Cited by 25Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsInfant Development and Preterm Care

Evaluation of ‘TRY’: an algorithm for neonatal continuous positive airways pressure in low-income settings

Open access
Crehan, Caroline, Colbourn, Tim, Heys, Michelle, Molyneux, Elizabeth·2018·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive respiratory support using bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is useful in treating babies with respiratory distress syndrome. Despite its proven clinical and cost-effectiveness, implementation is hampered by the inappropriate administration of bCPAP in low-resource settings. A clinical algorithm—‘TRY’ (based on Tone: good; Respiratory distress; Yes, heart rate above 100 beats/min)—has been developed to correctly identify which newborns would benefit most from bCPAP in a teaching hospital in Malawi. Objective: To evaluate the reliability, sensitivity and specificity of TRY when employed by nurses in a Malawian district hospital. Methods: Nursing staff in a Malawian district hospital baby unit were asked, over a 2-month period, to complete TRY assessments for every newly admitted baby with the following inclusion criteria: clinical evidence of respiratory distress and/or birth weight less than 1.3 kg. A visiting paediatrician, blinded to nurses’ assessments, concurrently assessed each baby, providing both a TRY assessment and a clinical decision regarding the need for CPAP administration. Inter-rater reliability was calculated comparing nursing and paediatrician TRY assessment outcomes. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated comparing nurse TRY assessments against the paediatrician’s clinical decision. Results: Two hundred and eighty-seven infants were admitted during the study period; 145 (51%) of these met the inclusion criteria, and of these 57 (39%) received joint assessments. The inter-rater reliability was high (kappa 0.822). Sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: District hospital nurses, using the TRY-CPAP algorithm, reliably identified babies that might benefit from bCPAP and thus improved its effective implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313867

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 3rd Stone Design. Pumani CPAP 3rd stone design [Internet]. 2016 http://www. 3rdstonedesign. com/ work/ pumanibcpap on August 14, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://adc.bmj.com/ Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313867 on 7 March 2018. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crehan, C., Colbourn, T., Heys, M., & Molyneux, E.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Crehan, Caroline
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-03-07
Volume
103
Issue
8
Pages
732-738
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2794412501
Cited by
25
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rice University
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2010-18-007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
bubble continuous positive airway pressure, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, clinical decision algorithm, resource-limited settings, nursing assessment, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity and specificity, low birth weight infants, non-invasive respiratory support
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Equipment Design, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, District, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Malawi, Male, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Sensitivity and Specificity, Observer Variation, Patient Selection, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review