The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct p53 Transcriptional Repression: In Vivo Analysis of CCAAT-Containing G2/M Promoters
Open accessAbstract
In response to DNA damage, p53 activates G(1)/S blocking and apoptotic genes through sequence-specific binding. p53 also represses genes with no target site, such as those for Cdc2 and cyclin B, key regulators of the G(2)/M transition. Like most G(2)/M promoters, they rely on multiple CCAAT boxes activated by NF-Y, whose binding to DNA is temporally regulated during the cell cycle. NF-Y associates with p53 in vitro and in vivo through the alphaC helix of NF-YC (a subunit of NF-Y) and a region close to the tetramerization domain of p53. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that p53 is associated with cyclin B2, CDC25C, and Cdc2 promoters in vivo before and after DNA damage, requiring DNA-bound NF-Y. Following DNA damage, p53 is rapidly acetylated at K320 and K373 to K382, histones are deacetylated, and the release of PCAF and p300 correlates with the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs)-HDAC1 before HDAC4 and HDAC5-and promoter repression. HDAC recruitment requires intact NF-Y binding sites. In transfection assays, PCAF represses cyclin B2, and a nonacetylated p53 mutant shows a complete loss of repression potential, despite its abilities to bind NF-Y and to be recruited on G(2)/M promoters. These data (i) detail a strategy of direct p53 repression through associations with multiple NF-Y trimers that is independent of sequence-specific binding of p53 and that requires C-terminal acetylation, (ii) suggest that p53 is a DNA damage sentinel of the G(2)/M transition, and (iii) delineate a new role for PCAF in cell cycle control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation–acetylation cascade
Sakaguchi, K., Herrera, J. E., Saito, S., Miki, T., Bustin, M., Vassilev, A., Anderson, C. W., & Appella, E. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.18.2831 · Cited by 1,204
E2F integrates cell cycle progression with DNA repair, replication, and G 2 /M checkpoints
Ren, B., Cam, H., Takahashi, Y., Volkert, T., Terragni, J., Young, R. A., & Dynlacht, B. D. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.949802 · Cited by 1,125
p53 Sites Acetylated In Vitro by PCAF and p300 Are Acetylated In Vivo in Response to DNA Damage
Liu, L., Scolnick, D. M., Trievel, R. C., Zhang, H. B., Marmorstein, R., Halazonetis, T. D., & Berger, S. L. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.2.1202 · Cited by 776
Target gene specificity of E2F and pocket protein family members in living cells
Wells, J., Boyd, K. E., Fry, C. J., Bartley, S. M., & Farnham, P. J. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.16.5797-5807.2000 · Cited by 229
p21/CDKN1A Mediates Negative Regulation of Transcription by p53
Löhr, K., Möritz, C., Contente, A., & Dobbelstein, M. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m212517200 · Cited by 227
Self-citationp53 Regulation of G 2 Checkpoint Is Retinoblastoma Protein Dependent
Flatt, P. M., Tang, L. J., Scatena, C. D., Szak, S. T., & Pietenpol, J. A. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.12.4210-4223.2000 · Cited by 161
The G2 Checkpoint Is Maintained by Redundant Pathways
Passalaris, T. M., Benanti, J. A., Gewin, L., Kiyono, T., & Galloway, D. A. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.9.5872 · Cited by 116
p130/E2F4 Binds to and Represses the cdc2 Promoter in Response to p53
Taylor, W. R., Schönthal, A. H., Galante, J., & Stark, G. R. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m005101200 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Vousden, K. H., & Prives, C. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037 · Cited by 3,163
Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes
Riley, T., Sontag, E., Chen, P., & Levine, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2395 · Cited by 1,921
When mutants gain new powers: News from the mutant p53 field
Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2693 · Cited by 1,132
Census and evaluation of p53 target genes
Fischer, M. (2017) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2016.502 · Cited by 971
Transcriptional Regulation by P53
Beckerman, R., & Prives, C. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000935 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Imbriano, C., Gurtner, A., Cocchiarella, F., Di Agostino, S., Basile, V., Gostissa, M., Dobbelstein, M., Del Sal, G., Piaggio, G., & Mantovani, R.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3737-3751
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2120677007
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct p53 Transcriptional Repression: In Vivo Analysis of CCAAT-Containing G2/M Promoters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.25.9.3737-3751.2005
- The paper
- Imbriano, C., Gurtner, A., Cocchiarella, F., Di Agostino, S., Basile, V., Gostissa, M., Dobbelstein, M., Del Sal, G., Piaggio, G., & Mantovani, R. (2005). Direct p53 Transcriptional Repression: In Vivo Analysis of CCAAT-Containing G2/M Promoters. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.25.9.3737-3751.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.