Cited by 564Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data

Open access
Reilly, J J, Penpraze, V, Hislop, J, Davies, G, Grant, S, Paton, J Y·2008·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

Objective methods are being used increasingly for the quantification of the amount of physical activity, intensity of physical activity and amount of sedentary behaviour in children. The accelerometer is currently the objective method of choice. In this review we address the advantages of objective measurement compared with more traditional subjective methods, notably the avoidance of bias, greater confidence in the amount of activity and sedentary behaviour measured, and improved ability to relate variation in physical activity and sedentary behaviour to variation in health outcomes. We also consider unresolved practical issues in paediatric accelerometry by critically reviewing the existing evidence and by providing new evidence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2007.133272

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reilly, J. J., Penpraze, V, Hislop, J., Davies, G., Grant, S., & Paton, J. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Queen Margaret University (GB)
Corresponding author
Reilly, J J
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
93
Issue
7
Pages
614-619
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2167776023
Cited by
564
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 58
FWCI
27.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical activity measurement, sedentary behavior, accelerometry, children, objective measurement, physical activity intensity, measurement bias, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Child, Child Behavior, Health Status, Humans, Life Style, Motor Activity, Health Behavior, Exercise, Ergometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review