Cited by 61Social Media in Health EducationAcademic Publishing and Open AccessMedia and Digital Communication

Social media use among young rheumatologists and basic scientists: results of an international survey by the Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET)

Open access
Nikiphorou, Elena, Studenic, Paul, Ammitzbøll, Christian Gytz, Canavan, Mary, Jani, Meghna, Ospelt, Caroline, Berenbaum, Francis·2017·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objectives To explore perceptions, barriers and patterns of social media (SM) use among rheumatology fellows and basic scientists.Methods An online survey was disseminated via Twitter, Facebook and by email to members of the Emerging European League Against Rheumatism Network. Questions focused on general demographics, frequency and types of SM use, reasons and barriers to SM use.Results Of 233 respondents (47 countries), 72% were aged 30-39 years, 66% female. 83% were active users of at least one SM platform and 71% were using SM professionally. The majority used SM for communicating with friends/colleagues (79%), news updates (76%), entertainment (69%), clinical (50%) and research (48%) updates. Facebook was the dominant platform used (91%). SM was reported to be used for information (81%); for expanding professional networks (76%); new resources (59%); learning new skills (47%) and establishing a professional online presence (46%). 30% of non-SM users justified not using SM due to lack of knowledge.Conclusions There was a substantial use of SM by rheumatologists and basic scientists for social and professional reasons. The survey highlights a need for providing learning resources and increasing awareness of the use of SM. This could enhance communication, participation and collaborative work, enabling its more widespread use in a professional manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209718

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikiphorou, E., Studenic, P., Ammitzbøll, C. G., Canavan, M., Jani, M., Ospelt, C., & Berenbaum, F.
Affiliations
  • Whittington Hospital (GB)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Nikiphorou, Elena
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
712-715
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538806826
Cited by
61
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media use, rheumatologists, basic scientists, professional networking, barriers to social media use, Facebook, EULAR, professional communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Fellowships and Scholarships, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rheumatology, Biomedical Research, Information Seeking Behavior, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review