Cited by 136Electronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Association of medical scribes in primary care with physician workflow and patient experience

Open access
Mishra, Pranita, Kiang, Jacqueline C., Grant, Richard W.·2018·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in medical care has resulted in increased physician documentation workload and decreased interaction with patients. Despite the increasing use of medical scribes for EHR documentation assistance, few methodologically rigorous studies have examined the use of medical scribes in primary care. Objective: To evaluate the association of use of medical scribes with primary care physician (PCP) workflow and patient experience. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 12-month crossover study with 2 sequences and 4 periods was conducted from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017, in 2 medical center facilities within an integrated health care system and included 18 of 24 eligible PCPs. Interventions: The PCPs were randomly assigned to start the first 3-month period with or without scribes and then alternated exposure status every 3 months for 1 year, thereby serving as their own controls. The PCPs completed a 6-question survey at the end of each study period. Patients of participating PCPs were surveyed after scribed clinic visits. Main Outcomes and Measures: PCP-reported perceptions of documentation burden and visit interactions, objective measures of time spent on EHR activity and required for closing encounters, and patient-reported perceptions of visit quality. Results: Of the 18 participating PCPs, 10 were women, 12 were internal medicine physicians, and 6 were family practice physicians. The PCPs graduated from medical school a mean (SD) of 13.7 (6.5) years before the study start date. Compared with nonscribed periods, scribed periods were associated with less self-reported after-hours EHR documentation (<1 hour daily during week: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 18.0 [95% CI, 4.7-69.0]; <1 hour daily during weekend: aOR, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.7-28.7). Scribed periods were also associated with higher likelihood of PCP-reported spending more than 75% of the visit interacting with the patient (aOR, 295.0; 95% CI, 19.7 to >900) and less than 25% of the visit on a computer (aOR, 31.5; 95% CI, 7.3-136.4). Encounter documentation was more likely to be completed by the end of the next business day during scribed periods (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-7.1). A total of 450 of 735 patients (61.2%) reported that scribes had a positive bearing on their visits; only 2.4% reported a negative bearing. Conclusions and Relevance: Medical scribes were associated with decreased physician EHR documentation burden, improved work efficiency, and improved visit interactions. Our results support the use of medical scribes as one strategy for improving physician workflow and visit quality in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3956

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Documentation burden associated with electronic health records is linked to clinician burnout among physicians and nurses.

    “Electronic health records (EHRs) are linked with documentation burden resulting in clinician burnout.”

    From Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The paper’s introduction, labeled Abstract in our copy, says EHRs increase clerical workload and physician stress and that EHR-created documentation burden contributes to physician burnout. The Discussion likewise identifies EHR documentation burden as a contributor to burnout. These passages support the citing sentence as printed, but the supplied paraphrase extends the claim to nurses, whom the passages do not address. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Research shows shortage of more than 100,000 doctors by 2030 [press release]. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; March 14, 2017.
  2. Pekham C. Medscape lifestyle report 2016: bias and burnout. Appl Clin Inform. 2018;09(01): 011-014. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1620263 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, P., Kiang, J. C., & Grant, R. W.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Mishra, Pranita
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
178
Issue
11
Pages
1467
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890157215
Cited by
136
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK109114)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
medical scribes, electronic health records, patient experience, physician-patient interaction, integrated health system, crossover design, patient satisfaction, patient-physician communication, physician-patient relationship, physician burnout, physician well-being
MeSH terms
Documentation, Humans, Primary Health Care, Patient Satisfaction, Efficiency, Organizational, Workflow, Electronic Health Records, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review