The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rad51 Paralog Complexes BCDX2 and CX3 Act at Different Stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-Dependent Homologous Recombination Pathway
Open accessAbstract
The Rad51 paralogs are required for homologous recombination (HR) and the maintenance of genomic stability. The molecular mechanisms by which the five vertebrate Rad51 paralogs regulate HR and genomic integrity remain unclear. The Rad51 paralogs associate with one another in two distinct complexes: Rad51B-Rad51C-Rad51D-XRCC2 (BCDX2) and Rad51C-XRCC3 (CX3). We find that the BCDX2 and CX3 complexes act at different stages of the HR pathway. In response to DNA damage, the BCDX2 complex acts downstream of BRCA2 recruitment but upstream of Rad51 recruitment. In contrast, the CX3 complex acts downstream of Rad51 recruitment but still has a marked impact on the measured frequency of homologous recombination. Both complexes are epistatic with BRCA2 and synthetically lethal with Rad52. We conclude that human Rad51 paralogs facilitate BRCA2-Rad51-dependent homologous recombination at different stages in the pathway and function independently of Rad52.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given that these three genes all belong to the RAD51 paralog complex BCDX223, the BRCA2-type HRD suggests that RAD51B and XRCC2 deficiency could have led to HRD in these patients.”
From Pan-cancer landscape of homologous recombination deficiency. (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection
Roy, R., Chun, J., & Powell, S. N. (2011) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3181 · Cited by 1,555
Self-citationXRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cellsPreprint
Pierce, A. J., Johnson, R. D., Thompson, L. H., & Jasin, M. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.20.2633 · Cited by 1,384
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · Cited by 1,066
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Tachiiri, S., Fukushima, T., Sonoda, E., Schild, D., Thompson, L. H., & Takeda, S. (2001) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.21.8.2858-2866.2001 · Cited by 523
Rad51 Recombinase and Recombination Mediators
Sung, P., Krejčí, L., Komen, S. V., & Sehorn, M. G. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r300027200 · Cited by 446
Recombinational DNA repair and human disease
Thompson, L. H., & Schild, D. (2002) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00224-5 · Cited by 417
Identification and purification of two distinct complexes containing the five RAD51 paralogsPreprint
Masson, J., Tarsounas, M., Stasiak, A. Z., Stasiak, A., Punatar, R. S., McIlwraith, M. J., Benson, F. E., & West, S. C. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947001 · Cited by 395
Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency
Feng, Z., Scott, S. P., Bussen, W., Sharma, G. G., Guo, G., Pandita, T. K., & Powell, S. N. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010959107 · Cited by 346
Self-citationChk2 Phosphorylation of BRCA1 Regulates DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Zhang, J., Willers, H., Feng, Z., Ghosh, J. C., Kim, S., Weaver, D. T., Chung, J. H., Powell, S. N., & Xia, F. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.2.708-718.2004 · Cited by 323
Self-citationHu, Y., Raynard, S. J., Sehorn, M. G., Lu, X., Bussen, W., Zheng, L., Stark, J. M., Barnes, E. L., Chi, P., Janščák, P., et al. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1609107 · Cited by 322
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- An J, 2010, Int. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Genet., 1, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Homologous Recombination and Human Health: The Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Proteins
Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., & Jasin, M. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016600 · Cited by 869
RAD51B in Familial Breast Cancer
Pelttari, L. M., Khan, S., Vuorela, M., Kiiski, J. I., Vilske, S., Nevanlinna, V., Ranta, S., Schleutker, J., Winqvist, R., Kallioniemi, A. H., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153788 · Cited by 672
Pan-cancer landscape of homologous recombination deficiency.
Nguyen, L., W. M. Martens, J., Van Hoeck, A., & Cuppen, E. (2020) · Nature communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19406-4 · Cited by 532
“Given that these 3 genes all belong to the RAD51 paralog complex BCDX2[24], the BRCA2-type HRD suggests that RAD51B and XRCC2 deficiency could have led to HRD in these patients.”
