The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of fungal communities transmitted from sow to piglet
Abstract
Understanding the composition of the healthy gut microbiota in neonatal piglets is critical during the early stages of life, particularly in the context of environmental change and immune development. The gut microbiota of newborn piglets is closely related to that of their sows. However, research on the characteristics of gut microbiota transmitted from mother to offspring has primarily focused on gut bacteria, with comparatively less attention given to gut fungi. In this study, vaginal and fecal samples were collected from 12 sows, along with fecal samples from 12 newborn piglets. The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) rRNA gene was sequenced to characterize the gut fungal communities. The results indicated that sow feces exhibited the greatest diversity of fungal communities, followed by piglet feces, while the least diverse fungal communities were found in sow vaginas. Significant differences in beta diversity of fungal communities were observed among the three groups, with clear segregation of the fungal communities. The composition of gut fungal communities in sow vaginas and feces, as well as in piglet feces, was dominated by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Fast expectation-maximization microbial source tracking (FEAST) analysis showed that 47.1 and 4.2% of the fungal communities in piglet feces originated from sow feces and sow vagina, respectively, while the remaining 48.7% were from unknown sources. At both the genus and species levels, six fungal genera or species were identified among the top fungal taxa across the three groups, suggesting that they may represent core dominant fungi transmitted from sows to piglets. Functional predictions for all three groups of fungal communities were associated with animal pathogens. These findings contribute to our understanding of the microbiological composition of the gut during early life and highlight the importance of fungal communities. IMPORTANCE: Our results highlight the association between sow fecal and piglet fecal fungal communities. The findings indicate significant differences among the fungal communities in maternal feces, maternal vagina, and piglet feces. However, the fungal communities in maternal feces and piglet feces were more similar to each other than to those found in the maternal vagina, suggesting potential vertical transmission to newborn piglets. This study describes the structure and composition of fungal communities in maternal feces, maternal vagina, and piglet feces, providing insights into the gut microbial composition during early life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Archaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents
Hoffmann, C., Dollive, S., Grunberg, S., Chen, J., Li, H., Wu, G. D., Lewis, J. D., & Bushman, F. D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066019 · Cited by 808 · cited 1×
“In our study, the gut fungal communities in the maternal vagina and feces, as well as in piglet feces, were predominantly composed of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, consistent with previous studies in humans and mice (2, 29, 30), weaned piglets (31), cattle (32), and sheep (33).”
Jašarević, E., Howerton, C. L., Howard, C. D., & Bale, T. L. (2015) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2015-1177 · Cited by 329
Briard, B., Mislin, G. L. A., Latgé, J.-P., & Beauvais, A. (2019) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof5020048 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1038/nature08821 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/mSphere.00351-17 · DOI
- 10.3852/15-147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00248-017-1105-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/jas/skz182 · DOI
- 10.3390/ani9050268 · doi:10.3390/ani9050268
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050177 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/microorganisms8060868 · DOI
- 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815bb69d · DOI
- 10.1128/mSystems.00140-17 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0169851 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-019-43031-x · DOI
- 10.1002/imt2.160 · DOI
- 10.1038/ismej.2016.77 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03045 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms19082407 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-24289-z · DOI
- 10.1002/mnfr.202370029 · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202370029
- 10.1186/s40168-019-0721-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00441-020-03206-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0431-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/jvi.00477-22 · DOI
- 10.1080/19490976.2018.1518554 · DOI
- 10.1111/1751-7915.13507 · DOI
- 10.3390/microorganisms10061155 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.72.1.793-801.2006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12866-021-02242-x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0953756201003884 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0036866 · DOI
- 10.1128/aem.01593-22 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40168-023-01468-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41522-023-00433-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00248-020-01677-5 · DOI
- 10.3390/microorganisms7090349 · DOI
- 10.1177/030098588101800505 · doi:10.1177/030098588101800505
- 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15287394.2012.721170 · DOI
- 10.1136/vr.116.13.350 · doi:10.1136/vr.116.13.350
- 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02850 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0901870106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.riam.2016.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1099/jmm.0.000024 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41396-018-0303-x · DOI
- 10.1111/ele.12631 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2527/jas.2008-1328 · doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1328
- 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.3869 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/s23115078 · DOI
- 10.18637/jss.v087.c03 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/ice.2019.75 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., Song, M., Ling, Y., Wu, Z., Xiong, W., Tao, S., & Shen, Y.
- Venue
- Microbiology Spectrum
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2025-10-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 2165-0497
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
- journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of fungal communities transmitted from sow to piglet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/spectrum.02078-24
- The paper
- Fan, J., Song, M., Ling, Y., Wu, Z., Xiong, W., Tao, S., & Shen, Y. (2025). Characterization of fungal communities transmitted from sow to piglet. Microbiology Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02078-24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.