Cited by 142Child Nutrition and Water AccessWater Treatment and DisinfectionViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Solar disinfection of water for diarrhoeal prevention in southern India

Open access
Rose, A·2005·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of solar irradiation in the prevention of diarrhoeal morbidity in children under 5 years of age, in an urban slum in Vellore, Tamil Nadu. METHODS: A total of 100 children were assigned to receive drinking water that had been subjected to solar disinfection in polyethylene terephthalate bottles. One hundred age and sex matched controls were also selected. Both groups were followed by weekly home visits for a period of six months for any diarrhoeal morbidity. At the end of the follow up period, the acceptability of the intervention was assessed by interviews, questionnaires, and focus group discussions. RESULTS: There was significant reduction in the incidence, duration, and severity of diarrhoea in children receiving solar disinfected water, despite 86% of the children drinking water other than that treated by the intervention. The incidence of diarrhoea in the intervention group was 1.7 per child-year, and among controls 2.7 per child-year, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.64 (95% CI -0.48 to 0.86). The risk of diarrhoea was reduced by 40% by using solar disinfection. In qualitative evaluation of acceptability, most women felt that solar disinfection was a feasible and sustainable method of disinfecting water. CONCLUSIONS: Solar disinfection of water is an inexpensive, effective, and acceptable method of increasing water safety in a resource limited environment, and can significantly decrease diarrhoeal morbidity in children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2005.077867

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An intervention that provided mothers with treated water was successful in reducing diarrhea in school children by 40% and was considered a feasible solution by the participating mothers.

    “An intervention that provided mothers with treated water was successful in reducing diarrhea in school children by 40% and was considered a feasible solution by the participating mothers (Rose et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, A.
Affiliations
Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN)
Corresponding author
Rose, A
ORCID
Rose, A
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-05-24
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
139-141
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2081069019
Cited by
142
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
solar disinfection, drinking water, diarrhea prevention, children under five, urban slums, water safety, treatment acceptability, resource-limited settings, Vellore
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Consumer Behavior, Developing Countries, Diarrhea, Infantile, Disinfection, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, India, Infant, Poverty Areas, Sunlight, Water Microbiology, Water Supply, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review