Cited by 509Electronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System

Open access
Friedman, Charles, Rubin, Joshua, Brown, Jeffrey, Buntin, Melinda, Corn, Milton, Etheredge, Lynn, Gunter, Carl, Musen, Mark +4 more·2015·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective The capability to share data, and harness its potential to generate knowledge rapidly and inform decisions, can have transformative effects that improve health. The infrastructure to achieve this goal at scale—marrying technology, process, and policy—is commonly referred to as the Learning Health System (LHS). Achieving an LHS raises numerous scientific challenges. Materials and methods The National Science Foundation convened an invitational workshop to identify the fundamental scientific and engineering research challenges to achieving a national-scale LHS. The workshop was planned by a 12-member committee and ultimately engaged 45 prominent researchers spanning multiple disciplines over 2 days in Washington, DC on 11–12 April 2013. Results The workshop participants collectively identified 106 research questions organized around four system-level requirements that a high-functioning LHS must satisfy. The workshop participants also identified a new cross-disciplinary integrative science of cyber-social ecosystems that will be required to address these challenges. Conclusions The intellectual merit and potential broad impacts of the innovations that will be driven by investments in an LHS are of great potential significance. The specific research questions that emerged from the workshop, alongside the potential for diverse communities to assemble to address them through a ‘new science of learning systems’, create an important agenda for informatics and related disciplines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002977

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]Tapscott D Williams A Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything, expanded edition New York, NY: The Penguin Group, 2008: 1– 351.
  2. [24]Norton L Creating infrastructure for big data in the public and private sectors. Presented at ECRI Institute Annual Conference: Data BIG and Small: What Healthcare Decision Makers are Using Now; November 2013 https://www.ecri.org/Video/2013_TA_Conf/4-Session-1-Norton.mov
  3. [27]Health Affairs. Using big data to transform care. July 2014: Volume 33, Issue 7. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/33/7.toc
  4. [38]Summit D at the M. 2012L. H. S. (2012). Core Values Underlying a National-Scale Person-Centered Continuous Learning Health System (LHS) (pp. 1–2). http://www.learninghealth.org/corevalues/
  5. [46]National Research Council. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. 22536618

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, C., Rubin, J., Brown, J., Buntin, M., Corn, M., Etheredge, L., Gunter, C., Musen, M., Platt, R., Stead, W., Sullivan, K., & Van Houweling, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • United States National Library of Medicine (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Corresponding author
Friedman, Charles
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2014-10-23
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
43-50
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2097974960
Cited by
509
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 10
FWCI
51.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1249354)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
learning health systems, research agenda, health data sharing, health data infrastructure, health informatics, research challenges, health decision-making, system-level requirements, interdisciplinary research
MeSH terms
Information Systems, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Computer Security, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Databases as Topic, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review