The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available; none of the 30 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Immunogenicity and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and in the general population: a multicentre study
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Vaccination represents a cornerstone in mastering the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on immunogenicity and safety of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) are limited. Methods A multicentre observational study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of the two-dose regimen BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in adult patients with AIIRD (n=686) compared with the general population (n=121). Serum IgG antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1/S2 proteins were measured 2-6 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG ≥15 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL. Vaccination efficacy, safety, and disease activity were assessed within 6 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Results Following vaccination, the seropositivity rate and S1/S2 IgG levels were significantly lower among patients with AIIRD versus controls (86% (n=590) vs 100%, p<0.0001 and 132.9±91.7 vs 218.6±82.06 BAU/mL, p<0.0001, respectively). Risk factors for reduced immunogenicity included older age and treatment with glucocorticoids, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and abatacept. Rituximab was the main cause of a seronegative response (39% seropositivity). There were no postvaccination symptomatic cases of COVID-19 among patients with AIIRD and one mild case in the control group. Major adverse events in patients with AIIRD included death (n=2) several weeks after the second vaccine dose, non-disseminated herpes zoster (n=6), uveitis (n=2), and pericarditis (n=1). Postvaccination disease activity remained stable in the majority of patients. Conclusion mRNA BNTb262 vaccine was immunogenic in the majority of patients with AIIRD, with an acceptable safety profile. Treatment with glucocorticoids, rituximab, MMF, and abatacept was associated with a significantly reduced BNT162b2-induced immunogenicity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Combining TNFi with MTX lowered seropositivity to 93% (p=0.04).
“The combination of TNFi with MTX reduced the rate of seropositivity to 93% (p=0.04).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
JAK inhibitors showed a minor, non-significant negative effect on BNTb262-induced antibody production.
“JAKi, representing a smaller fraction of treatments in our study, demonstrated a minor non-significantly negative effect on the production of BNTb262-induced antibodies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Postvaccination disease activity indices remained stable in RA, PsA, axSpA, and SLE patients.
“In patients with RA, PsA, axSpA and SLE, the postvaccination indices of disease activity remained stable (figure 2).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Postvaccination disease activity remained stable in the majority of patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Glucocorticoid, MMF, and abatacept use was significantly associated with absence of humoral response.
“GC, MMF, and abatacept was significantly associated with a lack of humoral response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The lowest seropositivity rate, below 40%, occurred in AAV and IIM patients.
“In patients with RA, the seropositive rate was 82.1%, whereas the lowest seropositive rate (<40%) was observed in patients with AAV and IIM (table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Mean S1/S2 IgG levels after the second dose were lower in AIIRD patients than controls (132.9±91.7 vs 218.6±82.06 BAU/mL, p<0.0001).
“The level of the S1/S2 antibodies was significantly reduced in patients with AIIRD compared with controls (mean±SD, 132.9±91.7 vs 218.6±82.06;p<0.0001).”
- Also stated in: § Patient and public involvement · plain
“Serum anti-S1/ S2 IgG titre, mean±SD, BAU/mL Controls, n=121 121 (100) 218.6±82.06Patients with AIIRD, n=686 590 (86.0)* 132.9±91.7*”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The control group, composed mainly of healthcare personnel, is representative of the general population for assessing vaccine immunogenicity.
- Also stated in: § Patient and public involvement · plain
- Findingown data
The interval between prior rituximab administration and BNT162b2 vaccination significantly affected vaccine immunogenicity.
“The time interval between the prevaccination administration of rituximab and the BNT162b2 vaccination had a significant impact on the vaccine's immunogenicity, as shown in figure 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among AIIRD subgroups, seropositivity exceeded 90% for PsA, axSpA, SLE, and LVV.
“In patients with PsA, axSpA, SLE and LVV, the seropositive rate was above 90%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No serious or major adverse events occurred in the control group.
“There were no serious or major adverse events in the control group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mild adverse event prevalence was similar between AIIRD patients and controls.
“The prevalence of mild adverse events was similar in patients with AIIRD and controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
95.2% of AIIRD patients were receiving immunomodulatory medications.
“A total of 95.2% (n=653) of patients with AIIRD were treated with immunomodulatory medications (table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Multivariate regression adjusted for age, AIIRD diagnosis, MTX, and anti-CD20 confirmed these associations.
