The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome: a population-based study in Western Sweden
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Almost all cases of DiGeorge syndrome, velo-cardio-facial syndrome and conotruncal anomaly face syndrome result from a common deletion of chromosome 22q11.2. These syndromes are usually referred to as the 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS), which has a wide phenotypic spectrum and an estimated incidence of one in 4000 births. AIMS: To assess the incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome in the Western Götaland Region of western Sweden METHODS: Children below 16 years of age with 22q11DS in a well defined catchment area and population of the Western Götaland Region were recruited. Diagnosis of 22q11DS was confirmed using a FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridisation) test. Proven 22q11 deletion was the demonstration of one signal in 11 metaphase spreads with fair quality. RESULTS: During the study period in the Western Götaland Region the mean annual incidence of 22q11DS was 14.1 per 100 000 live births. During the first five years the incidence was 18.1 per 100 000 live births for the whole region and 23.4 per 100 000 live births in Gothenburg, where a multidisciplinary specialist team for 22q11 DS is based. The prevalence was 13.2 per 100 000 children below 16 years of age in the whole region and 23.3 per 100 000 in Gothenburg. CONCLUSION: The number of individuals diagnosed depends on the experience and awareness of the syndrome among specialists who encounter these children and also the severity of the phenotype. The higher frequency of 22q11DS found in Gothenburg is an example of increased awareness. The true incidence and prevalence of this syndrome will only be found through population-based screening, but this would be too expensive and ethically questionable. Screening of specific risk populations would be more justified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Sullivan, K. E., Marino, B., Philip, N., Swillen, A., Vorstman, J. A. S., Zackai, E. H., Emanuel, B. S., Vermeesch, J. R., Morrow, B. E., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.71 · Cited by 2,236
Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
Bassett, A. S., McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Devriendt, K., Digilio, M. C., Goldenberg, P., Habel, A., Marino, B., Oskarsdottir, S., Philip, N., Sullivan, K., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.02.039 · Cited by 597
Velo‐cardio‐facial syndrome: 30 Years of study
Shprintzen, R. J. (2008) · Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/ddrr.2 · Cited by 462
De novo rates and selection of large copy number variation
Itsara, A., Wu, H., Smith, J. D., Nickerson, D. A., Romieu, I., London, S. J., & Eichler, E. E. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.107680.110 · Cited by 328
van Amelsvoort, T., Daly, E., Henry, J., Robertson, D., Ng, V., Owen, M., Murphy, K. C., & Murphy, D. G. M. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1085 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Oskarsdottir, S.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-151
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2095406825
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome: a population-based study in Western Sweden. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2003.026880
- The paper
- Oskarsdottir, S. (2004). Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome: a population-based study in Western Sweden. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.026880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.