CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 556Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchNosocomial Infections in ICU

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial Topography of the Healthy Human Lower Respiratory Tract

Open access
Dickson, Robert P., Erb-Downward, John R., Freeman, Christine M., McCloskey, Lisa, Falkowski, Nicole R., Huffnagle, Gary B., Curtis, Jeffrey L.·2017·mBio
DOI 10.1128/mbio.02287-16PMC PMC5312084
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although culture-independent techniques have refuted lung sterility in health, controversy about contamination during bronchoscope passage through the upper respiratory tract (URT) has impeded research progress. We sought to establish whether bronchoscopic sampling accurately reflects the lung microbiome in health and to distinguish between two proposed routes of authentic microbial immigration, (i) dispersion along contiguous respiratory mucosa and (ii) subclinical microaspiration. During bronchoscopy of eight adult volunteers without lung disease, we performed seven protected specimen brushings (PSB) and bilateral bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) per subject. We amplified, sequenced, and analyzed the bacterial 16S rRNA gene V4 regions by using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Rigorous attention was paid to eliminate potential sources of error or contamination, including a randomized processing order and the inclusion and analysis of exhaustive procedural and sequencing control specimens. Indices of mouth-lung immigration (mouth-lung community similarity, bacterial burden, and community richness) were all significantly greater in airway and alveolar specimens than in bronchoscope contamination control specimens, indicating minimal evidence of pharyngeal contamination. Ecological indices of mouth-lung immigration peaked at or near the carina, as predicted for a primary immigration route of microaspiration. Bacterial burden, diversity, and mouth-lung similarity were greater in BAL than PSB samples, reflecting differences in the sampled surface areas. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02392182.) IMPORTANCE This study defines the bacterial topography of the healthy human respiratory tract and provides ecological evidence that bacteria enter the lungs in health primarily by microaspiration, with potential contribution in some subjects by direct dispersal along contiguous mucosa. By demonstrating that contamination contributes negligibly to microbial communities in bronchoscopically acquired specimens, we validate the use of bronchoscopy to investigate the lung microbiome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.02287-16