“Multivariate regression analysis (using PsA, the largest subgroup with the highest seropositivity, as a reference) accounting for age, AIIRD diagnosis, and treatment with MTX and anti-CD20 confirmed these associations (table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The seropositivity rate in RA patients was 82.1%.
“In patients with RA, the seropositive rate was 82.1%, whereas the lowest seropositive rate (<40%) was observed in patients with AAV and IIM (table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The seropositivity rate among AIIRD patients treated with GC was 66%.
“The seropositivity rate of patients with AIIRD treated with GC was only 66%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effects of GC, MMF, anti-CD20, and abatacept on immunogenicity were independent of concomitant other DMARDs.
“The impact of GC, MMF, anti-CD20 and abatacept on immunogenicity was independent from the concomitant use of other DMARDs (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Anticytokine biologics including TNFi, IL17i, and IL6i did not interfere with BNTb262-induced antibody production.
“Importantly, anticytokine biologics including TNFi, IL17i and IL6i did not interfere with the production of BNTb262-induced antibodies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two AIIRD patients died after the second vaccine dose.
“Two patients with AIIRD died after the second vaccine dose.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Major adverse events in patients with AIIRD included death (n=2) several weeks after the second vaccine dose, non-disseminated herpes zoster (n=6), uveitis (n=2), and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Over 97% of patients receiving anticytokine monotherapy (TNFi, IL-17i, or IL-6i) mounted an appropriate immunogenic response.
“More than 97% of patients treated with anticytokine therapies, including tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL-17i) and interleukin 6 inhibitors (IL-6i), had an appropriate immunogenic response when used as monotherapy (table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
No causal relationship could be established between the two deaths among AIIRD patients and vaccination.
“No causal link between the two deaths of the patients with AIIRD and vaccination could be established.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Among the AIIRD, rheumatoid arthritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies were linked to a low humoral response to the vaccine.
“From the standpoint of particular AIIRD at risk of low immunogenic response to vaccine, RA, AAV and IIM were associated with a low humoral response to the vaccine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant disease flares were observed across the different AIIRD.
“There was no evidence of significant disease flares across different AIIRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three other herpes zoster patients had low-level immunosuppression.
“Two patients were treated with JAKi and one with rituximab and MMF, indicating a baseline increased risk for HZ, whereas three others had a low level of immunosuppression, calling for a potential causal link between the events.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
GC, rituximab, abatacept combined with MTX, and MMF were associated with significantly reduced vaccine-induced immunogenicity.
“Treatment with GC, rituximab, abatacept in combination with MTX, and MMF was associated with significantly decreased vaccine-induced immunogenicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Six AIIRD patients developed herpes zoster.
“Occurrence of HZ in six patients with AIIRD merits a special attention as reported by our group.15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Furer V, Zisman D, Kibari A,. Herpes zoster following BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a case series. Rheumatology.
- Premisecitation
Encouraging mRNA vaccination data in immunosuppressed patients came from two small studies with limited follow-up.
“Recently, some encouraging data on mRNA vaccination in immunosuppressed patients have emerged based on two small studies with a limited follow-up.[4][5][6]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4][5][6]
- Study design and conductown data
This study lacked data on B-cell repopulation at the time of vaccination for patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy.
“Neither data on B-cell repopulation at the time of vaccination for patients under anti-CD20 therapy nor data on cellular immunity were available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Solid organ transplant recipients on MMF-containing regimens were at risk of a negative humoral response to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.
“Consistently, solid organ transplant recipients treated with regimens including MMF were at risk of a negative humoral response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine.43 44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] Grupper, 2021, Reduced humoral response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients without prior exposure to the virus, Am J Transplant
- cites [44] Peled, 2021, BNT162b2 vaccination in heart transplant recipients: clinical experience and antibody response, J Heart Lung Transplant source
- Interpretationown data
Treatment with glucocorticoids, rituximab, MMF, or abatacept was associated with significantly reduced BNT162b2-induced immunogenicity.
“Treatment with glucocorticoids, rituximab, MMF, and abatacept was associated with a significantly reduced BNT162b2-induced immunogenicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
This study lacked data on cellular immunity.
“Neither data on B-cell repopulation at the time of vaccination for patients under anti-CD20 therapy nor data on cellular immunity were available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In that study, B-cell depletion was linked to absence of serological response, based on data from 11 patients.
