The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Analysis of the bacterial genome sequences shows that many human and animal pathogens encode primary membrane Na + pumps, Na + -transporting dicarboxylate decarboxylases or Na + -translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, and a number of Na + -dependent permeases. This indicates that these bacteria can utilize Na + as a coupling ion instead of or in addition to the H + cycle. This capability to use a Na + cycle might be an important virulence factor for such pathogens as Vibrio cholerae, Neisseria meningitidis, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, and Yersinia pestis. In Treponema pallidum, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Chlamydia pneumoniae, the Na + gradient may well be the only energy source for secondary transport. A survey of preliminary genome sequences of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, and Treponema denticola indicates that these oral pathogens also rely on the Na + cycle for at least part of their energy metabolism. The possible roles of the Na + cycling in the energy metabolism and pathogenicity of these organisms are reviewed. The recent discovery of an effective natural antibiotic, korormicin, targeted against the Na + -translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, suggests a potential use of Na + pumps as drug targets and/or vaccine candidates. The antimicrobial potential of other inhibitors of the Na + cycle, such as monensin, Li + and Ag + ions, and amiloride derivatives, is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pao, S. S., Paulsen, I. T., & Saier, M. H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.1.1-34.1998 · Cited by 2,297
Cited by
Holt, S. C., & Ebersole, J. L. (2005) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00113.x · Cited by 932
Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases
Mascher, T., Helmann, J. D., & Unden, G. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00020-06 · Cited by 721
D'Argenio, D. A., Wu, M., Hoffman, L. R., Kulasekara, H. D., Déziel, E., Smith, E. E., Nguyen, H., Ernst, R. K., Larson Freeman, T. J., Spencer, D. H., et al. (2007) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05678.x · Cited by 342
Bacterial signal transduction network in a genomic perspective †
Galperin, M. Y. (2004) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00633.x · Cited by 340
Self-citationMetabolic Interdependence of Obligate Intracellular Bacteria and Their Insect Hosts
Zientz, E., Dandekar, T., & Gross, R. (2004) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.4.745-770.2004 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Häse, C. C., Fedorova, N. D., Galperin, M. Y., & Dibrov, P. A.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-370
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2164466125
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.65.3.353-370.2001
- The paper
- Häse, C. C., Fedorova, N. D., Galperin, M. Y., & Dibrov, P. A. (2001). Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.65.3.353-370.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.