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIG 1 Experimental design and conceptual models. Eight subjects without respiratory disease underwent serial sampling of the LRT by bronchoscopy. (A) Sampling methods and locations. Numbers refer to the sampling order. (B) Schematic diagram of method: avoiding contact with airway mucosa for BCC (left), brushing a discrete area of airway mucosa with PSBs (middle), and sampling airways distal to the wedged bronchoscope by BAL (right). (C) Predicted bacterial topographic patterns for three possible routes of microbial immigration: bronchoscope contamination (indices of mouth-lung immigration peak with the BCC and decrease with serial sampling), dispersion along the bronchial mucosa (indices are low in BCC and high in proximal samples and decrease with distance from the pharyngeal source community), and microaspiration (indices are also low in BCC, peak at the main carina, and decrease with subsequent bronchial distance in upright subjects).
FIG 1 Experimental design and conceptual models. Eight subjects without respiratory disease underwent serial sampling of the LRT by bronchoscopy. (A) Sampling methods and locations. Numbers refer to the sampling order. (B) Schematic diagram of method: avoiding contact with airway mucosa for BCC (left), brushing a discrete area of airway mucosa with PSBs (middle), and sampling airways distal to the wedged bronchoscope by BAL (right). (C) Predicted bacterial topographic patterns for three possible routes of microbial immigration: bronchoscope contamination (indices of mouth-lung immigration peak with the BCC and decrease with serial sampling), dispersion along the bronchial mucosa (indices are low in BCC and high in proximal samples and decrease with distance from the pharyngeal source community), and microaspiration (indices are also low in BCC, peak at the main carina, and decrease with subsequent bronchial distance in upright subjects).CC BY · PubMed Central
FIG 2 Bacterial taxa detected in airway, alveolar, and procedural control specimens. Taxa are listed in decreasing order of mean relative abundance in oral specimens. Red squares represent higher relative abundance (see color key at bottom right). On the right are plots of the kernel density estimates (bandwidth = 0.1) of Bray-Curtis similarity measurements comparing oral-to-specimen similarity (0, entirely different; 1, identical). The oral rinse plot reflects intragroup Bray-Curtis similarity. Plot heights are scaled to the relative density maximum.
FIG 2 Bacterial taxa detected in airway, alveolar, and procedural control specimens. Taxa are listed in decreasing order of mean relative abundance in oral specimens. Red squares represent higher relative abundance (see color key at bottom right). On the right are plots of the kernel density estimates (bandwidth = 0.1) of Bray-Curtis similarity measurements comparing oral-to-specimen similarity (0, entirely different; 1, identical). The oral rinse plot reflects intragroup Bray-Curtis similarity. Plot heights are scaled to the relative density maximum.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIG 3 Bacterial topography of the healthy human LRT. Mouth-lung bacterial immigration along the LRT was quantified by mouth-lung community similarity (Bray-Curtis similarity) (A), bacterial DNA (log10 number of 16S copies per reaction determined by real-time qPCR) (B), and community richness (number of OTUs per 2,000 sequences) (C). Symbols are as in Fig. 1; Prox, proximal; BI, bronchus intermedius. By all indices, BCCs (triangle) exhibited less evidence of mouth-lung immigration than airway wall PSB specimens (squares) (P ≤ 0.001, paired Student t test) or BAL specimens (circles) (P ≤ 0.01, paired Student t test). Indices of mouth-lung immigration in airway PSB samples are nonlinear, consistent with the topographic pattern predicted in Fig. 1 for microaspiration in upright subjects. Data are mean values ± SEM (n = 8).
FIG 3 Bacterial topography of the healthy human LRT. Mouth-lung bacterial immigration along the LRT was quantified by mouth-lung community similarity (Bray-Curtis similarity) (A), bacterial DNA (log10 number of 16S copies per reaction determined by real-time qPCR) (B), and community richness (number of OTUs per 2,000 sequences) (C). Symbols are as in Fig. 1; Prox, proximal; BI, bronchus intermedius. By all indices, BCCs (triangle) exhibited less evidence of mouth-lung immigration than airway wall PSB specimens (squares) (P ≤ 0.001, paired Student t test) or BAL specimens (circles) (P ≤ 0.01, paired Student t test). Indices of mouth-lung immigration in airway PSB samples are nonlinear, consistent with the topographic pattern predicted in Fig. 1 for microaspiration in upright subjects. Data are mean values ± SEM (n = 8).CC BY · PubMed Central
FIG 4 Bacterial community membership along the healthy human LRT. The relative abundances of the two most abundant bacterial community members in oral rinse specimens, Prevotella sp. (OTU002) (A) and Veillonella sp. (OTU004) (B), among LRT communities at various locations are graphed. Symbols are as in Fig. 1. Note that the leftmost sample is oral rinse rather than BCC as in Fig. 1C and 2. The relative abundances of both OTUs in LRT PSB samples are nonlinear, peaking at the carina and proximal (Prox.) bronchus intermedius (BI), consistent with the predicted pattern of microaspiration in upright subjects. Data are mean values ± SEM (n = 8).
FIG 4 Bacterial community membership along the healthy human LRT. The relative abundances of the two most abundant bacterial community members in oral rinse specimens, Prevotella sp. (OTU002) (A) and Veillonella sp. (OTU004) (B), among LRT communities at various locations are graphed. Symbols are as in Fig. 1. Note that the leftmost sample is oral rinse rather than BCC as in Fig. 1C and 2. The relative abundances of both OTUs in LRT PSB samples are nonlinear, peaking at the carina and proximal (Prox.) bronchus intermedius (BI), consistent with the predicted pattern of microaspiration in upright subjects. Data are mean values ± SEM (n = 8).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 556

Related

Metadata

Authors
Dickson, R. P., Erb-Downward, J. R., Freeman, C. M., McCloskey, L., Falkowski, N. R., Huffnagle, G. B., & Curtis, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Curtis, Jeffrey L.
ORCID
Venue
mBio
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Published
2017-03-08
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-2129
DOI
10.1128/mbio.02287-16
PMC
PMC5312084
OpenAlex
W2588100341
Cited by
548
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 18
FWCI
17.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR000433, K23 HL130641, U01 HL098961, R01 HL114447)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX001389, I01 CX000911)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
lung microbiome, lower respiratory tract, bronchoscopic sampling, bronchoalveolar lavage, microaspiration, 16S rRNA gene sequencing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bacteria, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Bronchoscopy, DNA, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Metagenome, Microbiota, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review