“B-cell depletion was associated with a lack of serological response, based on data available for 11 patients.39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Spiera, 2021, Rituximab, but not other antirheumatic therapies, is associated with impaired serological response to SARS- CoV-2 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases, Ann Rheum Dis source
- Premisecitation
RA patients treated with baricitinib achieved a considerable pneumococcal humoral response.
“A considerable pneumococcal humoral response was achieved in patients with RA treated with baricitinib.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Winthrop, 2019, Evaluation of pneumococcal and tetanus vaccine responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving baricitinib: results from a long-term extension trial substudy, Arthritis Res Ther source
- Interpretationown data
The lower antibody levels in AIIRD patients raise concern about long-term vaccine protection.
“raising concerns about the long-term protection of the vaccine in patients with AIIRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Protection against SARS-CoV-2 depends on both humoral and T-cell-mediated immunity.
“As protection from SARS-CoV-2 relies on both humoral and T-cell-mediated immunity, 40 41”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Patients with a poor humoral response might still be protected by T-cell-mediated immunity.
“patients with a deficient humoral response may be still protected by the latter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A retrospective study of 30 rheumatic disease patients on rituximab found that only 10 (33.3%) mounted a serological response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
“In a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with rheumatic diseases treated with rituximab, only 10 patients (33.3%) developed a serological response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Spiera, 2021, Rituximab, but not other antirheumatic therapies, is associated with impaired serological response to SARS- CoV-2 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases, Ann Rheum Dis source
- Interpretationcitation
The herpes zoster events raise the possibility of a causal link with vaccination.
“Two patients were treated with JAKi and one with rituximab and MMF, indicating a baseline increased risk for HZ, whereas three others had a low level of immunosuppression, calling for a potential causal link between the events.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Furer V, Zisman D, Kibari A,. Herpes zoster following BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a case series. Rheumatology.
- Interpretationown data
The study's results do not support withholding MTX and JAK inhibitors before COVID-19 vaccination, contrary to ACR recommendations.
“The results of our study do not support withholding MTX and JAKi in relation to COVID-19 vaccination as recommended by the ACR. 3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Force D,. COVID-19 vaccine clinical guidance summary for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.
- Interpretationown data
This association appears to be at least partly due to the treatments used.
“This finding seems to be at least partially explained by the underlying treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This treatment pattern suggests a baseline increased risk for herpes zoster.
“Two patients were treated with JAKi and one with rituximab and MMF, indicating a baseline increased risk for HZ, whereas three others had a low level of immunosuppression, calling for a potential causal link between the events.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Long-term follow-up data were absent.
“The limitations of our study include a non-randomised design, a lack of matching between patients and controls by age, and the absence of long-term follow-up data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAnti-CD20 therapies, mainly rituximab, significantly reduced vaccine-induced humoral response, with seropositivity of 41.3% as monotherapy and 36% with MTX.
“Treatment with anti-CD20 therapies, mainly represented by rituximab in this study, significantly reduced vaccineinduced humoral response, with seropositivity of 41.3% when administered as monotherapy and 36% when administered in combination with MTX.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAdverse events of special interest in AIIRD included uveitis (n=2), herpes labialis (n=1), pericarditis (n=1), and non-disseminated herpes zoster in five patients after dose one and one after dose two.
“Adverse events of special interest in patients with AIIRD included uveitis (n=2), herpes labialis (n=1), pericarditis (n=1), and non-disseminated herpes zoster (HZ) 15 in five patients after the first vaccine dose and in one patient after the second vaccine dose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn this study, abatacept treatment lowered the humoral response to vaccination, with seropositivity of 71% as monotherapy and 40% when combined with MTX.
“Treatment with abatacept reduced vaccine-induced humoral response, with a seropositive rate of 71% as monotherapy, reduced to 40% when combined with MTX.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn univariate logistic regression, age over 65, RA, IIM, or AAV diagnosis, and treatment with GC, MMF, anti-CD20, or abatacept were associated with lack of humoral response.
“In the univariate logistic regression model (table 5), age >65 years,diagnosis of RA, IIM, and AAV and treatment with GC, MMF, and anti-CD20, and abatacept were associated with a lack of humoral response to vaccination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataNo symptomatic COVID-19 occurred among AIIRD patients during follow-up, while one control developed mild COVID-19 after the second dose.
