The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Mechanisms Regulate Imprinting of the Mouse Distal Chromosome 7 Gene Cluster
Open accessAbstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic process that results in the preferential silencing of one of the two parental copies of a gene. Although the precise mechanisms by which genomic imprinting occurs are unknown, the tendency of imprinted genes to exist in chromosomal clusters suggests long-range regulation through shared regulatory elements. We characterize a 800-kb region on the distal end of mouse chromosome 7 that contains a cluster of four maternally expressed genes, H19, Mash2, Kvlqt1, and p57(Kip2), as well as two paternally expressed genes, Igf2 and Ins2, and assess the expression and imprinting of Mash2, Kvlqt1, and p57(Kip2) during development in embryonic and extraembryonic tissues. Unlike Igf2 and Ins2, which depend on H19 for their imprinting, Mash2, p57(Kip2), and Kvlqt1 are unaffected by a deletion of the H19 gene region, suggesting that these more telomeric genes are not regulated by the mechanism that controls H19, Igf2, and Ins2. Mutations in human p57(Kip2) have been implicated in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, a disease that has also been associated with loss of imprinting of IGF2. We find, however, that a deletion of the gene has no effect on imprinting within the cluster. Surprisingly, the three maternally expressed genes are regulated very differently by DNA methylation; p57(Kip2) is activated, Kvlqt1 is silenced, and Mash2 is unaffected in mice lacking DNA methyltransferase. We conclude that H19 is not a global regulator of imprinting on distal chromosome 7 and that the telomeric genes are imprinted by a separate mechanism(s).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Glenn, C. (1997) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/3.4.321 · Cited by 145
Cited by
DNA methylation and its basic function
Moore, L. D., Le, T., & Fan, G. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.112 · Cited by 4,906
Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome
Reik, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35047554 · Cited by 2,285
The DNA methyltransferases of mammals
Bestor, T. H. (2000) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/9.16.2395 · Cited by 2,041
Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development
Li, E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg887 · Cited by 1,900
Hata, K., Okano, M., Lei, H., & Li, E. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.8.1983 · Cited by 1,039
Metadata
- Authors
- Caspary, T., Cleary, M. A., Baker, C. C., Guan, X.-J., & Tilghman, S. M.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3466-3474
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2107345366
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Mechanisms Regulate Imprinting of the Mouse Distal Chromosome 7 Gene Cluster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.18.6.3466
- The paper
- Caspary, T., Cleary, M. A., Baker, C. C., Guan, X.-J., & Tilghman, S. M. (1998). Multiple Mechanisms Regulate Imprinting of the Mouse Distal Chromosome 7 Gene Cluster. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.6.3466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.