BackgroundLemacon, D. S., Jackson, J., Quinet, A., Brickner, J. R., Li, S., Yazinski, S. A., You, Z., Ira, G., Zou, L., Mosammaparast, N., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01180-5 · Cited by 429
Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways
Yeh, C. D., Richardson, C. D., & Corn, J. E. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0425-z · Cited by 425
Mladenov, E., Magin, S., Soni, A., & Iliakis, G. E. (2016) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.03.003 · Cited by 271
CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the Fanconi anemia pathway
Richardson, C. D., Kazane, K. R., Feng, S. J., Zelin, E., Bray, N. L., Schäfer, A. J., Floor, S. N., & Corn, J. E. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0174-0 · Cited by 259
Structural basis of homologous recombination
Sun, Y., McCorvie, T. J., Yates, L. A., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03365-1 · Cited by 175
Kolinjivadi, A. M., Sannino, V., Antoni, A. D., Técher, H., Baldi, G., & Costanzo, V. (2017) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12556 · Cited by 155
Rad51 Paralogs Remodel Pre-synaptic Rad51 Filaments to Stimulate Homologous Recombination
Taylor, M. R. G., Špı́rek, M., Chaurasiya, K. R., Ward, J. D., Carzaniga, R., Yu, X., Egelman, E. H., Collinson, L., Rueda, D., Krejčí, L., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.015 · Cited by 156
RAD-ical New Insights into RAD51 Regulation
Sullivan, M. R., & Bernstein, K. A. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9120629 · Cited by 152
Wei, L., Nakajima, S., Böhm, S., Bernstein, K. A., Shen, Z., Tsang, M., Levine, A. S., & Lan, L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507105112 · Cited by 147
Cramer-Morales, K. L., Nieborowska-Skorska, M., Scheibner, K. A., Padget, M. R., Irvine, D. A., Śliwiński, T., Haas, K., Lee, J. W., Geng, H., Roy, D. B., et al. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2013-05-501072 · Cited by 148
Park, J.-Y., Singh, T. R., Nassar, N., Zhang, F., Freund, M., Hanenberg, H., Meetei, A. R., & Andreassen, P. R. (2014) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2013.421 · Cited by 130
Mammalian RAD51 paralogs protect nascent DNA at stalled forks and mediate replication restart
Somyajit, K., Saxena, S., Babu, S., Mishra, A., & Nagaraju, G. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv880 · Cited by 132
Genetic Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancers: How Many and Which Genes to Test?
Angeli, D., Salvi, S., & Tedaldi, G. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21031128 · Cited by 132
Godin, S. K., Sullivan, M. R., & Bernstein, K. A. (2016) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2016-0012 · Cited by 128
PARP Trapping Beyond Homologous Recombination and Platinum Sensitivity in Cancers
Murai, J., & Pommier, Y. G. (2018) · Annual Review of Cancer Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030518-055914 · Cited by 114
Sequential role of RAD51 paralog complexes in replication fork remodeling and restart
Berti, M., Teloni, F., Mijic, S., Ursich, S., Fuchs, J., Palumbieri, M. D., Krietsch, J., Schmid, J. A., Garcin, E. B., Gon, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17324-z · Cited by 104
Lok, B. H., & Powell, S. N. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-3150 · Cited by 110
Self-citationPellegrino, B., Herencia-Ropero, A., Llop‐Guevara, A., Pedretti, F., Moles‐Fernández, A., Viaplana, C., Villacampa, G. J., Guzmán, M., Rodríguez, O., Grueso, J., et al. (2022) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-2409 · Cited by 102
Targeting BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells with RAD52 small molecule inhibitors
Huang, F., Goyal, N., Sullivan, K., Hanamshet, K., Patel, M., Mazina, O. M., Wang, C. X., An, W. F., Spoonamore, J. E., Metkar, S. R., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw087 · Cited by 103
DNA Repair Pathways in Trypanosomatids: from DNA Repair to Drug Resistance
Genois, M., Paquet, É. R., Laffitte, M.-C. N., Maity, R., Rodrigue, A., Ouellette, M., & Masson, J. (2014) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00045-13 · Cited by 101
Systematic Screen Identifies miRNAs That Target RAD51 and RAD51D to Enhance Chemosensitivity
Huang, J., Wang, Y., Dhillon, K. K., Calses, P. C., Villegas, E., Mitchell, P. S., Tewari, M., Kemp, C. J., & Taniguchi, T. (2013) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-13-0292 · Cited by 95