“There were no COVID-19 symptomatic disease among AIIRD patients during the study follow-up, whereas one subject in the control group was diagnosed with mild COVID-19 after the second vaccine dose.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“There were no postvaccination symptomatic cases of COVID-19 among patients with AIIRD and one mild case in the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The methods used to ascertain COVID-19 (participant questioning and medical file review) detected all symptomatic infections during follow-up.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSeropositivity was under 20% when vaccination occurred within 6 months after rituximab, rising to about 50% at 1 year after rituximab.
“The seropositivity rate in patients vaccinated within 6 months after rituximab treatment was below 20% but increased to about 50% in patients vaccinated 1 year after rituximab treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMTX as monotherapy or in combination was associated with significantly reduced seropositivity (92% and 84%, respectively), though less than anti-CD20, MMF, or abatacept.
“Seropositivity rate in patients treated with MTX monotherapy and in combination with other treatments was significantly reduced (92% and 84%, respectively), although at a lesser magnitude than with anti-CD20, MMF, and abatacept treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn this study, MMF treatment reduced humoral response, with a seropositivity rate of 64% among 28 patients.
“Treatment with MMF reduced humoral response to a seropositivity rate of 64% in 28 patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAnti-CD20 therapy markedly reduced vaccine immunogenicity, with the lowest seropositivity rate at 39%.
“Anti-CD20 significantly impaired vaccine's immunogenicity, with the lowest seropositivity rate of 39%.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Rituximab was the main cause of a seronegative response (39% seropositivity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAfter two BNT162b2 doses, the seropositivity rate was 86% in AIIRD patients versus 100% in controls, a significant difference (p<0.0001).
“Following vaccination, the seropositivity rate and S1/S2 IgG levels were significantly lower among patients with AIIRD versus controls (86% (n=590) vs 100%, p<0.0001 and 132.9±91.7 vs 218.6±82.06BAU/mL, p<0.0001, respectively).”
- Also stated in: § Immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 vaccine · plain
“The seropositivity rate was 86% (n=590) in patients with AIIRD compared with 100% in controls (p<0.0001).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“with a seropositivity rate of 86% vs 100%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The control group, composed mainly of healthcare personnel, is representative of the general population for assessing vaccine immunogenicity.
- Also stated in: § Immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 vaccine · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn this study, the BNT162b2 vaccine showed a good safety profile, with most adverse events being transient and mild, and overall good tolerance in adult AIIRD patients.
“Regarding the safety of vaccination, our study provides a reassurance for a good safety profile of the vaccine, with most adverse events being transient and mild, consistent with two other studies.4 6”
- Also stated in: § Epidemiology · boosted
“Importantly, this study provides evidence of overall good tolerance of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in adult patients with AIIRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Epidemiology · boosted
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAmong the herpes zoster patients, two were on JAK inhibitors and one was on rituximab plus MMF.
“Two patients were treated with JAKi and one with rituximab and MMF, indicating a baseline increased risk for HZ, whereas three others had a low level of immunosuppression, calling for a potential causal link between the events.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe AIIRD patients who developed herpes zoster were women aged 36-61 years (mean 49±11) with mild or stable rheumatic disease.
“In this study, the affected patients were women within the age range of 36-61 years (mean, 49±11 years) with a mild or stable rheumatic disease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe study population's mean GC dose was relatively low (6.2 mg/day), preventing analysis of a dose-dependent GC effect on vaccination response.
“The mean GC dose in our study population was relatively low (6.2 mg/day), precluding analysis on the dose-dependent effect of GC on vaccination response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFor rheumatoid arthritis patients on rituximab, the amount of B-cell recovery when vaccinated is linked to the strength of the humoral response, a pattern also seen with influenza vaccine.
“The degree of B-cell recovery at the time of vaccination correlated with the extent of the humoral response to vaccination, as reported for influenza vaccine in patients with RA treated with rituximab.38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Eisenberg, 2013, Rituximab-treated patients have a poor response to influenza vaccination, J Clin Immunol source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn RA patients, tofacitinib produced a considerable influenza vaccine response but an impaired pneumococcal vaccine response, especially with MTX.
“Limited data regarding other vaccines have shown that patients with RA treated with tofacitinib achieved a considerable response to influenza vaccine but an impaired response to a pneumococcal vaccine, especially when combined with MTX.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Winthrop, 2016, The effect of tofacitinib on pneumococcal and influenza vaccine responses in rheumatoid arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis source
Probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe final analysis included 686 AIIRD patients and 121 controls after excluding missing serology tests.
