aguilera, X., Munita, J. M., Araos, R., Pizarro, G., Vial, P., Iruretagoyena, M., Dittrich, S., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Patel, R., Babady, E., Theel, E. S., Storch, G. A., Pinsky, B. A., St. George, K., Smith, T. C., & Bertuzzi, S.
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- OpenAlex
- W3013013352
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS–CoV-2/COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.00722-20
- The paper
- Patel, R., Babady, E., Theel, E. S., Storch, G. A., Pinsky, B. A., St. George, K., Smith, T. C., & Bertuzzi, S. (2020). Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS–CoV-2/COVID-19. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00722-20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.