Chandramouly, G., McDevitt, S., Sullivan, K., Kent, T., Luz, A. N., Glickman, J. F., Andrake, M., Skórski, T., & Pomerantz, R. T. (2015) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.10.003 · Cited by 91
Reappearance from Obscurity: Mammalian Rad52 in Homologous Recombination
Hanamshet, K., Mazina, O. M., & Mazin, A. V. (2016) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes7090063 · Cited by 89
Park, J.-Y., Virts, E. L., Jankowska, A. M., Wiek, C., Othman, M. A., Chakraborty, S., Vance, G. H., Alkuraya, F. S., Hanenberg, H., & Andreassen, P. R. (2016) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103847 · Cited by 83
Beláň, O., Barroso, C., Kaczmarczyk, A. P., Anand, R., Federico, S., O’Reilly, N., Newton, M. D., Mäeots, M.-E., Enchev, R. I., Martínez-Pérez, E., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.020 · Cited by 75
PALB2: The hub of a network of tumor suppressors involved in DNA damage responses
Park, J., Zhang, F., & Andreassen, P. R. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.06.003 · Cited by 83
Differential Requirements for the RAD51 Paralogs in Genome Repair and Maintenance in Human Cells
Garcin, E. B., Gon, S., Prakash, R., Sullivan, M. R., Brunette, G. J., Cian, A. D., Concordet, J.-P., Giovannangeli, C., Dirks, W. G., Eberth, S., et al. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008355 · Cited by 82
A fork in the road: Where homologous recombination and stalled replication fork protection part ways
Tye, S., Ronson, G. E., & Morris, J. R. (2020) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.07.004 · Cited by 80
XRCC2 mutation causes meiotic arrest, azoospermia and infertility
Yang, Y., Guo, J., Dai, L., Zhu, Y., Hu, H., Tan, L., Chen, W., Liang, D., He, J., Tu, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105145 · Cited by 76
Hengel, S. R., Malacaria, E., Constantino, L. F. D. S., Bain, F. E., Diaz, A., Koch, B. G., Yu, L. P., Wu, M., Pichierri, P., Spies, M., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.14740 · Cited by 78
MATSUZAKI, K., Kondo, S., Ishikawa, T., & Shinohara, A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09190-1 · Cited by 74
Synthetic lethal strategies for the development of cancer therapeutics
Ngoi, N. Y. L., Gallo, D., Torrado, C., Nardo, M., Durocher, D., & Yap, T. A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00966-z · Cited by 81
AlHilli, M. M., Becker, M. A., Weroha, S. J., Flatten, K. S., Hurley, R. M., Harrell, M. I., Oberg, A. L., Maurer, M. J., Hawthorne, K. M., Hou, X., et al. (2016) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.328 · Cited by 73
Cell Biology of Mitotic RecombinationPreprint
Lisby, M., & Rothstein, R. J. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016535 · Cited by 70
DNA Recombination Strategies During Antigenic Variation in the African Trypanosome
McCulloch, R., Morrison, L. J., & Hall, J. P. J. (2015) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna3-0016-2014 · Cited by 65
Regulation of RAD51 at the Transcriptional and Functional Levels: What Prospects for Cancer Therapy?
Orhan, E., Velázquez, C., Tabet, I., Sardet, C., & Theillet, C. G. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13122930 · Cited by 68
Somyajit, K., Basavaraju, S., Scully, R., & Nagaraju, G. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01521-12 · Cited by 70
Distinct binding of BRCA2 BRC repeats to RAD51 generates differential DNA damage sensitivity
Chatterjee, G., Jiménez-Sáinz, J., Presti, T., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Jensen, R. B. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw242 · Cited by 65
Roles of XRCC2, RAD51B and RAD51D in RAD51-Independent SSA Recombination
Serra, H., Ines, O. D., Degroote, F., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003971 · Cited by 63
The concerted roles of FANCM and Rad52 in the protection of common fragile sites
Wang, H., Li, S., Oaks, J. J., Ren, J., Li, L., & Wu, X. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05066-y · Cited by 64
PRMT2 and RORγ Expression Are Associated With Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes
Oh, T. G., Bailey, P. J., Dray, E. V., Smith, A. G., Goode, J. M., Eriksson, N. A., Funder, J. W., Fuller, P. J., Simpson, E. R., Tilley, W. D., et al. (2014) · Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/me.2013-1403 · Cited by 61
