Cited by 328Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

De novo rates and selection of large copy number variation

Open access
Itsara, Andy, Wu, Hao, Smith, Joshua D., Nickerson, Deborah A., Romieu, Isabelle, London, Stephanie J., Eichler, Evan E.·2010·Genome Research

Abstract

While copy number variation (CNV) is an active area of research, de novo mutation rates within human populations are not well characterized. By focusing on large (>100 kbp) events, we estimate the rate of de novo CNV formation in humans by analyzing 4394 transmissions from human pedigrees with and without neurocognitive disease. We show that a significant limitation in directly measuring genome-wide CNV mutation is accessing DNA derived from primary tissues as opposed to cell lines. We conservatively estimated the genome-wide CNV mutation rate using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays to analyze whole-blood derived DNA from asthmatic trios, a collection in which we observed no elevation in the prevalence of large CNVs. At a resolution of ∼30 kb, nine de novo CNVs were observed from 772 transmissions, corresponding to a mutation rate of μ = 1.2 × 10−2 CNVs per genome per transmission (μ = 6.5 × 10−3 for CNVs >500 kb). Combined with previous estimates of CNV prevalence and assuming a model of mutation-selection balance, we estimate significant purifying selection for large (>500 kb) events at the genome-wide level to be s = 0.16. Supporting this, we identify de novo CNVs in 717 multiplex autism pedigrees from the AGRE collection and observe a fourfold enrichment (P = 1.4 × 10−3) for de novo CNVs in cases of multiplex autism versus unaffected siblings, suggesting that many de novo CNV mutations contribute a subtle, but significant risk for autism. We observe no parental bias in the origin or transmission of CNVs among any of the cohorts studied.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.107680.110

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The over-representation of large de novo CNVs in ASD has been replicated in studies of 60 to 393 simplex trios.

    “The over-representation of large de novo CNVs in ASD has been replicated in studies ranging from 60 to 393 simplex trios (Itsara et al., 2010; Marshall et al., 2008; Pinto et al., 2010)”
  • Subsequent larger studies confirmed a high rate (5-10%) of de novo CNVs in ASD and further clarified the extent of genetic heterogeneity.

    “Subsequent studies in larger samples have confirmed a high (5–10%) rate of de novo CNVs in ASD and further elucidated the extent of genetic heterogeneity in ASD (Itsara et al., 2010; Levy et al., 2011; Marshall et al., 2008; Pinto et al., 2010; Sanders et al., 2011).”

    From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Itsara et al., 2010

  • CNVs larger than 10 kb occur at a rate of about 0.01-0.02 per generation.

    “CNVs >10 Kb in size occur at a rate of ~0.01–0.02 per generation.(Itsara et al., 2010; Levy et al., 2011; Marshall et al., 2008; Sanders et al., 2011; Sebat et al., 2007).”

    From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Itsara et al., 2010

  • The control de novo CNV rate of 0.9% is consistent with previous estimates ranging from 0.5% to 3%.

    “This rate is consistent with estimates from previous studies ranging from 0.5% to 3% (Conrad et al., 2010, Itsara et al., 2010, Levy et al., 2011, Sebat et al., 2007 and Xu et al., 2008).”

    From High frequencies of de novo CNVs in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (2011) · cites this paper as Itsara et al., 2010

  • The size difference between SD-mediated and non-SD-mediated de novo CNVs is consistent with prior studies linking CNV size to mutational mechanism.

    “Notably, the median size of SD and non-SD-mediated de novo CNVs was 722 kb and 67 kb respectively, consistent with previous studies that have found differences in CNV size related to the underlying mutational mechanism (Itsara et al., 2010 and Stefansson et al., 2008).”

    From High frequencies of de novo CNVs in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (2011) · cites this paper as Itsara et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Itsara, A., Wu, H., Smith, J. D., Nickerson, D. A., Romieu, I., London, S. J., & Eichler, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2010-09-14
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1469-1481
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158959870
Cited by
328
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 43
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Autism Speaks
  • Simons Foundation
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (137578)
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (26206-M)
  • National Institutes of Health (26206-M)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U24MH081810)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007266)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (26206-M, ES049019, ES025045, ZIAES049019, ZIAES025045)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
copy number variation, de novo mutations, mutation rate, purifying selection, mutation-selection balance, autism spectrum disorder, human pedigrees, SNP array, parental bias
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asthma, Autistic Disorder, Base Sequence, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Gene Frequency, Humans, Male, Pedigree, Selection, Genetic, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review