“The final analysis included 686 patients with AIIRD and 121 controls due to missing serology tests (table 1; online supplemental figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationMTX may reduce humoral response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in RA patients.
“MTX may reduce humoral response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in patients with RA .[17][18][19][20]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17][18][19][20]
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPrior findings on how abatacept affects other vaccination-related immunity are inconsistent.
“Previous data regarding the impact of abatacept on other vaccination-related immunity are conflicting.29 42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Crnkic Kapetanovic, 2013, Rituximab and abatacept but not tocilizumab impair antibody response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Res Ther source
- cites [42] Alten, 2016, Antibody response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving abatacept, BMC Musculoskelet Disord source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenConfidence intervals were not adjusted for multiplicity, and inferences may not be reproducible.
“The widths of the intervals have not been adjusted for multiplicity, and the inferences drawn from inferences may not be reproducible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductcitationThe LIAISON assay has clinical sensitivity and specificity above 98%.
“This Food and Drug Administration-authorised assay has a clinical sensitivity and specificity above 98%.14”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Criscuolo, 2021, Weak correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity in sera from SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects, J Med Virol source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationA prednisone dose of at least 10 mg/day was associated with reduced humoral response to pneumococcal vaccine in patients with inflammatory diseases.
“A dose of ≥10 mg/day was associated with a reduced vaccine-induced humoral response to pneumococcal vaccine in patients with various inflammatory diseases.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Fischer, 2015, Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in adults undergoing immunosuppressive treatment for inflammatory diseases–a longitudinal study, Arthritis Res Ther source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe BNT162b2 vaccine was immunogenic in most AIIRD patients and had an acceptable safety profile.
“mRNA BNTb262 vaccine was immunogenic in the majority of patients with AIIRD, with an acceptable safety profile.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“demonstrating that BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was immunogenic in the majority of patients with AIIRD compared with controls”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The control group, composed mainly of healthcare personnel, is representative of the general population for assessing vaccine immunogenicity.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationStopping MTX for 2 weeks after influenza vaccination improved immunogenicity in RA patients.
“Temporary discontinuation of MTX for 2 weeks after vaccination improved the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in patients with RA.21 22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] Park, 2017, Effect of methotrexate discontinuation on efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial, Ann Rheum Dis source
- cites [22] Park, 2018, Impact of temporary methotrexate discontinuation for 2 weeks on immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial, Ann Rheum Dis source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataAIIRD patients were significantly older than controls (mean 56.76 vs 50.76 years, p<0.0001).
“Patients with AIIRD included a subgroup of elderly patients aged ≥65 years (32.8%,n=225) and were significantly older than controls, mean age±SD 56.76±14.88vs 50.76±14.68,respectively; p<0.0001.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBNT162b2 has shown high efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.
“BNT162b2, a messenger RNA (mRNA)-based vaccine, has demonstrated a high efficacy rate with an acceptable safety profile. 1 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPrior data show anti-CD20 therapy negatively impacts humoral response to various vaccines, though seroprotection can still occur in rituximab- and ocrelizumab-treated patients.
“Our findings are in line with the previously published data regarding the negative impact of anti-CD20 therapy on the humoral response to various vaccines, although seroprotection could be still achieved after vaccination in rituximab-treated 20 26 34-36 and ocrelizumab-treated 37 patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [20] Hua, 2014, Effect of methotrexate, anti-tumor necrosis factor α, and rituximab on the immune response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Arthritis Care Res source
- cites [26] Rondaan, 2019, Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review for the 2019 update of EULAR recommendations, RMD Open source
- cites [34] Bingham, 2010, Immunization responses in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with rituximab: results from a controlled clinical trial, Arthritis Rheum source
- cites [35] van Assen, 2010, Humoral responses after influenza vaccination are severely reduced in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab, Arthritis Rheum source
- cites [36] Westra, 2014, Rituximab impairs immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG (subclass) responses after influenza vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis patients, Clin Exp Immunol source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataImmunomodulatory drug changes occurred in 3% of patients after the first dose and 4.04% after the second dose.
