Cited by 18Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsProtist diversity and phylogeny

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the possibility of yet a third kinetochore system in the protist phylum Euglenozoa

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Transmission of genetic material from one generation to the next is a fundamental feature of all living cells. In eukaryotes, a macromolecular complex called the kinetochore plays crucial roles during chromosome segregation by linking chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Little is known about this process in evolutionarily diverse protists. Within the supergroup Discoba, Euglenozoa forms a speciose group of unicellular flagellates—kinetoplastids, euglenids, and diplonemids. Kinetoplastids have an unconventional kinetochore system, while euglenids have subunits that are conserved among most eukaryotes. For diplonemids, a group of extremely diverse and abundant marine flagellates, it remains unclear what kind of kinetochores are present. Here, we employed deep homology detection protocols using profile-versus-profile Hidden Markov Model searches and AlphaFold-based structural comparisons to detect homologies that might have been previously missed. Interestingly, we still could not detect orthologs for most of the kinetoplastid or canonical kinetochore subunits with few exceptions including a putative centromere-specific histone H3 variant (cenH3/CENP-A), the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2, the chromosomal passenger complex members Aurora and INCENP, and broadly conserved proteins like CLK kinase and the meiotic synaptonemal complex proteins SYCP2/3 that also function at kinetoplastid kinetochores. We examined the localization of five candidate kinetochore-associated proteins in the model diplonemid, Paradiplonema papillatum. Pp CENP-A shows discrete dots in the nucleus, implying that it is likely a kinetochore component. Pp Mad2, Pp CLK KKT10/19 , Pp SYCP2L1 KKT17/18 , and Pp INCENP reside in the nucleus, but no clear kinetochore localization was observed. Altogether, these results point to the possibility that diplonemids evolved a hitherto unknown type of kinetochore system. IMPORTANCE: A macromolecular assembly called the kinetochore is essential for the segregation of genetic material during eukaryotic cell division. Therefore, characterization of kinetochores across species is essential for understanding the mechanisms involved in this key process across the eukaryotic tree of life. In particular, little is known about kinetochores in divergent protists such as Euglenozoa, a group of unicellular flagellates that includes kinetoplastids, euglenids, and diplonemids, the latter being a highly diverse and abundant component of marine plankton. While kinetoplastids have an unconventional kinetochore system and euglenids have a canonical one similar to traditional model eukaryotes, preliminary searches detected neither unconventional nor canonical kinetochore components in diplonemids. Here, we employed state-of-the-art deep homology detection protocols but still could not detect orthologs for the bulk of kinetoplastid-specific nor canonical kinetochore proteins in diplonemids except for a putative centromere-specific histone H3 variant. Our results suggest that diplonemids evolved kinetochores that do not resemble previously known ones.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.02936-24

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. 10.1007/s12064-013-0184-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1515/bmc-2020-0001 · DOI
  3. 10.1101/cshperspect.a023218 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41580-023-00593-z · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.031 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-3-319-58592-5_5 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1821945116 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/biology6010005 · DOI
  9. 10.1146/annurev-genet-072820-034559 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r23 · DOI
  11. 10.15252/embr.201744102 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.021 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.12.007 · DOI
  14. 10.7554/eLife.03676 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.024 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.014 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41467-021-26077-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1242/jcs.245753 · DOI
  19. 10.1083/jcb.202111084 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.1112642 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rsob.130023 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.049 · DOI
  23. 10.1098/rsob.150206 · DOI
  24. 10.1083/jcb.201608043 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rsob.190236 · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.641174 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/nar/gkp851 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.055 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/s12915-020-0754-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41598-021-82369-z · DOI
  31. 10.1098/rsob.210049 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ejop.2016.09.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1098/rsob.200407 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107088 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.1261605 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.031 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.protis.2022.125868 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/1462-2920.15190 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/mbio.01921-23 · DOI
  40. 10.1101/2024.01.07.573240 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/1462-2920.14041 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/s41592-020-0796-x · DOI
  43. 10.1111/1462-2920.15130 · DOI
  44. 10.1098/rsob.220364 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkad422 · DOI
  46. 10.1186/s12915-023-01563-9 · DOI
  47. 10.1186/s12915-021-01186-y · DOI
  48. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8736-8_13 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt661 · DOI
  50. 10.1091/mbc.E13-12-0750 · DOI
  51. 10.1098/rsob.240025 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1101/2020.01.27.920793 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.1420657112 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112668 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/gbe/evad017 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/ncb2347 · DOI
  58. 10.1042/BST20130200 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nsb996 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00435-x · DOI
  61. 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01257-2 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/nrm3474 · DOI
  63. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002354 · DOI
  64. 10.7554/eLife.93522 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00673-4 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.031 · DOI
  67. 10.1073/pnas.2200108119 · DOI
  68. 10.1146/annurev-genet-061323-044915 · DOI
  69. 10.1242/jcs.240978 · DOI
  70. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.97 · DOI
  71. 10.3390/ijms22116047 · DOI
  72. 10.15252/embr.201744216 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/s42003-022-04280-1 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1973.tb00895.x · DOI
  75. 10.1016/S0932-4739(11)80003-9 · DOI
  76. 10.1242/jcs.01515 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/s41586-018-0281-1 · DOI
  78. 10.1080/19491034.2024.2310452 · DOI
  79. 10.1186/s12915-019-0626-8 · DOI
  80. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.658721 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.pt.2023.08.004 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/nar/gkz1215 · DOI
  83. 10.1038/s41598-017-14286-z · DOI
  84. 10.1093/gbe/evac099 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003 · DOI
  87. 10.1371/journal.pone.0259871 · DOI
  88. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.24072/pcjournal.173 · DOI
  90. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1038/s42003-023-05501-x · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1021/pr700658q · DOI
  99. 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_7 · DOI
  101. 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Benz, C., Raas, M. W. D., Tripathi, P., Faktorová, D., Tromer, E. C., Akiyoshi, B., & Lukeš, J.
Affiliations
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Tromer, Eelco C.
  • Akiyoshi, Bungo
  • Lukeš, Julius
Venue
mBio
Published
2024-12-11
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
e0293624-e0293624
ISSN
2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403888985
Cited by
18
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (227243/Z/23/Z, 203149)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Veni.202.223, 202.223, VI.Veni.202.223)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky (23-06479X)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
kinetochore, Euglenozoa, diplonemids, kinetoplastids, Euglenophyta, chromosome segregation, centromere, Mad2, chromosomal passenger complex, SYCP2, INCENP
MeSH terms
Phylogeny, Protozoan Proteins, Kinetochores, Chromosome Segregation, Euglenozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review