Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons

Open access
Häse, Claudia C., Fedorova, Natalie D., Galperin, Michael Y., Dibrov, Pavel A.·2001·Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews

Abstract

SUMMARY: Analysis of the bacterial genome sequences shows that many human and animal pathogens encode primary membrane Na + pumps, Na + -transporting dicarboxylate decarboxylases or Na + -translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, and a number of Na + -dependent permeases. This indicates that these bacteria can utilize Na + as a coupling ion instead of or in addition to the H + cycle. This capability to use a Na + cycle might be an important virulence factor for such pathogens as Vibrio cholerae, Neisseria meningitidis, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, and Yersinia pestis. In Treponema pallidum, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Chlamydia pneumoniae, the Na + gradient may well be the only energy source for secondary transport. A survey of preliminary genome sequences of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, and Treponema denticola indicates that these oral pathogens also rely on the Na + cycle for at least part of their energy metabolism. The possible roles of the Na + cycling in the energy metabolism and pathogenicity of these organisms are reviewed. The recent discovery of an effective natural antibiotic, korormicin, targeted against the Na + -translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, suggests a potential use of Na + pumps as drug targets and/or vaccine candidates. The antimicrobial potential of other inhibitors of the Na + cycle, such as monensin, Li + and Ag + ions, and amiloride derivatives, is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mmbr.65.3.353-370.2001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Häse, C. C., Fedorova, N. D., Galperin, M. Y., & Dibrov, P. A.
Venue
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
Published
2001-09
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
353-370
ISSN
  • 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5557
OpenAlex
W2164466125
Cited by
233
References
1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.65.3.353-370.2001
The paper
Häse, C. C., Fedorova, N. D., Galperin, M. Y., & Dibrov, P. A. (2001). Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.65.3.353-370.2001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.