Cited by 13Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsTrypanosoma species research and implicationsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kinetoplastid kinetochore proteins KKT14–KKT15 are divergent Bub1/BubR1–Bub3 proteins

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Faithful transmission of genetic material is crucial for the survival of all organisms. In many eukaryotes, a feedback control mechanism called the spindle checkpoint ensures chromosome segregation fidelity by delaying cell cycle progression until all chromosomes achieve proper attachment to the mitotic spindle. Kinetochores are the macromolecular complexes that act as the interface between chromosomes and spindle microtubules. While most eukaryotes have canonical kinetochore proteins that are widely conserved, kinetoplastids such as Trypanosoma brucei have a seemingly unique set of kinetochore proteins including KKT1–25. It remains poorly understood how kinetoplastids regulate cell cycle progression or ensure chromosome segregation fidelity. Here, we report a crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of KKT14 from Apiculatamorpha spiralis and uncover that it is a pseudokinase. Its structure is most similar to the kinase domain of a spindle checkpoint protein Bub1. In addition, KKT14 has a putative ABBA motif that is present in Bub1 and its paralogue BubR1. We also find that the N-terminal part of KKT14 interacts with KKT15, whose WD40 repeat beta-propeller is phylogenetically closely related to a direct interactor of Bub1/BubR1 called Bub3. Our findings indicate that KKT14–KKT15 are divergent orthologues of Bub1/BubR1–Bub3, which promote accurate chromosome segregation in trypanosomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsob.240025

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. 10.1146/annurev-genet-072820-034559 · DOI
  2. 10.3390/biology6010005 · DOI
  3. 10.1098/rsob.170204 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nrm3132 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ncb2348 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.06.009 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nrm3888 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41580-023-00593-z · DOI
  9. 10.1083/jcb.200102093 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.052 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.01030 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.051 · DOI
  14. 10.1083/jcb.142.1.1 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/ncb2515 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.009 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1180189 · DOI
  18. 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1239 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.003 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M114.616490 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0610358104 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rsob.160315 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ncb1570 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0505053102 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.034 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.021 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2016.07.003 · DOI
  30. 10.1242/jcs.115.5.1017 · DOI
  31. 10.1242/jcs.112.24.4641 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.013 · DOI
  33. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nrmicro2149 · DOI
  35. 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115617 · DOI
  36. 10.1590/0074-02760150253 · DOI
  37. 10.15252/embr.201744102 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.1821945116 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.049 · DOI
  40. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.641174 · DOI
  41. 10.1083/jcb.201608043 · DOI
  42. 10.1098/rsob.150206 · DOI
  43. 10.1098/rsob.190236 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00298 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41564-020-0745-6 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s10930-018-9785-7 · DOI
  47. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0628 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.017 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1002/pro.4519 · DOI
  51. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052410-090317 · DOI
  52. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144673 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s41422-019-0178-z · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.str.2014.08.020 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.006 · DOI
  56. 10.1098/rsob.120136 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.031 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/scisignal.aav3810 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1038/s41564-022-01295-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.094 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.04.004 · DOI
  63. 10.1242/jcs.95.1.49 · DOI
  64. 10.1083/jcb.202101022 · DOI
  65. 10.1126/science.1112642 · DOI
  66. 10.1074/jbc.M504326200 · DOI
  67. Akiyoshi B . 2020 Analysis of a Mad2 homolog in Trypanosoma brucei provides possible hints on the origin of the spindle checkpoint. bioRxiv. (doi:10.1101/2020.12.29.424754) · DOI
  68. 10.1098/rsob.130023 · DOI
  69. 10.1242/bio.031609 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/S0166-6851(97)00197-7 · DOI
  71. 10.1101/gad.302067.117 · DOI
  72. 10.1126/science.abc1424 · DOI
  73. 10.1126/science.abc1152 · DOI
  74. 10.1242/jcs.169821 · DOI
  75. 10.1098/rsob.110037 · DOI
  76. Brun R , Schönenberger M . 1979 Cultivation and in vitro cloning or procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Acta Trop. 36 , 289–292.
  77. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.03.012 · DOI
  78. 10.1098/rsob.140197 · DOI
  79. 10.1242/jcs.240978 · DOI
  80. 10.1083/jcb.200607174 · DOI
  81. 10.1007/978-1-61779-477-3_8 · DOI
  82. 10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x · DOI
  83. 10.1093/nar/gkac1040 · DOI
  84. 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1038/nprot.2017.147 · DOI
  86. Blighe K . 2023 Enhancedvolcano: publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced colouring and labeling. See https://github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano. · DOI
  87. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_18 · DOI
  88. 10.1107/S0907444906022116 · DOI
  89. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1093/nar/gkp851 · DOI
  92. 10.1186/s12915-020-0754-1 · DOI
  93. 10.1038/s41598-021-82369-z · DOI
  94. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
  97. 10.1093/nar/gkac240 · DOI
  98. Evans R et al . 2022 Protein complex prediction with alphafold-multimer. bioRxiv. (doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034) · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  101. 10.1002/cpbi.108 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1038/s42003-023-05501-x · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1093/nar/gky1085 · DOI
  104. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  105. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · DOI
  106. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1093/nar/gkab301 · DOI
  110. Ballmer D Carter W van Hooff JJE Tromer EC Ishii M Ludzia P Akiyoshi B . 2024 Supplementary material from: Kinetoplastid kinetochore proteins KKT14–KKT15 are divergent Bub1/BubR1–Bub3 proteins. Figshare (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7214471) · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Ballmer, D., Carter, W., van Hooff, J. J. E., Tromer, E. C., Ishii, M., Ludzia, P., & Akiyoshi, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Akiyoshi, Bungo
Venue
Open Biology
Published
2024-06
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
240025-240025
ISSN
2046-2441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399518174
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Open Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
kinetochore proteins, BUB1, BubR1, Bub3, spindle assembly checkpoint, chromosome segregation, kinetoplastids, Trypanosoma brucei, pseudokinase, crystal structure, protein evolution, cell cycle regulation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Molecular, Phylogeny, Protein Binding, Trypanosoma brucei brucei, Protozoan Proteins, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Crystallography, X-Ray, Kinetochores, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromosome Segregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review