Cited by 816Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Archaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents

Open access
Hoffmann, Christian, Dollive, Serena, Grunberg, Stephanie, Chen, Jun, Li, Hongzhe, Wu, Gary D., Lewis, James D., Bushman, Frederic D.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Diet influences health as a source of nutrients and toxins, and by shaping the composition of resident microbial populations. Previous studies have begun to map out associations between diet and the bacteria and viruses of the human gut microbiome. Here we investigate associations of diet with fungal and archaeal populations, taking advantage of samples from 98 well-characterized individuals. Diet was quantified using inventories scoring both long-term and recent diet, and archaea and fungi were characterized by deep sequencing of marker genes in DNA purified from stool. For fungi, we found 66 genera, with generally mutually exclusive presence of either the phyla Ascomycota or Basiodiomycota. For archaea, Methanobrevibacter was the most prevalent genus, present in 30% of samples. Several other archaeal genera were detected in lower abundance and frequency. Myriad associations were detected for fungi and archaea with diet, with each other, and with bacterial lineages. Methanobrevibacter and Candida were positively associated with diets high in carbohydrates, but negatively with diets high in amino acids, protein, and fatty acids. A previous study emphasized that bacterial population structure was associated primarily with long-term diet, but high Candida abundance was most strongly associated with the recent consumption of carbohydrates. Methobrevibacter abundance was associated with both long term and recent consumption of carbohydrates. These results confirm earlier targeted studies and provide a host of new associations to consider in modeling the effects of diet on the gut microbiome and human health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0066019

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffmann, C., Dollive, S., Grunberg, S., Chen, J., Li, H., Wu, G. D., Lewis, J. D., & Bushman, F. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Gary D.
  • Lewis, James D.
  • Bushman, Frederic D.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-06-17
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
e66019
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110345840
Cited by
808
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 4
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • University of Pennsylvania (UL1 RR024134)
  • National Institutes of Health (and K24, DK050306)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK078228, DK 089472, R01DK089472, UH2/3 DK083981, UH3DK083981, UH2DK083981, P30DK050306)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024134, S10RR024525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
gut microbiota, archaea, fungi, diet, Methanobrevibacter, Candida, Ascomycota, carbohydrate intake, long-term diet, microbial co-occurrence, human health
MeSH terms
Archaea, Bacteria, Diet, Fungi, Humans, Intestines, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review