Cited by 26Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Patient-Centred education: what do students think?

Oswald, Anna, Czupryn, Joanna, Wiseman, Jeffrey, Snell, Linda·2014·Medical Education

Abstract

CONTEXT: Medical educators endeavour to foster patient-centred learning. Although studies of patient-educators report general increases in patient-centredness, no formal review of students' reflections on the role of patients in their education has yet been undertaken. Our research questions were: (i) What themes might be identified through a qualitative analysis of students' reflective writing on patient-centred education? (ii) What are common students' perceptions regarding patients as educators? METHODS: For two academic years, Year 2 pre-clinical students (189 and 167 students, respectively, in each academic year) submitted a 250-word writing assignment in response to one of four questions meant to promote reflection on the role of patients in their education. Using a grounded theory approach, we performed a qualitative analysis of these written reflections for emerging themes. A synthesis of these themes was prepared and was presented for validation and discussion by two focus groups of six and three students, respectively. We analysed the transcripts of the focus group discussions and compared them with results from the analysis of written reflections and used them to further inform and refine our initial thematic framework. RESULTS: A total of 356 reflective writing assignments were analysed. The major themes were: (i) students seeing the condition within the context of patients' lives; (ii) patients supporting students' learning; (iii) students recognising patients' needs; (iv) students seeing the patient as a capable part of the team, and (v) students recognising the complexity of practising medicine. The two focus group discussions confirmed these main themes, but placed greater emphasis on the first and second themes. These themes mapped closely to the conceptualisation of patient-centred care defined by the International Alliance of Patients' Organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Students' reflections on their experiences of patient-educators cover an important and broad range of key concepts in patient-centred care that are well aligned with patient-generated conceptualisations of patient-centred care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12287

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oswald, A., Czupryn, J., Wiseman, J., & Snell, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Oswald, Anna
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-12
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
170-180
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2059589776
Cited by
26
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient-centred education, patient educators, medical students' perceptions, reflective writing, patient-centered care, preclinical education
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Role, Students, Medical, Teaching, Writing, Focus Groups, Patient-Centered Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review