Cited by 230Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis persists after immunotherapy cessation

Open access
Braaten, Tawnie J, Brahmer, Julie R, Forde, Patrick M, Le, Dung, Lipson, Evan J, Naidoo, Jarushka, Schollenberger, Megan, Zheng, Lei +3 more·2020·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objective We sought to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who develop immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced inflammatory arthritis (IA), to define factors associated with IA persistence after ICI cessation, the need for immunosuppressants and the impact of these medications on underlying malignancies.Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of patients referred for IA associated with ICIs. Patients were recruited from June 2015 to December 2018. Information was obtained at the baseline visit, and follow-up visits occurred at varying intervals for up to 24 months from ICI cessation. Kaplan-Meier curves were developed to characterise IA persistence. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the influence of various factors on IA persistence. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of IA treatment on tumour response.Results Sixty patients were monitored with a median follow-up after ICI cessation of 9 months. A majority (53.3%) had active IA at their most recent follow-up. IA was less likely to improve in those with longer duration of ICI use, in those receiving combination ICI therapy, and in patients with multiple other immune-related adverse events. Tumour response did not appear to be impacted by immunosuppression. Although not statistically significant, persistent IA was correlated with a better tumour response (complete or partial response).Conclusion ICI-induced IA can become a long-term disease necessitating management by rheumatology for immunomodulatory treatment. Importantly, the use of immunomodulatory treatment has not been shown to impact cancer outcomes in this study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216109

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease may have somewhat higher risk of irAEs, usually low-grade flares of their pre-existing disease rather than de novo events.

    “Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease may have somewhat higher risk of irAEs, although these usually relate to increased risks of low-grade flares of their pre-existing disease rather than de novo events.30–32”

    From Endocrine toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Giles CR, Barron C, McWhirter E. Persistent immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. poster presentation CAMO 2019 annual scientific meeting, 2019 available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332929394_Persistent_immune-related_adverse_events_after_immune_checkpoint_inhibitor_therapy [ accessed 8/19/2019].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braaten, T. J., Brahmer, J. R., Forde, P. M., Le, D., Lipson, E. J., Naidoo, J., Schollenberger, M., Zheng, L., Bingham, C. O., Shah, A. A., & Cappelli, L. C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Cappelli, Laura C
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
332-338
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974173963
Cited by
230
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Passano Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute (P30-AR070354)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30-AR070354, R01AR073208, T32-AR048522)
  • Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
  • Barney Family Foundation
  • Jerome L. Greene Foundation (Scholar Award)
  • Moving for Melanoma of Delaware
  • AbbVie
  • The Laverna Hahn Charitable Trust
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune-related adverse events, long-term outcomes, immunosuppressive therapy, tumor response, combination immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Aged, Arthritis, Female, Humans, Immunologic Factors, Immunotherapy, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review