The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial-Fungal Interactions: Hyphens between Agricultural, Clinical, Environmental, and Food Microbiologists
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Bacteria and fungi can form a range of physical associations that depend on various modes of molecular communication for their development and functioning. These bacterial-fungal interactions often result in changes to the pathogenicity or the nutritional influence of one or both partners toward plants or animals (including humans). They can also result in unique contributions to biogeochemical cycles and biotechnological processes. Thus, the interactions between bacteria and fungi are of central importance to numerous biological questions in agriculture, forestry, environmental science, food production, and medicine. Here we present a structured review of bacterial-fungal interactions, illustrated by examples sourced from many diverse scientific fields. We consider the general and specific properties of these interactions, providing a global perspective across this emerging multidisciplinary research area. We show that in many cases, parallels can be drawn between different scenarios in which bacterial-fungal interactions are important. Finally, we discuss how new avenues of investigation may enhance our ability to combat, manipulate, or exploit bacterial-fungal complexes for the economic and practical benefit of humanity as well as reshape our current understanding of bacterial and fungal ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing
MetaHIT Consortium, Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08821 · Cited by 11,624
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00029-06 · Cited by 4,174 · cited 1×
“Most studies of clinical BFIs to date have focused on Candida albicans (366, 397), a yeast which is common in the buccal, dermal, and intestinal human microbiota but which can also cause a large number of infections (308).”
BackgroundBerg, G. (2009) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7 · Cited by 1,648
Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals
Ghannoum, M. A., Jurevic, R. J., Mukherjee, P. K., Cui, F., Sikaroodi, M., Naqvi, A., & Gillevet, P. M. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000713 · Cited by 1,150 · cited 1×
“A recent study of 20 healthy individuals revealed a variety of culturable and nonculturable fungi to be present in this setting (130).”
BackgroundFood fermentations: Role of microorganisms in food production and preservation
Caplice, E. (1999) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00082-3 · Cited by 1,052
Yeast interactions and wine flavour
Fleet, G. (2003) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00245-9 · Cited by 1,020
A Catalog of Reference Genomes from the Human Microbiome
The Human Microbiome Jumpstart Reference Strains Consortium, Nelson, K. E., Weinstock, G. M., Highlander, S. K., Worley, K. C., Creasy, H. H., Wortman, J. R., Rusch, D. B., Mitreva, M., Sodergren, E., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183605 · Cited by 702
Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives
Schnürer, J., & Magnusson, J. (2005) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.014 · Cited by 702
Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions
Peleg, A. Y., Hogan, D. A., & Mylonakis, E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2313 · Cited by 619
Cited by
Pan-cancer analyses reveal cancer-type-specific fungal ecologies and bacteriome interactions
Narunsky-Haziza, L., Sepich-Poore, G. D., Livyatan, I., Asraf, O., Martino, C., Nejman, D., Gavert, N., Stajich, J. E., Amit, G., González, A., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.005 · Cited by 538
“Symbiotic and antagonistic relationships between fungi and bacteria (Frey-Klett et al., 2011; Peleg et al., 2010; Shiao et al., 2021) further motivate studying their interactions in tumors, and recent data suggest that combining their information provides synergistic diagnostic performance for colorectal cancer (Liu e…”
BackgroundMarine crude-oil biodegradation: a central role for interspecies interactions
McGenity, T. J., Folwell, B. D., McKew, B. A., & Sanni, G. O. (2012) · Aquatic Biosystems · doi:10.1186/2046-9063-8-10 · Cited by 430
Cawoy, H., Debois, D., Franzil, L., De Pauw, E., Thonart, P., & Ongena, M. (2015) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.12238 · Cited by 332
Kim, D., Sengupta, A., Niepa, T. H. R., Lee, B.-H., Weljie, A., Freitas-Blanco, V. S., Murata, R. M., Stebe, K. J., Lee, D., & Koo, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41332 · Cited by 199
Briard, B., Heddergott, C., & Latgé, J.-P. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00219-16 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Frey-Klett, P., Burlinson, P., Deveau, A., Barret, M., Tarkka, M., & Sarniguet, A.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-609
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2144181899
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial-Fungal Interactions: Hyphens between Agricultural, Clinical, Environmental, and Food Microbiologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.00020-11
- The paper
- Frey-Klett, P., Burlinson, P., Deveau, A., Barret, M., Tarkka, M., & Sarniguet, A. (2011). Bacterial-Fungal Interactions: Hyphens between Agricultural, Clinical, Environmental, and Food Microbiologists. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00020-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
