The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence: Figure 1
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The electronic medical record (EMR)/electronic health record (EHR) is becoming an integral component of many primary-care outpatient practices. Before implementing an EMR/EHR system, primary-care practices should have an understanding of the potential benefits and limitations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically review the recent literature around the impact of the EMR/EHR within primary-care outpatient practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searches of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, ABI Inform, and Cochrane Library were conducted to identify articles published between January 1998 and January 2010. The gray literature and reference lists of included articles were also searched. 30 studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The EMR/EHR appears to have structural and process benefits, but the impact on clinical outcomes is less clear. Using Donabedian's framework, five articles focused on the impact on healthcare structure, 21 explored healthcare process issues, and four focused on health-related outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care
Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., Bardon, C. G., Spurr, C. D., Carchidi, P. J., Kittler, A. F., Goldszer, R. C., Fairchild, D. G., Sussman, A. J., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00057-3 · Cited by 740
Electronic Health Record Use and the Quality of Ambulatory Care in the United States
Linder, J. A., Ma, J., Bates, D. W., Middleton, B., & Stafford, R. S. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.13.1400 · Cited by 438
The Relationship between Electronic Health Record Use and Quality of Care over Time
Zhou, L., Soran, C. S., Jenter, C. A., Volk, L. A., Orav, E. J., Bates, D. W., & Simon, S. R. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m3128 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Improving Diagnostic Accuracy and Achieving Precision Medicine
Castaneda, C., Nalley, K., Mannion, C., Bhattacharyya, P., Blake, P., Pecora, A., Goy, A., & Suh, K. S. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s13336-015-0019-3 · Cited by 408
Clinical Benefits of Electronic Health Record Use: National Findings
King, J., Patel, V., Jamoom, E. W., & Furukawa, M. F. (2014) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12135 · Cited by 273
Gidwani, R., Nguyen, C., Kofoed, A., Carragee, C., Rydel, T., Nelligan, I., Sattler, A., Mahoney, M., & Lin, S. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2122 · Cited by 202
The Use of Medical Scribes in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Future Directions
Shultz, C. G., & Holmstrom, H. L. (2015) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140224 · Cited by 139
Association of medical scribes in primary care with physician workflow and patient experience
Mishra, P., Kiang, J. C., & Grant, R. W. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3956 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Lorenzetti, D., Straus, S. E., Sykes, L., & Quan, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 732-737
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W2171004512
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence: Figure 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000019
- The paper
- Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Lorenzetti, D., Straus, S. E., Sykes, L., & Quan, H. (2011). The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence: Figure 1. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
