Cited by 132

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Haploid Genetic Screen Reveals a Profound and Direct Dependence on Cholesterol for Hantavirus Membrane Fusion

Kleinfelter, Lara M., Jangra, Rohit K., Jae, Lucas T., Herbert, Andrew S., Mittler, Eva, Stiles, Katie M., Wirchnianski, Ariel S., Kielian, Margaret, Brummelkamp, Thijn R., Dye, John M., Chandran, Kartik·2015·mBio

Abstract

Hantaviruses cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in the Old World and a highly fatal hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS) in the New World. No vaccines or antiviral therapies are currently available to prevent or treat hantavirus disease, and gaps in our understanding of how hantaviruses enter cells challenge the search for therapeutics. We performed a haploid genetic screen in human cells to identify host factors required for entry by Andes virus, a highly virulent New World hantavirus. We found that multiple genes involved in cholesterol sensing, regulation, and biosynthesis, including key components of the sterol response element-binding protein (SREBP) pathway, are critical for Andes virus entry. Genetic or pharmacological disruption of the membrane-bound transcription factor peptidase/site-1 protease (MBTPS1/S1P), an SREBP control element, dramatically reduced infection by virulent hantaviruses of both the Old World and New World clades but not by rhabdoviruses or alphaviruses, indicating that this pathway is broadly, but selectively, required by hantaviruses. These results could be fully explained as arising from the modest depletion of cellular membrane cholesterol that accompanied S1P disruption. Mechanistic studies of cells and with protein-free liposomes suggested that high levels of cholesterol are specifically needed for hantavirus membrane fusion. Taken together, our results indicate that the profound dependence on target membrane cholesterol is a fundamental, and unusual, biophysical property of hantavirus glycoprotein-membrane interactions during entry. IMPORTANCE Although hantaviruses cause important human diseases worldwide, no specific antiviral treatments are available. One of the major obstacles to the development of new therapies is a lack of understanding of how hantaviruses hijack our own host factors to enter cells. Here, we identified multiple cellular genes that control the levels of cholesterol in cellular membranes to be important for hantavirus entry. Our findings suggest that high concentrations of cholesterol in cellular membranes are required at a specific step in the entry process—fusion between viral and cellular membranes—that allows escape of the hantavirus genome into the host cell cytoplasm to initiate infection. Our findings uncover a fundamental feature of the hantavirus infection mechanism and point to cholesterol-lowering drugs as a potential new treatment of hantaviral infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.00801-15

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.531 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3201/eid0302.970202 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrmicro3066 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1364-7_10 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.09.017 · DOI
  6. 10.3201/eid2003.131581 · DOI
  7. Elliott RM, Schmaljohn CS. 2014. Bunyaviridae, p 1244–1282. In Fields virology, 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
  8. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90310-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0168-1702(94)90074-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/viro.2001.1171 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90060-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.virol.2004.11.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90709-X · DOI
  14. 10.3390/v6041801 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7074 · DOI
  16. 10.1128/JVI.73.5.3951-3959.1999 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-3-642-56753-7_6 · DOI
  18. 10.1128/JVI.02210-07 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.08.035 · DOI
  20. 10.1084/jem.20131092 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003911 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature10348 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.1178955 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.1233675 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1126/science.1252480 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5785 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81304-5 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1074/jbc.271.17.10379 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1124/jpet.108.139626 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.06.031 · DOI
  34. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00090.x · DOI
  35. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002232 · DOI
  36. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03338.x · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28549 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80150-1 · DOI
  39. 10.1006/viro.2001.1303 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.12.030 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.007 · DOI
  42. 10.1128/JVI.73.5.4272-4278.1999 · DOI
  43. 10.3390/v2040796 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nsmb.1455 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085521 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/emboj.2012.53 · DOI
  47. 10.1083/jcb.112.4.615 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nbt.1857 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.001 · DOI
  50. 10.1128/JVI.01647-07 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.221447598 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/JVI.77.5.2866-2872.2003 · DOI
  53. 10.1074/jbc.M603215200 · DOI
  54. 10.1128/JVI.78.1.33-41.2004 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.010 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/nrm2330 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1074/jbc.M202838200 · DOI
  58. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00072.x · DOI
  59. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000851 · DOI
  60. 10.1099/vir.0.81083-0 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82444-9 · DOI
  62. 10.1074/jbc.M413927200 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/infdis/137.3.298 · DOI
  64. 10.1006/viro.1995.1019 · DOI
  65. 10.1006/viro.2001.1133 · DOI
  66. 10.1006/viro.1998.9275 · DOI
  67. 10.1128/JVI.01832-09 · DOI
  68. 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8388 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/nmeth.2413 · DOI
  70. 10.1126/science.1110656 · DOI
  71. 10.1021/bi00042a009 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 · DOI
  73. 10.1128/JVI.74.4.1623-1631.2000 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kleinfelter, L. M., Jangra, R. K., Jae, L. T., Herbert, A. S., Mittler, E., Stiles, K. M., Wirchnianski, A. S., Kielian, M., Brummelkamp, T. R., Dye, J. M., & Chandran, K.
Venue
mBio
Published
2015-09
Volume
6
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2161-2129
  • 2150-7511
Cited by
132
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review