Human RAD52 interactions with replication protein A and the RAD51 presynaptic complex
Ma, C. J., Kwon, Y., Sung, P., & Greene, E. C. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.794545 · Cited by 62
RAD52: Paradigm of Synthetic Lethality and New Developments
Rossi, M. J., DiDomenico, S. F., Patel, M., & Mazin, A. V. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.780293 · Cited by 57
Non-catalytic Roles for XPG with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Homologous Recombination and Genome Stability
Trego, K. S., Groesser, T., Davalos, A. R., Parplys, A. C., Zhao, W., Nelson, M. R., Hlaing, A. S., Shih, B., Rydberg, B., Pluth, J. M., et al. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.12.026 · Cited by 58
Spatiotemporal dynamics of homologous recombination repair at single collapsed replication forks
Whelan, D. R., Lee, W. T. C., Yin, Y., Ofri, D. M., Bermudez‐Hernandez, K., Keegan, S., Fenyö, D., & Rothenberg, E. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06435-3 · Cited by 60
Emerging Roles of RAD52 in Genome Maintenance
Jalan, M., Olsen, K. S., & Powell, S. N. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11071038 · Cited by 55
Self-citationMishra, A., Saxena, S., Kaushal, A., & Nagaraju, G. (2017) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00489-17 · Cited by 54
A Polar and Nucleotide-Dependent Mechanism of Action for RAD51 Paralogs in RAD51 Filament Remodeling
Taylor, M. R. G., Špı́rek, M., Ma, C. J., Carzaniga, R., Takaki, T., Collinson, L., Greene, E. C., Krejčí, L., & Boulton, S. J. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.020 · Cited by 52
Contribution of germline deleterious variants in the RAD51 paralogs to breast and ovarian cancers
Golmard, L., Castéra, L., Krieger, S., Caux‐Moncoutier, V., Abidallah, K., Tenreiro, H., Laugé, A., Tarabeux, J., Millot, G. A., Nicolas, A., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-017-0021-2 · Cited by 52
CdSe/ZnS quantum dots induced spermatogenesis dysfunction via autophagy activation
Yang, Q., Li, F., Miao, Y., Luo, X., Dai, S., Liu, J., Niu, W., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122327 · Cited by 49
ter Brugge, P., Moser, S. C., Bièche, I., Kristel, P., Ibadioune, S., Eeckhoutte, A., de Bruijn, R., van der Burg, E., Lutz, C., Annunziato, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37537-2 · Cited by 47
Saxena, S., Dixit, S., Somyajit, K., & Nagaraju, G. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.008 · Cited by 51
Wang, Y., Xiao, R., Wang, H., Cheng, Z., Li, W., Zhu, G., Wang, Y., & Mā, H. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12498 · Cited by 46
RAD51C-XRCC3 structure and cancer patient mutations define DNA replication roles
Longo, M. A., Roy, S., Chen, Y., Tomaszowski, K.-H., Arvai, A. S., Pepper, J. T., Boisvert, R. A., Kunnimalaiyaan, S., Keshvani, C., Schild, D., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40096-1 · Cited by 43
Effects of XRCC2 and RAD51B mutations on somatic and meiotic recombination in A rabidopsis thaliana
Ines, O. D., Degroote, F., Amiard, S., Goubely, C., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. (2013) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12182 · Cited by 45
RAD52 as a Potential Target for Synthetic Lethality-Based Anticancer Therapies
Toma, M. M., Sullivan-Reed, K., Śliwiński, T., & Skórski, T. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11101561 · Cited by 46
Klaric, J. A., Wüst, S., & Panier, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.668821 · Cited by 46
ZNF281 contributes to the DNA damage response by controlling the expression of XRCC2 and XRCC4
Pieraccioli, M., Nicolai, S., Antonov, A. V., Somers, J., Malewicz, M., Melino, G., & Raschellà, G. (2015) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2015.320 · Cited by 44
Positive and negative regulators of RAD51/DMC1 in homologous recombination and DNA replication
Ito, M., Fujita, Y., & Shinohara, A. (2023) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103613 · Cited by 41
XRCC2 Regulates Replication Fork Progression during dNTP Alterations
Saxena, S., Somyajit, K., & Nagaraju, G. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.085 · Cited by 43
Homologous Recombination as a Fundamental Genome Surveillance Mechanism during DNA Replication
Spies, J., Polášek-Sedláčková, H., Lukas, J., & Somyajit, K. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12121960 · Cited by 47
