Cited by 30Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationInnovations in Medical EducationOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Benefits of a programme taking advantage of patient-instructors to teach and assess musculoskeletal skills in medical students

Open access
Bideau, M, Guerne, P-A, Bianchi, M-P, Huber, P·2006·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Aim To evaluate a rheumatoid arthritis patient-instructor-based formation-assessment programme for its ability to improve and assess musculoskeletal knowledge and skills in third-year medical students.Methods (1) The quality of our musculoskeletal teaching was assessed before patient-instructor intervention through an open-questions test (pre-test) and performance record forms (PRFs) filled in by the patient-instructors. (2) The improvement afforded by patient-instructors was evaluated through a second (identical) open-questions test (post-test). (3) The resulting skills in the students were further assessed by an individual patient-instructors physical status record form (PSRF), filled in by the students.Results Pre-tests and post-tests showed an improvement in correct answers from a mean score of 39% to 47%. The history-taking questions that obtained <50% scores in the pre-test mostly dealt with the consequences of a chronic illness. Intervention of patient-instructors especially improved knowledge of the psychosocial aspects and side effects of drugs. With regard to physical examination, patient-instructors makedly improved the identification of assessment of signs of active and chronic inflammation. PRF analysis showed that 10 of 28 questions answered by <50% of the students were related to disease characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis, extra-articular signs, side effects of drugs and psychosocial aspects. Analysis of the PSRF indicated that the weakness of our students' physical examination abilities in particular is related to recognising the types of swelling and differentiating tenderness from pain on motion.Conclusion This study proves the considerable benefits of the involvement of patient-instructors in the teaching and assessment of clinical skills in students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.2004.031153

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Branch VK, Graves G, Hanczyc M, Lipsky PE. The utility of trained arthritis patient educators in the evaluation and improvement of musculoskeletal examination skills of physicians in training. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:61-9.
  2. Gruppen LD, Branch VK, Laing TJ. The use of trained patient educators with rheumatoid arthritis to teach medical students. Arthritis Care Res 1996;9:302-8.
  3. Branch VK, Lipsky K, Nieman T, Lipsky PE. Positive impact of an intervention by arthritis patient educators on knowledge and satisfaction of patients in a rheumatology practice. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:370-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bideau, M., Guerne, P.-A., Bianchi, M.-P., & Huber, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Guerne, P-A
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
65
Issue
12
Pages
1626-1630
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025929373
Cited by
30
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, medical students, clinical skills assessment, physical examination, medical history, psychosocial aspects of chronic illness, adverse drug reactions, extra-articular manifestations, rheumatology education
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Medical History Taking, Patients, Physical Examination, Rheumatology, Teaching, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review