“During the study period, changes in immunomodulatory drugs after the first vaccine dose were reported in 3% (n=20) of patients and after the second vaccine dose in 4.04% (n=27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Interpretationown dataTherefore, the timing of vaccination is critical in these cases.
“Therefore, timing of vaccination has a critical role in these cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningA lack of humoral response does not rule out T-cell-mediated vaccine-induced immunity.
“Yet, the absence of a humoral response does not preclude T-cell-mediated vaccine-induced immunity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCase reports have recently described herpes zoster after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in individuals without immunosuppression and in one AAV patient in remission.
“Case reports on HZ following the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in subjects without immunosuppressive treatment 45 46 and in one patient with AAV in remission 47 were recently published.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [45] Rodríguez-Jiménez, 2021, Varicella-Zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases, JAAD Case Rep source
- cites [46] Bostan, 2021, Herpes zoster following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a coexistence or coincidence?, J Cosmet Dermatol source
- cites [47] Eid, 2021, Herpes zoster emergence following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, J Med Virol source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committees of the three participating medical centres.
“The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the research ethics committees of the three medical centres: TLV-1055-20, CMC-0238-20 and HMO-0025-21, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataMost immunosuppressive treatments, including csDMARDs, anticytokine biologics and JAK inhibitors, can be continued safely without significantly reducing vaccine-induced immunogenicity.
“Most immunosuppressive treatments, including csDMARDs, anticytokine biologics and JAKi, can be safely continued without significantly attenuating vaccine-induced immunogenicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants provided informed consent at recruitment.
“The participants signed an informed consent on recruitment into the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe disease activity assessment was exploratory and used variable pre- and post-vaccination time frames.
“Yet, this should be interpreted with a certain caution due to an exploratory analysis of disease activity assessment performed within a variable prevaccination and postvaccination time frame.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataPatients and controls were not matched by age.
“The limitations of our study include a non-randomised design, a lack of matching between patients and controls by age, and the absence of long-term follow-up data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataThe study was non-randomised.
“The limitations of our study include a non-randomised design, a lack of matching between patients and controls by age, and the absence of long-term follow-up data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Missing serology data are missing at random.
“Missing data were assumed as missing at random.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The control group, composed mainly of healthcare personnel, is representative of the general population for assessing vaccine immunogenicity.
“The control group included a sample of the general population, consisting mainly of healthcare personnel.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The methods used to ascertain COVID-19 (participant questioning and medical file review) detected all symptomatic infections during follow-up.
“The participants were questioned whether they contracted COVID-19 infection, confirmed by PCR, following each vaccine dose.In addition, up to the data cut-off, the patient files were reviewed for evidence of COVID-19 infection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mRNA vaccine clinical trials did not specifically capture herpes zoster occurrence.
“As the occurrence of HZ was not specifically captured in the mRNA vaccine clinical trials, no data are available on the postvaccination HZ prevalence in the general population.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regardless of the vaccine received, reductions in vaccine-elicited humoral immunity is likely to be clinically significant for persons with impaired immunity as a result of underlying disease, immunosuppressive drugs or older age.
“Moreover, regardless of the vaccine received, reductions in vaccine-elicited humoral immunity is likely to be clinically significant for persons with impaired immunity as a result of underlying disease, immunosuppressive drugs or older age [241][242][243][244] .”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [242]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
RA JAK-inhibitor percentage does not match its count
MinorFor the 263 patients with RA, 46 JAK-inhibitor users represent 17.49%, rather than the reported 16.9%.
Reported 16.9 · recomputed 17.490494
“| RA, n=263 | 55 (20.91) | 116 (44.11) | 47 (17.87) | 29 (11.03) | 43 (16.35) | 15 (5.7) | 46 (16.9) | 0 | 0 |”
Overall JAK-inhibitor percentage does not match its count
MinorThe treatment table gives 49 JAK-inhibitor users among 686 patients, which is 7.14%, not 6.9%.
Reported 6.9 · recomputed 7.142857
“| All AIIRD, n=686 | 130 (18.95) | 176 (25.66) | 172 (25.07) | 37 (5.39) | 87 (12.68) | 16 (2.33) | 49 (6.9) | 48 (7) | 28 (4.08) |”
Two different mean glucocorticoid doses are reported
MinorThe results give a mean prednisone dose of 6.7 mg/day, while the discussion gives 6.2 mg/day for the study population.
