Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of fungal communities transmitted from sow to piglet

Fan, Jinping, Song, Mengzhen, Ling, Yanguang, Wu, Zhifeng, Xiong, Wen, Tao, Shiyu, Shen, Yaoqin·2025·Microbiology Spectrum

Abstract

Understanding the composition of the healthy gut microbiota in neonatal piglets is critical during the early stages of life, particularly in the context of environmental change and immune development. The gut microbiota of newborn piglets is closely related to that of their sows. However, research on the characteristics of gut microbiota transmitted from mother to offspring has primarily focused on gut bacteria, with comparatively less attention given to gut fungi. In this study, vaginal and fecal samples were collected from 12 sows, along with fecal samples from 12 newborn piglets. The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) rRNA gene was sequenced to characterize the gut fungal communities. The results indicated that sow feces exhibited the greatest diversity of fungal communities, followed by piglet feces, while the least diverse fungal communities were found in sow vaginas. Significant differences in beta diversity of fungal communities were observed among the three groups, with clear segregation of the fungal communities. The composition of gut fungal communities in sow vaginas and feces, as well as in piglet feces, was dominated by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Fast expectation-maximization microbial source tracking (FEAST) analysis showed that 47.1 and 4.2% of the fungal communities in piglet feces originated from sow feces and sow vagina, respectively, while the remaining 48.7% were from unknown sources. At both the genus and species levels, six fungal genera or species were identified among the top fungal taxa across the three groups, suggesting that they may represent core dominant fungi transmitted from sows to piglets. Functional predictions for all three groups of fungal communities were associated with animal pathogens. These findings contribute to our understanding of the microbiological composition of the gut during early life and highlight the importance of fungal communities. IMPORTANCE: Our results highlight the association between sow fecal and piglet fecal fungal communities. The findings indicate significant differences among the fungal communities in maternal feces, maternal vagina, and piglet feces. However, the fungal communities in maternal feces and piglet feces were more similar to each other than to those found in the maternal vagina, suggesting potential vertical transmission to newborn piglets. This study describes the structure and composition of fungal communities in maternal feces, maternal vagina, and piglet feces, providing insights into the gut microbial composition during early life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/spectrum.02078-24

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1038/nature08821 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1128/mSphere.00351-17 · DOI
  3. 10.3852/15-147 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s00248-017-1105-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/jas/skz182 · DOI
  6. 10.3390/ani9050268 · doi:10.3390/ani9050268
  7. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050177 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3390/microorganisms8060868 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815bb69d · DOI
  10. 10.1128/mSystems.00140-17 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169851 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s41598-019-43031-x · DOI
  13. 10.1002/imt2.160 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ismej.2016.77 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03045 · DOI
  16. 10.3390/ijms19082407 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41598-018-24289-z · DOI
  18. 10.1002/mnfr.202370029 · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202370029
  19. 10.1186/s40168-019-0721-7 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/s00441-020-03206-9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.161 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41592-019-0431-x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1128/jvi.00477-22 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/19490976.2018.1518554 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1751-7915.13507 · DOI
  26. 10.3390/microorganisms10061155 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/AEM.72.1.793-801.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1186/s12866-021-02242-x · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S0953756201003884 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036866 · DOI
  32. 10.1128/aem.01593-22 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/s40168-023-01468-3 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41522-023-00433-0 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s00248-020-01677-5 · DOI
  36. 10.3390/microorganisms7090349 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/030098588101800505 · doi:10.1177/030098588101800505
  38. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01524 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1080/15287394.2012.721170 · DOI
  40. 10.1136/vr.116.13.350 · doi:10.1136/vr.116.13.350
  41. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02850 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0901870106 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.riam.2016.09.001 · DOI
  44. 10.1099/jmm.0.000024 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41396-018-0303-x · DOI
  46. 10.1111/ele.12631 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.2527/jas.2008-1328 · doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1328
  48. 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1038/nmeth.3869 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.3390/s23115078 · DOI
  56. 10.18637/jss.v087.c03 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1017/ice.2019.75 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gky1022 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Fan, J., Song, M., Ling, Y., Wu, Z., Xiong, W., Tao, S., & Shen, Y.
Venue
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2025-10-07
Volume
13
Issue
10
ISSN
2165-0497
Cited by
0
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of fungal communities transmitted from sow to piglet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/spectrum.02078-24
The paper
Fan, J., Song, M., Ling, Y., Wu, Z., Xiong, W., Tao, S., & Shen, Y. (2025). Characterization of fungal communities transmitted from sow to piglet. Microbiology Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02078-24

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.