Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voriconazole in the treatment of fungal eye infections: a review of current literature

Hariprasad, S M, Mieler, W F, Lin, T K, Sponsel, W E, Graybill, J R·2008·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is associated with heart disease. There has been no systematic study of cardiac structure and function in patients with this condition. In this study, the epidemiology of cardiac changes and their relationship to renal function, renovascular anatomy, and BP are delineated. With the use of a cross-sectional design, 79 patients with ARVD and 50 control patients without ARVD underwent echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. Clinical and biochemical data were collected. Results were analyzed according to renal function, residual renal artery patency, and unilateral or bilateral ARVD. Only 4 (5.1%) patients with ARVD had normal cardiac structure and function. Patients with ARVD (age 70.7 ± 7.5 yr; estimated GFR 36 ± 19 ml/min) had significantly more cardiovascular comorbidity (77.2 versus 42.0%; P < 0.001), greater prevalence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (78.5 versus 46.0%; P < 0.001) and LV diastolic dysfunction (74.6 versus 40.0%; P < 0.001), and greater LV mass index (183 ± 74 versus 116 ± 33 g/m2; P < 0.001) and LV end-diastolic volume index (82 ± 35 versus 34 ± 16 ml/m2; P < 0.001) than control subjects. BP was similar for both patient groups. For patients with ARVD, neither renal function nor renal artery patency predicted a difference in echocardiographic or ambulatory BP monitoring parameters. Patients with bilateral ARVD had greater LV mass index and LV dilation than patients with unilateral disease. Patients with ARVD exhibit a high prevalence of cardiac morphologic and functional abnormalities at early stages of renal dysfunction. Such patients must be identified early in their disease course to allow risk factor modification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.2007.136515

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Hariprasad, S. M., Mieler, W. F., Lin, T. K., Sponsel, W. E., & Graybill, J. R.
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-06-24
Volume
92
Issue
7
Pages
871-878
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160420092
Cited by
263
References
3
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voriconazole in the treatment of fungal eye infections: a review of current literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.2007.136515
The paper
Hariprasad, S. M., Mieler, W. F., Lin, T. K., Sponsel, W. E., & Graybill, J. R. (2008). Voriconazole in the treatment of fungal eye infections: a review of current literature. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.136515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.