“Glucocorticoids (GC) were used in 18.95% (n=130), at a mean prednisone dose of 6.7±6.25 mg/day.”
“The mean GC dose in our study population was relatively low (6.2 mg/day)”
Other-vasculitis seropositivity percentage is overstated
MinorNineteen seropositive patients out of 23 is 82.61%, rather than 86.6%. The regression table separately reports 82.61% for the same group.
Reported 86.6 · recomputed 82.608696
“Other vasculitis, n=23 19 (86.6) 122.7±87.9”
Older-age subgroup counts cannot both be correct
MinorThe paper reports 225 patients aged at least 65, but the regression table lists 246 patients older than 65. The narrower, older-than-65 group cannot contain more patients.
“Patients with AIIRD included a subgroup of elderly patients aged ≥65 years (32.8%,n=225)”
“| Age >65 years, n=246 | 195 (79.27) | 0.33 (0.22 to 0.52) | 0.43 (0.25 to 0.75) | 0.002 |”
JAK-inhibitor counts across diagnoses do not reach the reported total
MinorThe treatment table lists 46 JAK-inhibitor users with RA and two with PsA, with zero in every other diagnostic group. Those entries total 48, not the reported 49.
Reported 49 · recomputed 48
“| All AIIRD, n=686 | 130 (18.95) | 176 (25.66) | 172 (25.07) | 37 (5.39) | 87 (12.68) | 16 (2.33) | 49 (6.9) | 48 (7) | 28 (4.08) |”
Anti-CD20 monotherapy response is assigned the overall treatment rate
MinorThe discussion states 41.3% seropositivity for anti-CD20 monotherapy, but the treatment table reports 11 of 28 monotherapy patients seropositive, or about 39%. The 41.3% figure corresponds instead to the overall anti-CD20 group.
“Treatment with anti-CD20 therapies, mainly represented by rituximab in this study, significantly reduced vaccineinduced humoral response, with seropositivity of 41.3% when administered as monotherapy and 36% when administered in combination with MTX.”
“| Anti-CD20 monotherapy, n=28 | 11 (39) | <0.0001 |”
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 654
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Geisen, 2021, Immunogenicity and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions and immunosuppressive therapy in a monocentric cohort, Ann Rheum Dis, 80, 1302, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220272 · DOI
- Boyarsky, 2021, Antibody response to a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, Ann Rheum Dis, 80, 1098, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220289 · DOI
- Connolly, 2021, Safety of the first dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, Ann Rheum Dis, 80, 1100, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220231 · DOI
- Aletaha, 2010, Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative, Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 2569, 10.1002/art.27584 · DOI
- Taylor, 2006, Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study, Arthritis Rheum, 54, 2665, 10.1002/art.21972 · DOI
- Rudwaleit, 2009, The development of assessment of spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (Part II): validation and final selection, Ann Rheum Dis, 68, 777, 10.1136/ard.2009.108233 · DOI
- Hochberg, 1997, Updating the American College of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis Rheum, 40, 1725, 10.1002/art.1780400928 · DOI · Paper page
- Jennette, 1994, Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides. proposal of an international consensus conference, Arthritis Rheum, 37, 187, 10.1002/art.1780370206 · DOI
- Lundberg, 2017, European League against Rheumatism/American College of rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups, Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 1955, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468 · DOI
- Criscuolo, 2021, Weak correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity in sera from SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects, J Med Virol, 93, 2160, 10.1002/jmv.26605 · DOI · Paper page
- Kapetanovic, 2006, Influence of methotrexate, TNF blockers and prednisolone on antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Rheumatology, 45, 106, 10.1093/rheumatology/kei193 · DOI
- Kapetanovic, 2011, Antibody response is reduced following vaccination with 7-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine in adult methotrexate-treated patients with established arthritis, but not those treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, Arthritis Rheum, 63, 3723, 10.1002/art.30580 · DOI
- Ribeiro, 2011, Reduced seroprotection after pandemic H1N1 influenza adjuvant-free vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: implications for clinical practice, Ann Rheum Dis, 70, 2144, 10.1136/ard.2011.152983 · DOI
- Park, 2017, Effect of methotrexate discontinuation on efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial, Ann Rheum Dis, 76, 1559, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211128 · DOI · Paper page
- Park, 2018, Impact of temporary methotrexate discontinuation for 2 weeks on immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial, Ann Rheum Dis, 77, 898, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213222 · DOI · Paper page
- Fomin, 2006, Vaccination against influenza in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease modifying drugs, including TNF alpha blockers, Ann Rheum Dis, 65, 191, 10.1136/ard.2005.036434 · DOI
