Fidelity of Two Retroviral Reverse Transcriptases during DNA-Dependent DNA Synthesis In Vitro
Open accessAbstract
We determined the fidelity of avian myeloblastosis virus and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptases (RTs) during DNA synthesis in vitro using the M13mp2 lacZ alpha gene as a mutational target. Both RTs commit an error approximately once for every 30,000 nucleotides polymerized. DNA sequence analysis of mutants generated in a forward mutation assay capable of detecting many types of errors demonstrated that avian myeloblastosis virus RT produced a variety of different mutations. The majority (58%) were single-base substitutions; all of which resulted from the misincorporation of either dAMP or dGMP. Minus-one frameshifts were also common, composing about 30% of the mutations. In addition to single-base events, eight mutants contained sequence changes involving from 2 to 59 bases. The frequency of these mutants suggests that, at least during DNA synthesis in vitro, RTs also commit errors by mechanisms other than classical base miscoding and misalignment. We examined the ability of RTs to synthesize DNA from a mismatched primer terminus at a sequence where the mismatched base was complementary to the next base in the template. Unlike cellular DNA polymerases which polymerize from the mismatched template-primer, RTs preferred to polymerize from a rearranged template-primer containing a matched terminal base pair and an unpaired base in the template strand. The unusual preference for this substrate suggests that the interactions between RTs and the template-primer are different from those of cellular DNA polymerases. The overall error rate of RT in vitro is sufficient to account for the estimated mutation rate of these viruses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In cell-free assays of DNA-dependent DNA synthesis, AMV and MLV RTs introduce nearly 10-fold fewer mutations than HIV-1 RT.
“Based on cell-free assays designed to read mutations during DNA-dependent DNA synthesis, it has been shown that AMV and MLV RTs introduce nearly 10-fold fewer mutations when compared to HIV-1 RT (Roberts et al. 1988, 1989, Barrioluengo et al. 2012).”
From Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication (2026) · cites this paper as Roberts et al. 1989
Cites
Viral RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase: RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase in Virions of Rous Sarcoma Virus
TEMIN, H. M., & MIZUTANI, S. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2261211a0 · Cited by 2,128 · see citing works
Viral RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase: RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase in Virions of RNA Tumour Viruses
BALTIMORE, D. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2261209a0 · Cited by 2,068 · see citing works
Schiff, R. D., & Grandgenett, D. P. (1978) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.28.1.279-291.1978 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities
Ozsolak, F., & Milos, P. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2934 · Cited by 2,135 · see citing works
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Self-citationActive Site Tightness and Substrate Fit in DNA Replication
Kool, E. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135453 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Viral error catastrophe by mutagenic nucleosides
Anderson, J. P., Daifuku, R., & Loeb, L. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123649 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationFidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase copying RNA in vitro
Ji, J., & Loeb, L. A. (1992) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00119a002 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationMenéndez-Arias, L., Sebastián-Martín, A., & Álvarez, M. (2017) · Virus Research · doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2016.12.019 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication
Jehad, M. A., Ali, L. M., Pillai, V. N., Prabhu, S. G., Mustafa, F., & Rizvi, T. A. (2026) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaf066 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roberts, J. D., Preston, B. D., Johnston, L. A., Soni, A., Loeb, L. A., & Kunkel, T. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 469-476
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC362622
- OpenAlex
- W2145664181
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
- Keywords
- retroviral reverse transcriptase, avian myeloblastosis virus, Moloney murine leukemia virus, forward mutation assay, single base substitution, mismatched primers, viral mutation rate
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Codon, DNA, Viral, Genes, Viral, Molecular Sequence Data, Moloney murine leukemia virus, Mutagenicity Tests, Mutation, Avian Myeloblastosis Virus, Retroviridae, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review