Perturbing cohesin dynamics drives MRE11 nuclease-dependent replication fork slowing
Carvajal-Maldonado, D., Byrum, A. K., Jackson, J., Wessel, S. R., Lemacon, D. S., Guitton-Sert, L., Quinet, A., Tirman, S., Graziano, S., Masson, J., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky519 · Cited by 45
Swi5–Sfr1 stimulates Rad51 recombinase filament assembly by modulating Rad51 dissociation
Lu, C., Yeh, H., Su, G.-C., Ito, K., Kurokawa, Y., Iwasaki, H., Chi, P., & Li, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1812753115 · Cited by 39
Sobczak, M., Pitt, A. R., Spickett, C. M., & Robaszkiewicz, A. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11101539 · Cited by 40
BRG1 Activates Proliferation and Transcription of Cell Cycle-Dependent Genes in Breast Cancer Cells
Sobczak, M., Pietrzak, J., Płoszaj, T., & Robaszkiewicz, A. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12020349 · Cited by 39
BRCA2 chaperones RAD51 to single molecules of RPA-coated ssDNA
Bell, J. C., Dombrowski, C., Plank, J. L., Jensen, R. B., & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2221971120 · Cited by 36
Somyajit, K., Mishra, A., Jameei, A., & Nagaraju, G. (2014) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgu211 · Cited by 38
Zhang, B., Wang, M., Tang, D., Li, Y., Xu, M., Gu, M., Cheng, Z., & Yu, H. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv253 · Cited by 34
On the role of AtDMC1, AtRAD51 and its paralogs during Arabidopsis meiosis
Pradillo, M., Varas, J., Oliver, C., & Santos, J. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00023 · Cited by 33
Chen, X., Li, Y., Ouyang, T., Li, J., Wang, T., Fan, Z., Fan, T., Lin, B., & Xie, Y. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy338 · Cited by 33
Proteomic Analysis Reveals a Novel Mutator S (MutS) Partner Involved in Mismatch Repair Pathway
Chen, Z., Tran, M. K., Tang, M., Wang, W., Gong, Z., & Chen, J. (2016) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m115.056093 · Cited by 33
Gutiérrez‐Enríquez, S., Bonache, S., Ponce, G. R. D. G., Osório, A., Santamariña, M., y Cajal, T. R., Esteban‐Cardeñosa, E., Tenés, A., Yanowsky, K., Barroso, A., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.28540 · Cited by 32
A miR-590/Acvr2a/Rad51b Axis Regulates DNA Damage Repair during mESC Proliferation
Liu, Q., Wang, G., Chen, Y., Li, G., Yang, D., & Kang, J. (2014) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.006 · Cited by 31
Setton, J. S., Selenica, P., Mukherjee, S., Shah, R., Pecorari, I. L., McMillan, B., Pei, X., Kemel, Y. M., Ceyhan‐Birsoy, O., Sheehan, M. R., et al. (2021) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-021-00339-0 · Cited by 31
Self-citationPikkusaari, S., Tumiati, M., Virtanen, A., Oikkonen, J., Li, Y., Pérez‐Villatoro, F., Muranen, T., Salko, M., Huhtinen, K., Kanerva, A., et al. (2023) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3156 · Cited by 29
Growing Recognition of the Role for Rare Missense Substitutions in Breast Cancer Susceptibility
Tavtigian, S. V., & Chenevix‐Trench, G. (2014) · Biomarkers in Medicine · doi:10.2217/bmm.13.143 · Cited by 29
Aberrantly Expressed Timeless Regulates Cell Proliferation and Cisplatin Efficacy in Cervical Cancer
Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., Zou, X., Kuai, L., Wang, L., Wang, J., Shen, F., Hu, J., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., et al. (2019) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2019.080 · Cited by 28
RAD51B plays an essential role during somatic and meiotic recombination in Physcomitrella
Charlot, F., Chelysheva, L. A., Kamisugi, Y., Vrielynck, N., Guyon‐Debast, A., Epert, A., Guin, S. L., Schaefer, D. G., Cuming, A. C., Grelon, M., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku890 · Cited by 28
Cancer TARGETases: DSB repair as a pharmacological target
Samadder, P., Aithal, R., Beláň, O., & Krejčí, L. (2016) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.007 · Cited by 31
Baldock, R. A., Pressimone, C. A., Baird, J. M., Khodakov, A. Y., Luong, T., Grundy, M. K., Smith, C. M., Karpenshif, Y., Bratton-Palmer, D. S., Garcin, E. B., et al. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.008 · Cited by 28
The recombination mediator RAD51D promotes geminiviral infection
Richter, K. S., Serra, H., White, C. I., & Jeske, H. (2016) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2016.03.014 · Cited by 27