- Elkayam, 2010, The effect of infliximab and timing of vaccination on the humoral response to influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, Semin Arthritis Rheum, 39, 442, 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.12.002 · DOI
- Kivitz, 2014, Vaccine responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with certolizumab pegol: results from a single-blind randomized phase IV trial, J Rheumatol, 41, 648, 10.3899/jrheum.130945 · DOI
- Rondaan, 2019, Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review for the 2019 update of EULAR recommendations, RMD Open, 5, e001035, 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001035 · DOI · Paper page
- Mori, 2012, Impact of tocilizumab therapy on antibody response to influenza vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis, 71, 2006, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201950 · DOI
- Tsuru, 2014, Immune response to influenza vaccine and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine under IL-6 signal inhibition therapy with tocilizumab, Mod Rheumatol, 24, 511, 10.3109/14397595.2013.843743 · DOI
- Richi, 2019, Secukinumab does not impair the immunogenic response to the influenza vaccine in patients, RMD Open, 5, e001018, 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001018 · DOI
- Furer, 2020, Immunogenicity and safety of vaccination against seasonal influenza vaccine in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with secukinumab, Vaccine, 38, 847, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.081 · DOI
- Winthrop, 2016, The effect of tofacitinib on pneumococcal and influenza vaccine responses in rheumatoid arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis, 75, 687, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207191 · DOI · Paper page
- Winthrop, 2019, Evaluation of pneumococcal and tetanus vaccine responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving baricitinib: results from a long-term extension trial substudy, Arthritis Res Ther, 21, 102, 10.1186/s13075-019-1883-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Westra, 2014, Rituximab impairs immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG (subclass) responses after influenza vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis patients, Clin Exp Immunol, 178, 40, 10.1111/cei.12390 · DOI · Paper page
- Bar-Or, 2020, Effect of ocrelizumab on vaccine responses in patients with multiple sclerosis: the VELOCE study, Neurology, 95, e1999, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010380 · DOI
- Spiera, 2021, Rituximab, but not other antirheumatic therapies, is associated with impaired serological response to SARS- CoV-2 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases, Ann Rheum Dis, 80, 1352, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220604 · DOI · Paper page
- Grifoni, 2020, Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals, Cell, 181, 1489, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
- Jeyanathan, 2020, Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies, Nat Rev Immunol, 20, 615, 10.1038/s41577-020-00434-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Grupper, 2021, Reduced humoral response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients without prior exposure to the virus, Am J Transplant
- Peled, 2021, BNT162b2 vaccination in heart transplant recipients: clinical experience and antibody response, J Heart Lung Transplant, 10.1016/j.healun.2021.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Rodríguez-Jiménez, 2021, Varicella-Zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases, JAAD Case Rep, 12, 58, 10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Bostan, 2021, Herpes zoster following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a coexistence or coincidence?, J Cosmet Dermatol, 20, 1566, 10.1111/jocd.14035 · DOI · Paper page
- Eid, 2021, Herpes zoster emergence following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, J Med Virol, 10.1002/jmv.27036 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Furer, V., Eviatar, T., Zisman, D., Peleg, H., Paran, D., Levartovsky, D., Zisapel, M., Elalouf, O., Kaufman, I., Meidan, R., Broyde, A., Polachek, A., Wollman, J., Litinsky, I., Meridor, K., Nochomovitz, H., Silberman, A., Rosenberg, D., Feld, J., Haddad, A., Gazzit, T., Elias, M., Higazi, N., Kharouf, F., Shefer, G., Sharon, O., Pel, S., Nevo, S., & Elkayam, O.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
- Carmel Medical Center (IL)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Furer, Victoria
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1330-1338
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3164069651
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 254 · 2021: 99
- FWCI
- 47.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2022-07-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Keywords
- BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination, autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases, vaccine immunogenicity, vaccine safety, rituximab, glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, abatacept, disease activity, adverse events, herpes zoster, uveitis, pericarditis
- MeSH terms
- Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, Autoimmune Diseases, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Rheumatic Diseases, Immunocompromised Host, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review