The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications.
Open accessAbstract
Comparative study of intraoperative mitomycin C and irradiation in pterygium surgery EDITOR,-We read with interest the study that compared intraoperative mitomycin C with irradiation in primary pterygium surgery. 1 The authors rightly commented that long term complications of irradiation, such as scleral necrosis, may arise more than 10 years after the irradiation.2 Longer follow ups are necessary to reveal such complications.We performed primary pterygium excision with intraoperative irradiation in one eye of six patients between 1988 and 1990.A dose of 1000 rad of irradiation was applied to the scleral bed intraoperatively and 1 week later.The patients were recently reviewed in our clinic for recurrence and complications.We also performed ultrasound biomicroscopic examination (UBM) for both eyes in each patient, looking for corneal and scleral thinning.Corneal thickness was arbitrarily measured 0.5 mm anterior to the scleral spur at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions of each eye, while the scleral thickness was measured 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur at the same positions.Mean follow up was 138.0 months.Mean age at time of surgery was 37.5 years (range 32-45 years).All six eyes were right eyes with nasal pterygia in male patients.No recurrence was found, using the same definition.There was neither significant deterioration in visual acuity nor increase in intraocular pressure in any eye.There were no signs of inflammation.There were no significant diVerences in the scleral and corneal thickness between the treated nasal position of the operated eye (mean scleral 0.617 (SD 0.112) mm; mean corneal 0.656 (0.076) mm) and the control nasal position of the fellow eye (mean scleral 0.611 (0.030) mm; mean corneal 0.645 (0.044) mm).Furthermore, there were no significant diVerences in the mean scleral and corneal thickness between the operated eye (scleral 0.590 (0.077) mm; corneal 0.635 (0.067) mm) and the fellow eye (scleral 0.590 (0.059) mm; corneal 0.624 (0.054) mm).The mean scleral and corneal thicknesses were calculated by averaging the scleral or corneal thickness at the four measured positions in each eye.It appears that irradiation is safe, even in the long term.We believe these additional data could supplement the findings by Amano et al.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age
Lucas, R. J., Peirson, S. N., Berson, D. M., Brown, T. M., Cooper, H. M., Czeisler, C. A., Figueiro, M. G., Gamlin, P. D., Lockley, S. W., O’Hagan, J. B., et al. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.10.004 · Cited by 1,278
Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious?
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611427305 · Cited by 921
Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development?
Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A. T., & Bunge, S. A. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001 · Cited by 686
Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations
GRANHOLM, E., ASARNOW, R. F., SARKIN, A. J., & DYKES, K. L. (1996) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01071.x · Cited by 462
Samuels, E., & Szabadi, E. (2008) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/157015908785777193 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- DIAMOND, J. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121e-121
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016024334
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.85.1.121e
- The paper
- DIAMOND, J. P. (2001). The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.1.121e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.