The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combinatorial Interactions between AP-1 and ets Domain Proteins Contribute to the Developmental Regulation of the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor Gene
Abstract
Macrophage development is regulated by a complex set of hormone-like molecules and cell adhesion events that control the growth and differentiation of progenitor cells. The macrophage scavenger receptor (SR) gene becomes markedly upregulated during the final stages of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and provides a model for the identification and characterization of transcription factors that control this process. In this report, we have identified three genomic regulatory elements that are required for transactivation of the SR gene in the THP-1 monocytic leukemia cell line following induction of macrophage differentiation by tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate. Each of these regulatory elements contains a near-consensus binding site for members of the AP-1 gene family, while the two most quantitatively important elements also contain juxtaposed binding sites for ets domain transcription factors. We demonstrate that tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate treatment results in a marked and prolonged increase in AP-1 binding activity on these elements, which can be accounted for almost entirely by c-jun and junB. These proteins in turn form ternary complexes with additional factors that bind to the adjacent ets recognition motifs. Several indirect lines of evidence indicate that ets2 represents a component of this ternary complex. The combined expression of c-jun, ets2, and a constitutive form of ras result in synergistic increases in transcription from promoters containing the SR regulatory elements. These observations suggest that SR gene expression is regulated via a signal transduction pathway involving ras, AP-1, and ets domain proteins and imply that at least some of the signalling components involved in ras-dependent growth are also utilized to promote the expression of genes involved in terminal differentiation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The block in the development of these lineages occurs at very early stages, because the mutant animals completely lack lymphoid and myeloid progenitor cells, rendering it difficult to determine the precise role of PU.1 during stage- and lineage-specific gene expression.”
From AKT Induces Transcriptional Activity of PU.1 through Phosphorylation-mediated Modifications within Its Transactivation Domain (2001) · cites this paper as [70]
In the citing paper
“Targeted disruption of PU.1 in mice severely impairs the development of lymphoid (B cells) and myeloid (macrophages and neutrophils) lineages.”
From AKT Induces Transcriptional Activity of PU.1 through Phosphorylation-mediated Modifications within Its Transactivation Domain (2001) · cites this paper as [70]
Citations
Cites
The jun proto-oncogene is positively autoregulated by its product, Jun/AP-1
Angel, P., Hattori, K., Smeal, T., & Karin, M. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90143-2 · Cited by 1,239
Smeal, T., Binetruy, B., Mercola, D. A., Birrer, M., & Karin, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354494a0 · Cited by 789
Pongubala, J. M., Nagulapalli, S., Klemsz, M. J., McKercher, S. R., Maki, R. A., & Atchison, M. L. (1992) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.12.1.368 · Cited by 354
Moulton, K. S., Semple, K., Wu, H., & Glass, C. K. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.7.4408 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is a negative regulator of macrophage activation
Ricote, M., Li, A. C., Willson, T. M., Kelly, C. J., & Glass, C. K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34178 · Cited by 3,525
Self-citationTranscription Factors, Normal Myeloid Development, and Leukemia
Tenen, D. G., Hromas, R., Licht, J. D., & Zhang, D.-E. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v90.2.489 · Cited by 735
Specificity within the ets Family of Transcription Factors
(1998) · Advances in Cancer Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60738-1 · Cited by 344
Yang, B.-S., Hauser, C. A., Henkel, G., Colman, M. S., Beveren, C. V., Stacey, K. J., Hume, D. A., Maki, R. A., & Ostrowski, M. C. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.2.538 · Cited by 333
The Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor δ Promotes Lipid Accumulation in Human Macrophages
Vosper, H., Patel, L., Graham, T. L., Khoudoli, G. A., Hill, A., Macphee, C. H., Pinto, I., Smith, S. A., Suckling, K. E., Wolf, C. R., et al. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m108482200 · Cited by 268
A direct physical association between ETS and AP-1 transcription factors in normal human T cells
Bassuk, A. G., & Leiden, J. M. (1995) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/1074-7613(95)90092-6 · Cited by 186
Moulton, K. S., Semple, K., Wu, H., & Glass, C. K. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.7.4408 · Cited by 86
Self-citationLi, A. C., Guidez, F. R. B., Collier, J. G., & Glass, C. K. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.9.5389 · Cited by 60
Self-citationRieske, P., & Pongubala, J. R. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m007482200 · Cited by 54
Genetic analysis of ETS genes in C. elegans
Hart, A. H., Reventar, R., & Bernstein, A. (2000) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204040 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, H., Moulton, K., Horvai, A., Parik, S., & Glass, C. K.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2129-2139
- ISSN
- 0270-7306
- 1098-5549
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review