The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Genomic Analyses of the Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: We report analyses of 202 fully sequenced genomes for homologues of known protein constituents of the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS). These included 174 bacterial, 19 archaeal, and 9 eukaryotic genomes. Homologues of PTS proteins were not identified in archaea or eukaryotes, showing that the horizontal transfer of genes encoding PTS proteins has not occurred between the three domains of life. Of the 174 bacterial genomes (136 bacterial species) analyzed, 30 diverse species have no PTS homologues, and 29 species have cytoplasmic PTS phosphoryl transfer protein homologues but lack recognizable PTS permeases. These soluble homologues presumably function in regulation. The remaining 77 species possess all PTS proteins required for the transport and phosphorylation of at least one sugar via the PTS. Up to 3.2% of the genes in a bacterium encode PTS proteins. These homologues were analyzed for family association, range of protein types, domain organization, and organismal distribution. Different strains of a single bacterial species often possess strikingly different complements of PTS proteins. Types of PTS protein domain fusions were analyzed, showing that certain types of domain fusions are common, while others are rare or prohibited. Select PTS proteins were analyzed from different phylogenetic standpoints, showing that PTS protein phylogeny often differs from organismal phylogeny. The results document the frequent gain and loss of PTS protein-encoding genes and suggest that the lateral transfer of these genes within the bacterial domain has played an important role in bacterial evolution. Our studies provide insight into the development of complex multicomponent enzyme systems and lead to predictions regarding the types of protein-protein interactions that promote efficient PTS-mediated phosphoryl transfer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pao, S. S., Paulsen, I. T., & Saier, M. H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.1.1-34.1998 · Cited by 2,297
Self-citation
Cited by
Chen, L.-Q., Cheung, L. S., Feng, L., Tanner, W., & Frommer, W. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033904 · Cited by 507
Deutscher, J., Aké, F. M. D., Derkaoui, M., Zébré, A. C., Cao, T. N., Bouraoui, H., Kentache, T., Mokhtari, A., Milohanic, E., & Joyet, P. (2014) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-14 · Cited by 428
Jeckelmann, J.-M., & Erni, B. (2019) · Subcellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18768-2_8 · Cited by 55
Jiang, L., Li, S., Hu, Y., Xu, Q., & Huang, H. (2012) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.23346 · Cited by 36
Francl, A. L., Hoeflinger, J. L., & Miller, M. J. (2012) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.052928-0 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Barabote, R. D., & Saier, M. H.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 608-634
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2138956739
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomic Analyses of the Bacterial Phosphotransferase System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.69.4.608-634.2005
- The paper
- Barabote, R. D., & Saier, M. H. (2005). Comparative Genomic Analyses of the Bacterial Phosphotransferase System. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.69.4.608-634.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.