Cited by 176Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

A deep root for the Cambrian explosion: Implications of new bio- and chemostratigraphy from the Siberian Platform

Open access
Zhu, M., Zhuravlev, A.Yu., Wood, R.A., Zhao, F., Sukhov, S.S.·2017·Geology

Abstract

Much uncertainty remains as to the temporal relationship between the Ediacaran and Cambrian biotas, yet this is critical to our understanding of the rise of metazoans. Here we present new high resolution carbon isotope chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy for a terminal Ediacaran to Cambrian succession on the eastern Siberian Platform, Russia, which shows the presence of a succession of diverse fossil assemblages before the start of the basal Cambrian negative carbon isotope excursion (BACE). Softbodied Ediacaran biota (Beltanelliformis) occur before the start of the late Ediacaran positive carbon isotope plateau (EPIP), a mixed Ediacaran and Cambrian skeletal biota (Cloudina, Anabarities, Cambrotubulus) appear within the EPIP, and diverse Cambrian-type small shelly fossils including Protohertzina and other protocondonts, halkieriids, chancelloriids, hyoliths, hyolithelminthes and the burrowing trace fossil (Diplocraterion) appear at the beginning of the BACE. These integrated data show that taxa attributed to so-called Ediacaran and earliest Cambrian skeletal biotas in fact overlap without notable biotic turnover, and thus refute the presence of a large isotope excursion coincident with mass extinction of all Ediacaran biota. We propose a new biozone, the Cloudina-Namacalathus-Sinotubulites Assemblage Zone, to precede the known small shelly fossil (SSF) zones. These observations raise doubts as to whether there is any true separation between the Ediacaran and Cambrian skeletal biotas, and suggest that there is a deep root for the Cambrian Explosion of metazoans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g38865.1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The worldwide ECN or N1 negative δ13Ccarb excursion, named BACE, is consistent with the first appearance of small shelly fossils of Anabarites trisulcatus zone, which was calibrated as the beginning of Cambrian.

    “The worldwide ECN or N1 negative δ13Ccarb excursion, named the BACE5,45, is consistent with the first appearance of small shelly fossils of Anabarites trisulcatus zone33, which was calibrated as the beginning of Cambrian61.”

    From Enhanced weathering as a trigger for the rise of atmospheric O2 level from the late Ediacaran to the early Cambrian (2019) · cites this paper as [5]

    Citation 61 is attached to the claim that the first appearance of the Anabarites trisulcatus zone was calibrated as the beginning of the Cambrian. The Introduction instead says the first appearance of Treptichnus pedum defines the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. The Discussion also says an Anabarites-bearing assemblage can be interpreted as uppermost Ediacaran, rather than fixing the boundary. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The BACE was followed by the rapid appearance and diversification of bilaterian animals in the early Cambrian.

    “The BACE, on the other hand, was followed by the rapid appearance and diversification of bilaterian animals in the early Cambrian according to a combined study of lithology, fossils and geochemical data5,47.”

    From Enhanced weathering as a trigger for the rise of atmospheric O2 level from the late Ediacaran to the early Cambrian (2019) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Introduction says the BACE was followed by the rapid appearance and diversification of bilaterian animals, but presents this as prior understanding. The paper’s own data and Discussion instead report considerable diversification of Cambrian-type skeletal taxa before the BACE and no notable turnover across it. Thus the claim repeats the introductory account but overstates what the combined study found. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a transitional small shelly fossil biota in SE Siberia.

    “Transitional small shelly fossil biota, SE Siberia (from (6)).”
  • High-resolution carbon isotope chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy for a terminal Ediacaran to Cambrian succession on the eastern Siberian Platform show the presence of a succession of diverse fossil assemblages before the start of the BACE.

    “Secondly, high-resolution carbon isotope chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy for a terminal Ediacaran to Cambrian succession on the eastern Siberian Platform show the presence of a succession of diverse fossil assemblages before the start of the BACE (6).”
  • There is possibly no true separation between Ediacaran and Cambrian skeletal biotas.

    “some authors indicated that the roots of the Cambrian 'Explosion ' lie in the Precambrian, and considered that there is possibly no true separation between Ediacaran and Cambrian skeletal biotas (e.g., Zhu et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]1. Cambrian boundary in Oman: Geology, v. 31, p. 431-434, doi:10.1130/0091- 7613(2003)031<0431:EOCANA>2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  2. [18]18. Wood, R., Zhuravlev, A.Yu., Sukhov, S.S., Zhu, M., and Zhao, F., 2016, Demise of Ediacaran dolomitic seas marks widespread biomineralisation on the Siberian platform: Geology, v. 45, p. 27-30, doi:10.1130/G38367. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, M., Zhuravlev, A. Y., Wood, R. A., Zhao, F., & Sukhov, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology (CN)
  • Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources (RU)
Corresponding author
Zhu, M.
Venue
Geology
Published
2017-03-16
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
459-462
ISSN
  • 0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2682
OpenAlex
W2595726824
Cited by
176
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Geology (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2013CB835006)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (2013CB835006, XDB18030304)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Cambrian explosion, Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary, carbon isotope stratigraphy, biostratigraphy, small shelly fossils, Cloudina, chancelloriids, hyoliths, Diplocraterion, negative carbon isotope excursion, Ediacaran biota, Siberian Platform, biozones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review