Physiological and Pathological Roles of RAD52 at DNA Replication Forks
Malacaria, E., Honda, M., Franchitto, A., Spies, M., & Pichierri, P. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12020402 · Cited by 25
Roles of Rad51 paralogs for promoting homologous recombination in Leishmania infantum
Genois, M., Plourde, M., Éthier, C., Roy, G., Poirier, G. G., Ouellette, M., & Masson, J. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv118 · Cited by 26
Kelm, J. M., Samarbakhsh, A., Pillai, A., VanderVere-Carozza, P. S., Aruri, H., Pandey, D. S., Pawelczak, K. S., Turchi, J. J., & Gavande, N. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.850883 · Cited by 27
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells works via the Fanconi Anemia pathwayPreprint
Richardson, C. D., Kazane, K. R., Feng, S. J., Bray, N. L., Schäfer, A. J., Floor, S. N., & Corn, J. E. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/136028 · Cited by 26
Nowacka‐Zawisza, M., Wiśnik, E., Wasilewski, A., Skowrońska, M., Forma, E., Bryś, M., Różański, W., & Krajewska, W. M. (2015) · Analytical Cellular Pathology · doi:10.1155/2015/828646 · Cited by 25
Andriuskevicius, T., Kotenko, O., & Makovets, S. (2018) · Cell Stress · doi:10.15698/cst2018.05.134 · Cited by 29
The HsRAD51B–HsRAD51C stabilizes the HsRAD51 nucleoprotein filament
Amunugama, R., Groden, J. L., & Fishel, R. A. (2013) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.05.005 · Cited by 24
The homologous recombination protein RAD51D protects the genome from large deletions
Reh, W. A., Nairn, R. S., Lowery, M. P., & Vásquez, K. M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1204 · Cited by 26
PRMT5-regulated splicing of DNA repair genes drives chemoresistance in breast cancer stem cells
Gillespie, M. S., Chiang, K., Regan-Mochrie, G. L., Choi, S., Ward, C. M., Sahay, D., García, P., Arnold, R. R., & Davies, C. C. (2024) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-024-03264-1 · Cited by 27
A decade of RAD51C and RAD51D germline variants in cancer
Boni, J., Idani, A., Roca, C., Feliubadaló, L., Tomiak, E. M., Weber, E., Foulkes, W. D., Orthwein, A., Haffaf, Z. E., Lázaro, C., et al. (2021) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.24319 · Cited by 24
Zhang, F., Shen, Y. X., Miao, C., Cao, Y., Shi, W., Du, G., Tang, D., Li, Y., Luo, Q., & Cheng, Z. (2020) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16595 · Cited by 23
Stackhouse, C. T., Anderson, J. C., Yue, Z., Nguyen, T. M., Eustace, N. J., Langford, C. P., Wang, J., Rowland, J. R., Xing, C., Mikhail, F. M., et al. (2022) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.148717 · Cited by 23
Zhang, R., Endo, H., Takemura, M., & Ogata, H. (2021) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00064-21 · Cited by 21
RAD51-Mediated DNA Homologous Recombination Is Independent of PTEN Mutational Status
Sinha, A., Saleh, A. J., Endersby, R., Yuan, S. H., Chokshi, C., Brown, K. R., Kuzio, B., Kauppinen, T. M., Singh, S. K., Baker, S. J., et al. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12113178 · Cited by 20
Sexual Dimorphism in Mouse Meiosis
Hua, R., & Liu, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.670599 · Cited by 19
Crosstalk between CST and RPA regulates RAD51 activity during replication stress
Lei, K., Yang, H., Chang, H.-Y., Yeh, H., Nguyen, D.-D., Lee, T.-Y., Lyu, X., Chastain, M., Chai, W., Li, H., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26624-x · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Chun, J., Buechelmaier, E. S., & Powell, S. N.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 387-395
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC3554112
- OpenAlex
- W2098812676
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA107640, R01CA169306, CA107640, P30CA008748)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Keywords
- RAD51 paralogs, homologous recombination, BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD52, epistasis, synthetic lethality, DNA damage response, genome stability
- MeSH terms
- Cell Line, DNA Damage, DNA-Binding Proteins, Epistasis, Genetic, Humans, Microscopy, Confocal, BRCA2 Protein, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Rad51 Recombinase, Rad52 DNA Repair and Recombination Protein, Homologous Recombination, MCF-7 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review